In Professor Krugman's economics course, the correlation between the students' total scores prior to the final Which of the choices is correct interpretation of the slope in the context of the problem? examination and their final-examination scores is r = 0.5. The pre-exam totals for all students in the course have mean 280 and standard deviation 40. The final-exam scores have mean 75 and standard deviation 8. Professor Krugman has O For each point of a student's pre-exam score means an drop of 47 points on the final exam, on average. lost Julie's final exam but knows that her total before the exam was 300. He decides to predict her final-exam score from O For each point of a student's pre-exam score means an drop of 0.1 point on the final exam, on average. her pre-exam total. O For each point of a student's pre-exam score means an additional 47 points on the final exam, on average. O For each point of a student's pre-exam score means an additional 0.1 point on the final exam, on average. (a) Which of the choices is the least-squares regression line of final-exam scores on pre-exam total scores in this course? (b) Use a regression line to predict Julie's final-exam score. Give your answer as a whole number. Oj = 47 – 0.1x Oj= 47 + 0.1x Oj = -47 + 0.1x Predicted final-score = Oj = -0.1 – 47x (c) Julie does not think this method accurately predicts how well she did on the final exam. Select the statement that correctly uses r² to argue that her actual score could have been much higher (or much lower) than the predicted value. O Since r² = 0.25 is positive, then the regression line does not predict final scores very well. Julie could have a much higher score. O Since r = 0.25 is close to 0, then the regression line does not predict final scores very well. Julie could have a much higher or lower score. O Since r = 0.25 is not exactly Q then the regression line does predict final scores very well. Julie could have a much higher or lower score. O Since ² = 0.5 is close to 0, then the regression line does not predict final scores very well. Julie could have a much higher or lower score.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

I need help please!!

In Professor Krugnman's economics course, the correlation between the students’ total scores prior to the final
Which of the choices is correct interpretation of the slope in the context of the problem?
examination and their final-examination scores is r = 0.5. The pre-exam totals for all students in the course have mean
280 and standard deviation 40. The final-exam scores have mean 75 and standard deviation 8. Professor Krugman has
For each point of a student's pre-exam score means an drop of 47 points on the final exam, on average.
lost Julie's final exam but knows that her total before the exam was 300. He decides to predict her final-exam score from
For each point of a student's pre-exam score means an drop of 0.1 point on the final exam, on average.
her pre-exam total.
For each point of a student's pre-exam score means an additional 47 points on the final exam, on average.
For each point of a student's pre-exam score means an additional 0.1 point on the final exam, on average.
(a) Which of the choices is the least-squares regression line of final-exam scores on pre-exam total scores in this course?
(b) Use a regression line to predict Julie's final-exam score. Give your answer as a whole number.
O ŷ = 47 – 0.1x
Oj 47 + 0.1x
Predicted final-score =
Oj = -47 + 0.1x
O ŷ = -0.1 – 47x
(c) Julie does not think this method accurately predicts how well she did on the final exam. Select the statement that
correctly uses r² to argue that her actual score could have been much higher (or much lower) than the predicted value.
O Since r = 0.25 is positive, then the regression line does not predict final scores very well. Julie could have a much
higher score.
O Since r = 0.25 is close to 0, then the regression line does not predict final scores very well. Julie could have a
much higher or lower score.
O Since r = 0.25 is not exactly Q then the regression line does predict final scores very well. Julie could have a much
higher or lower score.
O Since r = 0.5 is close to 0, then the regression line does not predict final scores
well. Julie could have a much
higher or lower score.
Transcribed Image Text:In Professor Krugnman's economics course, the correlation between the students’ total scores prior to the final Which of the choices is correct interpretation of the slope in the context of the problem? examination and their final-examination scores is r = 0.5. The pre-exam totals for all students in the course have mean 280 and standard deviation 40. The final-exam scores have mean 75 and standard deviation 8. Professor Krugman has For each point of a student's pre-exam score means an drop of 47 points on the final exam, on average. lost Julie's final exam but knows that her total before the exam was 300. He decides to predict her final-exam score from For each point of a student's pre-exam score means an drop of 0.1 point on the final exam, on average. her pre-exam total. For each point of a student's pre-exam score means an additional 47 points on the final exam, on average. For each point of a student's pre-exam score means an additional 0.1 point on the final exam, on average. (a) Which of the choices is the least-squares regression line of final-exam scores on pre-exam total scores in this course? (b) Use a regression line to predict Julie's final-exam score. Give your answer as a whole number. O ŷ = 47 – 0.1x Oj 47 + 0.1x Predicted final-score = Oj = -47 + 0.1x O ŷ = -0.1 – 47x (c) Julie does not think this method accurately predicts how well she did on the final exam. Select the statement that correctly uses r² to argue that her actual score could have been much higher (or much lower) than the predicted value. O Since r = 0.25 is positive, then the regression line does not predict final scores very well. Julie could have a much higher score. O Since r = 0.25 is close to 0, then the regression line does not predict final scores very well. Julie could have a much higher or lower score. O Since r = 0.25 is not exactly Q then the regression line does predict final scores very well. Julie could have a much higher or lower score. O Since r = 0.5 is close to 0, then the regression line does not predict final scores well. Julie could have a much higher or lower score.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Research Ethics
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman