Is memory ability before a meal better than after a meal?  Ten people were given memory tests before their meal and then again after their meal. The data is shown below. A higher score indicates a better memory ability. Score on the Memory Test Before a Meal 66 68 58 70 62 58 81 77 74 66 After a Meal 64 68 52 61 57 71 73 75 66 60 Assume a Normal distribution.  What can be concluded at the the αα = 0.01 level of significance? For this study, we should use Select an answer t-test for a population mean t-test for the difference between two dependent population means z-test for the difference between two population proportions t-test for the difference between two independent population means z-test for a population proportion  The null and alternative hypotheses would be:        H0:H0:  Select an answer p1 μ1 μd  Select an answer < ≠ = >  Select an answer p2 0 μ2  (please enter a decimal)     H1:H1:  Select an answer μd p1 μ1  Select an answer > < = ≠  Select an answer p2 μ2 0  (Please enter a decimal) The test statistic ? z t  =  (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) The p-value =  (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) The p-value is ? > ≤  αα Based on this, we should Select an answer accept fail to reject reject  the null hypothesis. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is equal to the population mean memory score after a meal. The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken before a meal are higher on average than the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken after a meal. The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. If the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is the same as the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal then there would be a 7% chance of concluding that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 3.3 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal. There is a 7% chance of a Type I error. If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal then there would be a 7% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal would be at least 3.3 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal. There is a 7% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 3.3 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. There is a 1% chance that the population mean memory score is the same before and after a meal. There is a 1% chance that your memory is so bad that you have already forgotten what this chapter is about. If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the sample mean memory scores before and after a meal for these 10 people who were part of the study differ from each other. If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question

Is memory ability before a meal better than after a meal?  Ten people were given memory tests before their meal and then again after their meal. The data is shown below. A higher score indicates a better memory ability.

Score on the Memory Test

Before a Meal 66 68 58 70 62 58 81 77 74 66
After a Meal 64 68 52 61 57 71 73 75 66 60

Assume a Normal distribution.  What can be concluded at the the αα = 0.01 level of significance?

For this study, we should use Select an answer t-test for a population mean t-test for the difference between two dependent population means z-test for the difference between two population proportions t-test for the difference between two independent population means z-test for a population proportion 

  1. The null and alternative hypotheses would be:   
  2.   

 H0:H0:  Select an answer p1 μ1 μd  Select an answer < ≠ = >  Select an answer p2 0 μ2  (please enter a decimal)   

 H1:H1:  Select an answer μd p1 μ1  Select an answer > < = ≠  Select an answer p2 μ2 0  (Please enter a decimal)

  1. The test statistic ? z t  =  (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.)
  2. The p-value =  (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.)
  3. The p-value is ? > ≤  αα
  4. Based on this, we should Select an answer accept fail to reject reject  the null hypothesis.
  5. Thus, the final conclusion is that ...
    • The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal
    • The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is equal to the population mean memory score after a meal.
    • The results are statistically significant at αα = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken before a meal are higher on average than the ten memory scores from the memory tests that were taken after a meal.
    • The results are statistically insignificant at αα = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal.
  6. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
    • If the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is the same as the sample mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal then there would be a 7% chance of concluding that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 3.3 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal.
    • There is a 7% chance of a Type I error.
    • If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal then there would be a 7% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal would be at least 3.3 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal.
    • There is a 7% chance that the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test before a meal is at least 3.3 points higher than the mean memory score for the 10 people who took the test after a meal.
  7. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.
    • There is a 1% chance that the population mean memory score is the same before and after a meal.
    • There is a 1% chance that your memory is so bad that you have already forgotten what this chapter is about.
    • If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the sample mean memory scores before and after a meal for these 10 people who were part of the study differ from each other.
    • If the population mean memory score before a meal is the same as the population mean memory score after a meal and if another 10 people are given a memory test before and after a meal, then there would be a 1% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean memory score before a meal is higher than the population mean memory score after a meal
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Means
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman