Is memory ability before a meal better than after a meal? Ten people were given memory tests before their meal and then again after their meal. The data is shown below. A higher score indicates a better memory ability. Score on the Memory Test Before a Meal 63 92 54 67 76 54 86 69 85 71 After a Meal 54 80 44 66 72 51 89 64 83 65 Assume a Normal distribution. What can be concluded at the the αα = 0.10 level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer t-test for the difference between two independent population means t-test for a population mean t-test for the difference between two dependent population means z-test for a population proportion z-test for the difference between two population proportions The null and alternative hypotheses would be: H0:H0: Select an answer μ1 p1 μd Select an answer ≠ < > = Select an answer 0 p2 μ2 (please enter a decimal) H1:H1: Select an answer p1 μ1 μd Select an answer = ≠ < > Select an answer p2 0 μ2 (Please enter a decimal) The test statistic ? t z = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) The p-value is ? ≤ > αα Based on this, we should Select an answer accept fail to reject reject the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is equal to the population mean memory score after a meal. The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.10, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal. The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken before a meal are higher on average than the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken after a meal. The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal then there would be a 0.38% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal would be at least 4.9 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal. If the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is the same as the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal then there would be a 0.38% chance of concluding that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 4.9 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal. There is a 0.38% chance of a Type I error. There is a 0.38% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 4.9 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. There is a 10% chance that the population mean memory score is the same before and after a meal. There is a 10% chance that your memory is so bad that you have already forgotten what this chapter is about. If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 10% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 10% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the sample mean memory scores before and after a meal for these 10 people who were part of the study differ from each other.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

Is memory ability before a meal better than after a meal?  Ten people were given memory tests before their meal and then again after their meal. The data is shown below. A higher score indicates a better memory ability.

Score on the Memory Test
Before a Meal 63 92 54 67 76 54 86 69 85 71
After a Meal 54 80 44 66 72 51 89 64 83 65

Assume a Normal distribution.  What can be concluded at the the αα = 0.10 level of significance?

For this study, we should use Select an answer t-test for the difference between two independent population means t-test for a population mean t-test for the difference between two dependent population means z-test for a population proportion z-test for the difference between two population proportions 

  1. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:   
  2.   

 H0:H0:  Select an answer μ1 p1 μd  Select an answer ≠ < > =  Select an answer 0 p2 μ2  (please enter a decimal)   

 H1:H1:  Select an answer p1 μ1 μd  Select an answer = ≠ < >  Select an answer p2 0 μ2  (Please enter a decimal)

  1. The test statistic ? t z  =  (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
  2. The p-value =  (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
  3. The p-value is ? ≤ >  αα
  4. Based on this, we should Select an answer accept fail to reject reject  the null hypothesis.
  5. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
    • The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is equal to the population mean memory score after a meal.
    • The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.10, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal.
    • The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken before a meal are higher on average than the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken after a meal.
    • The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal
  6. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
    • If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal then there would be a 0.38% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal would be at least 4.9 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal.
    • If the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is the same as the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal then there would be a 0.38% chance of concluding that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 4.9 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal.
    • There is a 0.38% chance of a Type I error.
    • There is a 0.38% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 4.9 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal.
  7. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.
    • There is a 10% chance that the population mean memory score is the same before and after a meal.
    • There is a 10% chance that your memory is so bad that you have already forgotten what this chapter is about.
    • If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 10% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal
    • If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 10% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the sample mean memory scores before and after a meal for these 10 people who were part of the study differ from each other.

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Anova and Design of Experiments
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman