In the Supreme Court case involving Charles Schenck, which tested the constitutionality of the Esplonage Act, the Supreme Court decided that Multiple Choice the right to criticize government was a fundamental civil liberty that could not be infringed upon even in times of war. the Constitution's guarantee of free speech was applicable only to speech that could be conclusively proven to be true. freedom of speech could be curtailed if the words produced a "clear and present danger." freedom of speech could be curtailed if the speech tended to encourage pernicious actions although the government could issue injunctions to prevent the media from printing materials that threatened national security, it could not punish them after the materials had been published.
In the Supreme Court case involving Charles Schenck, which tested the constitutionality of the Esplonage Act, the Supreme Court decided that Multiple Choice the right to criticize government was a fundamental civil liberty that could not be infringed upon even in times of war. the Constitution's guarantee of free speech was applicable only to speech that could be conclusively proven to be true. freedom of speech could be curtailed if the words produced a "clear and present danger." freedom of speech could be curtailed if the speech tended to encourage pernicious actions although the government could issue injunctions to prevent the media from printing materials that threatened national security, it could not punish them after the materials had been published.
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:3.
In the Supreme Court case involving Charles Schenck, which tested the
constitutionality of the Esplonage Act, the Supreme Court decided that
Multiple Choice
the right to criticize government was a fundamental civil
liberty that could not be infringed upon even in times of war.
the Constitution's guarantee of free speech was applicable
only to speech that could be conclusively proven to be true.
freedom of speech could be curtailed if the words produced
a "clear and present danger."
freedom of speech could be curtailed if the speech tended
to encourage pernicious actions.
although the government could issue injunctions to prevent
the media from printing materials that threatened national
security, it could not punish them after the materials had
been published.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education