Is the state n=3,l=3 ml= -2 ms=1/2 an allowable state? If not why not? 1- No: Magnetic quantum number must equal the principal quantum number 2- Yes: it is an allowable state 3- No. Magnetic quantum number cannot be negative 4- No: magnetic quantum number must equal the orbital quantum number 5- No: orbital quantum number cannot equal the principal quantum number. What is the answer?

icon
Related questions
Question
**Quantum State Allowability Check**

**Question:**
Is the state \(n = 3\), \(l = 3\), \(m_l = -2\), \(m_s = \frac{1}{2}\) an allowable state? If not, why not?

**Options:**
1. No: Magnetic quantum number must equal the principal quantum number.
2. Yes: It is an allowable state.
3. No: Magnetic quantum number cannot be negative.
4. No: Magnetic quantum number must equal the orbital quantum number.
5. No: Orbital quantum number cannot equal the principal quantum number.

**Answer:**
What is the answer?
Transcribed Image Text:**Quantum State Allowability Check** **Question:** Is the state \(n = 3\), \(l = 3\), \(m_l = -2\), \(m_s = \frac{1}{2}\) an allowable state? If not, why not? **Options:** 1. No: Magnetic quantum number must equal the principal quantum number. 2. Yes: It is an allowable state. 3. No: Magnetic quantum number cannot be negative. 4. No: Magnetic quantum number must equal the orbital quantum number. 5. No: Orbital quantum number cannot equal the principal quantum number. **Answer:** What is the answer?
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer