it agrees with the (i, j) entry of the right side. First we make things clear by specifying that A has n columns and B has n rows (these dimensions have to agree, or the product is not defined). This gives us [AB]=b.j. (remember that we decided to use abbreviated notation, so we leave off the summation limits) so the (i, j) entry of the left-hand side is: [(AB)¹] =[AB]₁₁ Σassbus. At this point we can introduce A and B transpose because the j, k entry of any matrix is the k, j entry of its transpose: Σajabki = [4¹] [B]L.k. Σ{"]ky Since the terms of A and B are being expressed as a summation, they commute (i.e. order doesn't matter), which allows us to say (using our definition of matrix product): Ș[A¹] [B²].x = Σ [B"], [4"]µs = [B³A"],3 + Voilà, we have the (i, j) entry of the right-hand side, and the proof is complete. Exercise 11.5.2. Give a formula for (ABC)T, and prove your formula using summation notation.

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question

Please do Exercise 11.7.2 and Exercise 11.5.2 and please show step by step and explain

Proposition 11.5.1. If A and B are matrices such that the matrix product
is defined, then
(AB)™ = BT AT.
PROOF. We'll prove this by expressing the (i,j) entry of the left-hand side
in summation notation, doing some algebraic hocus-pocus, and showing that
it agrees with the (i, j) entry of the right side. First we make things clear by
specifying that A has n columns and B has n rows (these dimensions have
to agree, or the product is not defined). This gives us
[AB), = Σ with j
(remember that we decided to use abbreviated notation, so we leave off the
summation limits) so the (i, j) entry of the left-hand side is:
[(AB)¹] =[AB] =Σajbi
-
At this point we can introduce A and B transpose because the j, k entry
of any matrix is the k, j entry of its transpose:
Σajbi-[A¹] [B¹] kk.
Since the terms of A and B are being expressed as a summation, they
commute (i.e. order doesn't matter), which allows us to say (using our
definition of matrix product):
Σ[A¹] kj [B¹k = Σ [B¹], [A¹]µ.5 = [B¹A¹].
Voilà, we have the (i.j) entry of the right-hand side, and the proof is
complete.
Exercise 11.5.2. Give a formula for (ABC)T, and prove your formula
using summation notation.
0
Transcribed Image Text:Proposition 11.5.1. If A and B are matrices such that the matrix product is defined, then (AB)™ = BT AT. PROOF. We'll prove this by expressing the (i,j) entry of the left-hand side in summation notation, doing some algebraic hocus-pocus, and showing that it agrees with the (i, j) entry of the right side. First we make things clear by specifying that A has n columns and B has n rows (these dimensions have to agree, or the product is not defined). This gives us [AB), = Σ with j (remember that we decided to use abbreviated notation, so we leave off the summation limits) so the (i, j) entry of the left-hand side is: [(AB)¹] =[AB] =Σajbi - At this point we can introduce A and B transpose because the j, k entry of any matrix is the k, j entry of its transpose: Σajbi-[A¹] [B¹] kk. Since the terms of A and B are being expressed as a summation, they commute (i.e. order doesn't matter), which allows us to say (using our definition of matrix product): Σ[A¹] kj [B¹k = Σ [B¹], [A¹]µ.5 = [B¹A¹]. Voilà, we have the (i.j) entry of the right-hand side, and the proof is complete. Exercise 11.5.2. Give a formula for (ABC)T, and prove your formula using summation notation. 0
In the above exercise, we have considered the trace of the sum of two
matrices. Now we consider the trace of the product of two matrices. To this
end, let A and B be a n x n matrices. So first we have:
- Σ(AB) = Σ(Σarabas) - Σ arbus
ik
All we've done here is take the matrix product formula, and set the
second index of the second matrix entry equal to first index of the first
matrix entry. Now to make things interesting, let's find the trace for the
reverse order:
Tr (BA) -- ΣΙΒΑ - Σ (Σκάκι)
Let's play with this last equation a bit. As we mentioned before, we
can change the sum over i, k to a sum over i, k without changing anything.
Furthermore, since bi, and ai are numbers, they commute under multipli-
cation:
itaki-akibik-
ik
Tr (BA) = bak, akib.x.
=
Finally, we rename the indices by changing k to i and i to k. (Remember,
it's the positions of the indices that are important, not the letters we call
them by!) After renaming, we get:
Tr (BA) = Σ @labwe
which agrees with our original expression for Tr(AB).
Exercise 11.7.2. In the above proof that Tr(AB) = Tr(BA), we assumed
that both A and B were square matrices. Show that the formula is still
true when A is a mx n matrix and B is a n x m matrix. (Notice that AB
and BA are both square matrices, so that Tr (AB) and Tr (BA) are both
well-defined.)
0
Transcribed Image Text:In the above exercise, we have considered the trace of the sum of two matrices. Now we consider the trace of the product of two matrices. To this end, let A and B be a n x n matrices. So first we have: - Σ(AB) = Σ(Σarabas) - Σ arbus ik All we've done here is take the matrix product formula, and set the second index of the second matrix entry equal to first index of the first matrix entry. Now to make things interesting, let's find the trace for the reverse order: Tr (BA) -- ΣΙΒΑ - Σ (Σκάκι) Let's play with this last equation a bit. As we mentioned before, we can change the sum over i, k to a sum over i, k without changing anything. Furthermore, since bi, and ai are numbers, they commute under multipli- cation: itaki-akibik- ik Tr (BA) = bak, akib.x. = Finally, we rename the indices by changing k to i and i to k. (Remember, it's the positions of the indices that are important, not the letters we call them by!) After renaming, we get: Tr (BA) = Σ @labwe which agrees with our original expression for Tr(AB). Exercise 11.7.2. In the above proof that Tr(AB) = Tr(BA), we assumed that both A and B were square matrices. Show that the formula is still true when A is a mx n matrix and B is a n x m matrix. (Notice that AB and BA are both square matrices, so that Tr (AB) and Tr (BA) are both well-defined.) 0
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,