In year 1 and year 2, there are two products produced in a given economy: computers and bread. Suppose that there are no intermediate goods. In year 1, 20 computers are produced and sold at $600 each, and in year 2, 25 computers are produced and sold at $1080 each. In year 1, 20,000 loaves of bread are sold for $1 each, and in year 2, 23,000 loaves of bread are sold for $1.40 each. a. Nominal GDP in year 1 is $ 32,000', and nominal GDP in year 2 is $ 59,200'. (Round your responses to the nearest integer as needed.) b. Calculate real GDP in each year and the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 by using year 1 as the base year. Next, do the same calculations by using the chain-weighting method. Using year 1 as the base year, real GDP in year 1 is $ 32,000', real GDP in year 2 is $ 38,000', and the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 is 18.750 %. (Round responses for real GDP to the nearest integer as needed, and round your response for the percentage increase to three decimal places as needed.) Using the chain-weighting method, real GDP (in year 1 dollars) in year 1 is $ 32,000', real GDP in year 2 (in year 1 dollars) is $ 38,097, and the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 is 19.052 %. (Round responses for real GDP to the nearest integer as needed, and round your response for the percentage increase to three decimal places as needed.) c. Calculate the implicit GDP price deflator and the percentage inflation rate from year 1 to year 2 by using year 1 as the base year. Next, do the same calculations by using the chain-weighting method. Using year 1 as the base year, the implicit GDP price deflator in year 1 is 100.00, and the implicit GDP price deflator in year 2 is 155.79. (Round your responses to two decimal places as needed.) Based on these results for the implicit GDP price deflator, the rate of inflation between years 1 and 2 is 55.79 %. (Round your response to two decimal places as needed.) Using the chain-weighting method, the implicit GDP price deflator (based on values in year 1 dollars) in year 1 is 100.00', and the implicit GDP price deflator (based on values in year 155.39. (Round your responses to two decimal places as needed.) dollars) in year 2 is Based on these results for the implicit GDP price deflator, the rate of inflation between years 1 and 2 is 55.39 %. (Round your response to two decimal places as needed.) d. Suppose that computers in year 2 are twice as productive as computers in year 1. How does this change your calculations in parts (a)-(c)? Explain any differences. A reasonable way to account for the fact that computers in year 2 are twice as productive as computers in year 1 in the calculations in parts (a)-(c) would be to define a "computer" as a "year 1 computer," which would entail not changing the year 1 quantity of computers, not changing the year 1 price of computers, doubling the year 2 quantity of computers, and halving the year 2 price of computers. If this method of accounting for the fact that computers in year 2 are twice as productive as computers in year 1 were applied, then compared to the results from part (a), nominal GDP in year 1 would be the same and nominal GDP in year 2 would be the same. If this method of accounting for the productivity increase were applied, then compared to part (b), the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 using year 1 as the base year would be higher and the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 using the chain-weighting method would be higher. Compared to part (b), the signed difference in the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 between two calculations (year 1 base year minus chain-weighting) would be higher. If this method of accounting for the productivity increase were applied, then compared to part (b), the rate of inflation between years 1 and 2 based on the implicit GDP price deflator using year 1 as the base yea would be V and the rate of inflation between years 1 and 2 based on the implicit GDP price deflator using the chain-weighting method would be V Compared to part (c), the signed difference in the rate of inflation from year 1 to year 2 between two calculations (year 1 base year minus chain-weighting) would be

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question

explain how to get these answers

In year 1 and year 2, there are two products produced in a given economy: computers and bread. Suppose that there are no intermediate goods. In year 1, 20 computers are produced and sold at $600 each,
and in year 2, 25 computers are produced and sold at $1080 each. In year 1, 20,000 loaves of bread are sold for $1 each, and in year 2, 23,000 loaves of bread are sold for $1.40 each.
a. Nominal GDP in year 1 is $ 32,000', and nominal GDP in year 2 is $ 59,200. (Round your responses to the nearest integer as needed.)
b. Calculate real GDP in each year and the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 by using year 1 as the base year. Next, do the same calculations by using the chain-weighting method.
Using year 1 as the base year, real GDP in year 1 is $ 32,000', real GDP in year 2 is $ 38,000', and the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 is 18.750°%. (Round responses for real GDP to
the nearest integer as needed, and round your response for the percentage increase to three decimal places as needed.)
Using the chain-weighting method, real GDP (in year 1 dollars) in year 1 is $ 32,000 , real GDP in year 2 (in year 1 dollars) is $ 38,097, and the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 is
19.052 %. (Round responses for real GDP to the nearest integer as needed, and round your response for the percentage increase to three decimal places as needed.)
c. Calculate the implicit GDP price deflator and the percentage inflation rate from year 1 to year 2 by using year 1 as the base year. Next, do the same calculations by using the chain-weighting method.
Using year 1 as the base year, the implicit GDP price deflator in year 1 is 100.00', and the implicit GDP price deflator in year 2 is 155.79. (Round your responses to two decimal places as needed.)
Based on these results for the implicit GDP price deflator, the rate of inflation between years 1 and 2 is 55.79 %. (Round your response to two decimal places as needed.)
Using the chain-weighting method, the implicit GDP price deflator (based on values in year 1 dollars) in year 1 is 100.00', and the implicit GDP price deflator (based on values in year 1 dollars) in year 2 is
155.39. (Round your responses to two decimal places as needed.)
Based on these results for the implicit GDP price deflator, the rate of inflation between years 1 and 2 is 55.39 %. (Round your response to two decimal places as needed.)
d. Suppose that computers in year 2 are twice as productive as computers in year 1. How does this change your calculations in parts (a)-(c)? Explain any differences.
A reasonable way to account for the fact that computers in year 2 are twice as productive as computers in year 1 in the calculations in parts (a)-(c) would be to define a "computer" as a "year 1 computer," which
would entail not changing the year 1 quantity of computers, not changing the year 1 price of computers,
doubling
the year 2 quantity of computers, and
halving
the year 2 price of computers.
If this method of accounting for the fact that computers in year 2 are twice as productive as computers in year 1 were applied, then compared to the results from part (a), nominal GDP in year 1 would be
the same and nominal GDP in year 2 would be the same.
If this method of accounting for the productivity increase were applied, then compared to part (b), the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 using year 1 as the base year would be
higher
and the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 using the chain-weighting method would be higher.
Compared to part (b), the signed difference in the percentage increase in real GDP from
year 1 to year 2 between two calculations (year 1 base year minus chain-weighting) would be higher.
If this method of accounting for the productivity increase were applied, then compared to part (b), the rate of inflation between years 1 and 2 based on the implicit GDP price deflator using year 1 as the base year
would be
V and the rate of inflation between years 1 and 2 based on the implicit GDP price deflator using the chain-weighting method would be
V Compared to part (c), the signed difference
in the rate of inflation from year 1 to year 2 between two calculations (year 1 base year minus chain-weighting) would be
Transcribed Image Text:In year 1 and year 2, there are two products produced in a given economy: computers and bread. Suppose that there are no intermediate goods. In year 1, 20 computers are produced and sold at $600 each, and in year 2, 25 computers are produced and sold at $1080 each. In year 1, 20,000 loaves of bread are sold for $1 each, and in year 2, 23,000 loaves of bread are sold for $1.40 each. a. Nominal GDP in year 1 is $ 32,000', and nominal GDP in year 2 is $ 59,200. (Round your responses to the nearest integer as needed.) b. Calculate real GDP in each year and the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 by using year 1 as the base year. Next, do the same calculations by using the chain-weighting method. Using year 1 as the base year, real GDP in year 1 is $ 32,000', real GDP in year 2 is $ 38,000', and the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 is 18.750°%. (Round responses for real GDP to the nearest integer as needed, and round your response for the percentage increase to three decimal places as needed.) Using the chain-weighting method, real GDP (in year 1 dollars) in year 1 is $ 32,000 , real GDP in year 2 (in year 1 dollars) is $ 38,097, and the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 is 19.052 %. (Round responses for real GDP to the nearest integer as needed, and round your response for the percentage increase to three decimal places as needed.) c. Calculate the implicit GDP price deflator and the percentage inflation rate from year 1 to year 2 by using year 1 as the base year. Next, do the same calculations by using the chain-weighting method. Using year 1 as the base year, the implicit GDP price deflator in year 1 is 100.00', and the implicit GDP price deflator in year 2 is 155.79. (Round your responses to two decimal places as needed.) Based on these results for the implicit GDP price deflator, the rate of inflation between years 1 and 2 is 55.79 %. (Round your response to two decimal places as needed.) Using the chain-weighting method, the implicit GDP price deflator (based on values in year 1 dollars) in year 1 is 100.00', and the implicit GDP price deflator (based on values in year 1 dollars) in year 2 is 155.39. (Round your responses to two decimal places as needed.) Based on these results for the implicit GDP price deflator, the rate of inflation between years 1 and 2 is 55.39 %. (Round your response to two decimal places as needed.) d. Suppose that computers in year 2 are twice as productive as computers in year 1. How does this change your calculations in parts (a)-(c)? Explain any differences. A reasonable way to account for the fact that computers in year 2 are twice as productive as computers in year 1 in the calculations in parts (a)-(c) would be to define a "computer" as a "year 1 computer," which would entail not changing the year 1 quantity of computers, not changing the year 1 price of computers, doubling the year 2 quantity of computers, and halving the year 2 price of computers. If this method of accounting for the fact that computers in year 2 are twice as productive as computers in year 1 were applied, then compared to the results from part (a), nominal GDP in year 1 would be the same and nominal GDP in year 2 would be the same. If this method of accounting for the productivity increase were applied, then compared to part (b), the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 using year 1 as the base year would be higher and the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 using the chain-weighting method would be higher. Compared to part (b), the signed difference in the percentage increase in real GDP from year 1 to year 2 between two calculations (year 1 base year minus chain-weighting) would be higher. If this method of accounting for the productivity increase were applied, then compared to part (b), the rate of inflation between years 1 and 2 based on the implicit GDP price deflator using year 1 as the base year would be V and the rate of inflation between years 1 and 2 based on the implicit GDP price deflator using the chain-weighting method would be V Compared to part (c), the signed difference in the rate of inflation from year 1 to year 2 between two calculations (year 1 base year minus chain-weighting) would be
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Inflation and Unemployment
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education