It has been hypothesized that that the threespine stickback fish is more likely to mate with a member of the opposite sex that is similar in size, rather than with fish that are different in size (McKinnon et al. 2004). Mating preference was measured in nine different populations. Preference was measured as an index that was zero if there was no preference for mating by size, positive if there was a preference for fish of different size, and negative is there was a preference for fish of the same size. The indices for the nine populations were as follows: -32.0, -29.8, -40.6, -90.8, -29.2, -28.8, -78.4, -59.2, -74.3 Assuming normality, test the hypothesis that, on average, fish show no preference for mating by size.

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018
18th Edition
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:Carter
Chapter10: Statistics
Section10.6: Summarizing Categorical Data
Problem 10CYU
icon
Related questions
Question

Please help me with the following question and make sure your answer is correct 100%, thank you 

The indices for the nine populations were as follows:
-32.0, -29.8, -40.6, -90.8, -29.2, -28.8, -78.4, -59.2, -74.3
Test the hypothesis that, on average, fish show no preference for mating by
size.
t Table
cum. prob
one-tail
two-tails
Sum:
n:
Mean:
Y
-32.0
-29.8
-40.6
-90.8
-29.2
-28.8
-78.4
-59.2
-74.3
-463.1
9
-51.46
Y^2
1024.00
888.04
1648.36
8244.64
852.64
829.44
6146.56
3504.64
5520.49
28659
S =
Σ(Y²)-n(Y²)
n-1
Y-μο
t = df=
s/√n
=n-1
t.50
t.75
t.85
t.90
t 95
t.975
t.99
t.995
t.999
t.9995
0.10
0.05
0.025
0.01 0.005 0.001 0.0005
0.10 0.05
0.02
0.01 0.002 0.001
6
1.943
2.447
3.143
t,80
0.50 0.25 0.20 0.15
1.00 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20
0.000 0.718 0.906 1.134 1.440
7 0.000 0.711 0.896 1.119 1.415 1.895 2.365 2.998
8 0.000 0.706 0.889 1.108 1.397 1.860 2.306 2.896
9 0.000 0.703 0.883 1.100 1.383 1.833 2.262 2.821
10 0.000 0.700 0.879 1.093 1.372 1.812 2.228 2.764
3.707 5.208
3.499 4.785
3.355 4.501
3.250
4.297
3.169 4.144
5.959
5.408
5.041
4.781
4.587
Transcribed Image Text:The indices for the nine populations were as follows: -32.0, -29.8, -40.6, -90.8, -29.2, -28.8, -78.4, -59.2, -74.3 Test the hypothesis that, on average, fish show no preference for mating by size. t Table cum. prob one-tail two-tails Sum: n: Mean: Y -32.0 -29.8 -40.6 -90.8 -29.2 -28.8 -78.4 -59.2 -74.3 -463.1 9 -51.46 Y^2 1024.00 888.04 1648.36 8244.64 852.64 829.44 6146.56 3504.64 5520.49 28659 S = Σ(Y²)-n(Y²) n-1 Y-μο t = df= s/√n =n-1 t.50 t.75 t.85 t.90 t 95 t.975 t.99 t.995 t.999 t.9995 0.10 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.005 0.001 0.0005 0.10 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.002 0.001 6 1.943 2.447 3.143 t,80 0.50 0.25 0.20 0.15 1.00 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.000 0.718 0.906 1.134 1.440 7 0.000 0.711 0.896 1.119 1.415 1.895 2.365 2.998 8 0.000 0.706 0.889 1.108 1.397 1.860 2.306 2.896 9 0.000 0.703 0.883 1.100 1.383 1.833 2.262 2.821 10 0.000 0.700 0.879 1.093 1.372 1.812 2.228 2.764 3.707 5.208 3.499 4.785 3.355 4.501 3.250 4.297 3.169 4.144 5.959 5.408 5.041 4.781 4.587
It has been hypothesized that that the threespine stickback fish is
more likely to mate with a member of the opposite sex that is
similar in size, rather than with fish that are different in size
(McKinnon et al. 2004).
Mating preference was measured in nine different populations.
Preference was measured as an index that was zero if there was
no preference for mating by size, positive if there was a preference
for fish of different size, and negative is there was a preference for
fish of the same size.
The indices for the nine populations were as follows:
-32.0, -29.8, -40.6, -90.8, -29.2, -28.8, -78.4, -59.2, -74.3
Assuming normality, test the hypothesis that, on average, fish
show no preference for mating by size.
Transcribed Image Text:It has been hypothesized that that the threespine stickback fish is more likely to mate with a member of the opposite sex that is similar in size, rather than with fish that are different in size (McKinnon et al. 2004). Mating preference was measured in nine different populations. Preference was measured as an index that was zero if there was no preference for mating by size, positive if there was a preference for fish of different size, and negative is there was a preference for fish of the same size. The indices for the nine populations were as follows: -32.0, -29.8, -40.6, -90.8, -29.2, -28.8, -78.4, -59.2, -74.3 Assuming normality, test the hypothesis that, on average, fish show no preference for mating by size.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780079039897
Author:
Carter
Publisher:
McGraw Hill
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition…
Algebra
ISBN:
9780547587776
Author:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Publisher:
HOLT MCDOUGAL
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
College Algebra (MindTap Course List)
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305652231
Author:
R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781938168383
Author:
Jay Abramson
Publisher:
OpenStax