In the precedent case Merritt vs Merritt (1970) 1 WLR 121, the legal principle that the court held Select one: a. Presumptions that the court makes are absolute. Therefore there is no intention to be legally bound in this case. b. The presumption of no intent to be legally bound in husband and wife agreements does not apply if the maried couples are separated when the agreement is made. c. The presumptions that the court makes are not rebuttable even if there is strong contrary evidence. d. No intention to be a legally bound in husband wife agreements like this one
In the precedent case Merritt vs Merritt (1970) 1 WLR 121, the legal principle that the court held Select one: a. Presumptions that the court makes are absolute. Therefore there is no intention to be legally bound in this case. b. The presumption of no intent to be legally bound in husband and wife agreements does not apply if the maried couples are separated when the agreement is made. c. The presumptions that the court makes are not rebuttable even if there is strong contrary evidence. d. No intention to be a legally bound in husband wife agreements like this one
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:In the precedent case Merritt vs Merritt (1970) 1 WLR 121, the legal principle that the court held was the following
Select one:
a. Presumptions that the court makes are absolute. Therefore there is no intention to be legally bound in this case.
b. The presumption of no intent to be legally bound in husband and wife agreements does not apply if the maried
couples are separated when the agreement is made.
c. The presumptions that the court makes are not rebuttable even if there is strong contrary evidence.
d. No intention to be a legally bound in husband wife agreements like this one
Next page
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
