International Relations is often criticized for its state-centric approach, i.e., assuming that the state is the most significant actor on the international stage. Is that a safe assumption in a global era? In what instances are non-state actors (foundations, nongovernmental organizations, international organizations) just as important as, or even more important than, states? Given their influence, what could be done to manage, respond to, control, or limit their role esp. in developing countries

icon
Related questions
Question

International Relations is often criticized for its state-centric approach, i.e., assuming that the state is the most significant actor on the international stage. Is that a safe assumption in a global era? In what instances are non-state actors (foundations, nongovernmental organizations, international organizations) just as important as, or even more important than, states? Given their influence, what could be done to manage, respond to, control, or limit their role esp. in developing countries

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer