Individual industries will use energy as efficiently as it is economical to do so, and there are several incentives to improve the efficiency of energy consumption. To illustrate, consider the selection of a new water pump. The pump is to operate 800 hours per year. Pump A costs $2,000, has an overall efficiency of 80.58%, and it delivers 11 hp. The other available altemative, pump B, costs $1,200, has an overall efficiency of 44.39%, and delivers 12.8 hp. Both pumps have a useful life of five years and will be sold at that time. (Remember 1 hp = 0.746 kW.) Pump A will use SL depreciation over five years with an estimated SV of zero. Pump B will use the MACRS depreciation method with a class life of three years. After five years, pump A has an actual market value of $410, and pump B has an actual market value of $180. Using the IRR method on the after-tax cash flows and a before-tax MARR of 20%, is the incremental investment in pump A economically justifiable? The effective income tax rate is 26%. The cost of electricity is $0.05/kWh, and the pumps are subject to a study period of five years.

Individual industries will use energy as efficiently as it is economical to do so, and there are several incentives to improve the efficiency of energy consumption. To illustrate, consider the selection of a new water pump. The pump is to operate 800 hours per year. Pump A costs $2,000, has an overall efficiency of 80.58%, and it delivers 11 hp. The other available altemative, pump B, costs $1,200, has an overall efficiency of 44.39%, and delivers 12.8 hp. Both pumps have a useful life of five years and will be sold at that time. (Remember 1 hp = 0.746 kW.) Pump A will use SL depreciation over five years with an estimated SV of zero. Pump B will use the MACRS depreciation method with a class life of three years. After five years, pump A has an actual market value of $410, and pump B has an actual market value of $180. Using the IRR method on the after-tax cash flows and a before-tax MARR of 20%, is the incremental investment in pump A economically justifiable? The effective income tax rate is 26%. The cost of electricity is $0.05/kWh, and the pumps are subject to a study period of five years.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

An electric utility company is considering a re-engineering of a major hydroelectric facility. The project would yield greater capacity and lower cost per kilowatt-hour of power. As a result of the project, the price of power would be reduced. This is expected to increase the quantity of power demanded. The following data are available Effect of Reduced Price of Power 0.08 10,000,000 0.07 14,000,000 Current price ($/kWh) Current consumption (kWh/year) New price ($/kWh) Expected consumption (kWh/year) What is the annual benefit to consumers of power from this project? The annual benefit is $
A manufacturer has been ordered to stop discharging acidic waste into the city sewer. Your analysis shows that the company should choose one of the following systems: System Installed Cost H J $25,000 Your Answer: $35,000 Annual O&M Cost $1,000 in the first year, but grows by 10% each year $500 in the first year, but grows each year by $100 Salvage Value $2,000 $5,000 If the life span of each project is 20 years and interest is assumed to be Y%, which system should be purchased? 4
A machine was bought three years ago for $200,000 with the expected life of 8 years and a salvage value of $20,000. It now can be sold for $100,000. The annual operating cost for this machine over the next five years will be $30,000. A new machine can be purchased for $250,000, a salvage value of $20,000, expected life-of 10 years, and an annual operating cost of $20,000. Should we replace the old machine? MARR= 10%
A 20 kW enclosed motor with a load factor of 70% and an efficiency of 87.5% will be replaced by a new 20 kW enclosed motor operating at the same load factor, but will now have a higher efficiency of 91%. How many kW of power savings will be obtained from this project?
You are weighing the economics of installing a triple-glazed energy efficient window system in your building. The following life cycle costs and savings are provided. The study period is 25 years, and the discount rate is 10%. Is this an economically viable approach based on the Savings-to-Investment Ratio (SIR)? Triple- Glazed Energy Efficient Windows: Window Quantity takeoff: 10000 sf Initial Cost: $100/sf Annual Operating Costs: $2.5/sf Annual Energy Saving: $10/sf
Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
EVALUATE THE REQUIRED VALUE BASED ON THE GIVEN STANDARD NOTATION BD20,500 (A/P, 9%, 7) 2. BD590 (F/A, 5%, 10)
You are considering an investment project with the financial information provided below. Suppose the company is most concerned about the impact of its price estimate on the project's rate of return. How would you address this concern? The break-even value of unit price is ?
11-8. The Ford Motor Company is considering three mutually exclusive electronic stability control systems for protection against rollover of its automobiles. The investment (study) period is four years, and MARR is 12% per year. Data for the fixture costs of the systems are as follows. Alternatives В Annual savings MV (after 4 years) Capital investment $12,000 $15,800 $8,000 $4,000 $5,200 $3,000 $3,500 $1,500 $3,000 IRR 19.2% 18% 23% Plot the AW of each alternative against MARR as the MARR varies across this range: 4%, 8%, 12%, 16%, and 20%. What can you generalize about the range of the MARR for which each alternative is preferred? (11.2)
If the profit function for selling smart phone screen magnifier is -4500p2 + 561500p – 11898000, what is the maximum profit that can be expected from selling smart phone screen magnifiers? Question 1 options: $ 0, no profit $ 5,617,681 $ 1,717,764 -$ 8,004,171
Problem 05.024 Alternative Comparison - Different Lives You and your partner have become very interested in cross-country motorcycle racing and wish to purchase entry-level equipment. You have identified two alternative sets of equipment and gear. Package K has a first cost of $250,000, an operating cost of $5,500 per quarter, and a salvage value of $30,000 after its 2-year life. Package L has a first cost of $170,000 with a lower operating cost of $3,500 per quarter and an estimated $25,000 salvage value after its 4-year life. Which package offers the lower present worth analysis at an interest rate of 8% per year, compounded quarterly? The present worth of package K is $[ and that of package L is $[ (Click to select) offers the lower present worth.
The plant manager at a company would like to perform an analysis for a new $250,000 machine. She estimates benefits of $20,000 in the first year, and benefits are increasing by 10% per year. 1) What is the payback period for the machine? 2)Suppose that the machine life is 15 years and machine has a salvage value of 20% of the initial cost at the end of its useful life. If the MARR of the company is 11 % per year, is this investment acceptable? Why?