#9 Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires causedby humans in the west? 356 of the 579 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused byhumans while 322 of the 597 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. Whatcan be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance?a. For this study, we should use Select an answerb. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:Hn: Select an answer vSelect an answer vSelect an answer v (please enter a decimal)Hj: Select an answer v| Select an answerSelect an answer(Please enter a decimal)c. The test statistic ? v=(please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)d. The p-value =(Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)e. The p-value is ? v af. Based on this, we should Select an answer v the null hypothesis.g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to concludethat the proportion of the 579 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is higher thanthe proportion of the 597 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west.O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is statistically significantevidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in thesouth is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence toconclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higherthan the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to concludethat the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is higher than thepopulation proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.

Note: Hi, thank you for the question. As per our company guideline we are supposed to answer only…

Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south higher than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 356 of the 579 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 322 of the 597 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answer Select an answer Select an answer | (please enter a decimal) H1: Select an answer Select an answer v Select an answer (Please enter a decimal) c. The test statistic ? v (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)