International Relations is often criticized for its state-centric approach, i.e., assuming that the state is the most significant actor on the international stage. Is that a safe assumption in a global era? In what instances are non-state actors (foundations, nongovernmental organizations, international organizations) just as important as, or even more important than, states? Given their influence, what could be done to manage, respond to, control, or limit their role esp. in developing countries
International Relations is often criticized for its state-centric approach, i.e., assuming that the state is the most significant actor on the international stage. Is that a safe assumption in a global era? In what instances are non-state actors (foundations, nongovernmental organizations, international organizations) just as important as, or even more important than, states? Given their influence, what could be done to manage, respond to, control, or limit their role esp. in developing countries
Related questions
Question
International Relations is often criticized for its state-centric approach, i.e., assuming that the state is the most significant actor on the international stage. Is that a safe assumption in a global era? In what instances are non-state actors (foundations, nongovernmental organizations, international organizations) just as important as, or even more important than, states? Given their influence, what could be done to manage, respond to, control, or limit their role esp. in developing countries
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
