Is memory ability before a meal better than after a meal? Ten people were given memory tests before their meal and then again after their meal. The data is shown below. A higher score indicates a better memory ability. Score on the Memory Test Before a Meal 66 68 58 70 62 58 81 77 74 66 After a Meal 64 68 52 61 57 71 73 75 66 60 Assume a Normal distribution. What can be concluded at the the αα = 0.01 level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer t-test for a population mean t-test for the difference between two dependent population means z-test for the difference between two population proportions t-test for the difference between two independent population means z-test for a population proportion The null and alternative hypotheses would be: H0:H0: Select an answer p1 μ1 μd Select an answer < ≠ = > Select an answer p2 0 μ2 (please enter a decimal) H1:H1: Select an answer μd p1 μ1 Select an answer > < = ≠ Select an answer p2 μ2 0 (Please enter a decimal) The test statistic ? z t = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) The p-value is ? > ≤ αα Based on this, we should Select an answer accept fail to reject reject the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is equal to the population mean memory score after a meal. The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken before a meal are higher on average than the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken after a meal. The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. If the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is the same as the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal then there would be a 7% chance of concluding that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 3.3 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal. There is a 7% chance of a Type I error. If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal then there would be a 7% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal would be at least 3.3 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal. There is a 7% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 3.3 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. There is a 1% chance that the population mean memory score is the same before and after a meal. There is a 1% chance that your memory is so bad that you have already forgotten what this chapter is about. If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the sample mean memory scores before and after a meal for these 10 people who were part of the study differ from each other. If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal
Is memory ability before a meal better than after a meal? Ten people were given memory tests before their meal and then again after their meal. The data is shown below. A higher score indicates a better memory ability.
Score on the Memory Test
Before a Meal | 66 | 68 | 58 | 70 | 62 | 58 | 81 | 77 | 74 | 66 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
After a Meal | 64 | 68 | 52 | 61 | 57 | 71 | 73 | 75 | 66 | 60 |
Assume a
For this study, we should use Select an answer t-test for a population mean t-test for the difference between two dependent population means z-test for the difference between two population proportions t-test for the difference between two independent population means z-test for a population proportion
- The null and alternative hypotheses would be:
H0:H0: Select an answer p1 μ1 μd Select an answer < ≠ = > Select an answer p2 0 μ2 (please enter a decimal)
H1:H1: Select an answer μd p1 μ1 Select an answer > < = ≠ Select an answer p2 μ2 0 (Please enter a decimal)
- The test statistic ? z t = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
- The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
- The p-value is ? > ≤ αα
- Based on this, we should Select an answer accept fail to reject reject the null hypothesis.
- Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
- The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal
- The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is equal to the population mean memory score after a meal.
- The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken before a meal are higher on average than the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken after a meal.
- The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal.
- Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
- If the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is the same as the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal then there would be a 7% chance of concluding that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 3.3 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal.
- There is a 7% chance of a Type I error.
- If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal then there would be a 7% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal would be at least 3.3 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal.
- There is a 7% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 3.3 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal.
- Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.
- There is a 1% chance that the population mean memory score is the same before and after a meal.
- There is a 1% chance that your memory is so bad that you have already forgotten what this chapter is about.
- If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the sample mean memory scores before and after a meal for these 10 people who were part of the study differ from each other.
- If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps