In Moon Knight (Episode 2: Summon the Suit; from 25:30-31-30) 3 psychological questions that need to be answered: • Is Harrow's belief in divine retribution-- in Ammit's justice-- grounded on sound morality? You may refer to Socrates' Euthyphro Problem; what does it have to do with Harrow's actions? • Harrow's morality lies in his faith in Ammit's justice; that the goddess can prevent crimes, harms, and pains before people can even do them. A world without harm, without crimes, and without pain is essentially a world of pleasure and happiness. Can it be said therefore that Harrow employs a utilitarian morality and the greatest happiness principle? Why? If not, whose happiness is he prioritizing? • According to Khonshu, he only punishes those who have already done harm (i.e., that he only punishes people who have been proven guilty of doing wrong--- that is his duty; however according to Harrow, Khonshu's work comes too late because harm has already been inflicted, crime has already been committed, and evil has already been done. With Ammit, on the other hand, she "lights the path to good by eradicating the choice of evil" hence implying that autonomy and agency is out of the question. What does the Immanuel Kant's formulations of the Categorical Imperative have to say about that?

Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)

5th Edition

ISBN:9780134477961

Author:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White

Publisher:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White

Chapter1: The Science Of Psychology

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1TY

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

100%

In Moon Knight (Episode 2: Summon the Suit; from 25:30-31-30) 3 psychological questions that need to be answered: • Is Harrow's belief in divine retribution-- in Ammit's justice-- grounded on sound morality? You may refer to Socrates' Euthyphro Problem; what does it have to do with Harrow's actions? • Harrow's morality lies in his faith in Ammit's justice; that the goddess can prevent crimes, harms, and pains before people can even do them. A world without harm, without crimes, and without pain is essentially a world of pleasure and happiness. Can it be said therefore that Harrow employs a utilitarian morality and the greatest happiness principle? Why? If not, whose happiness is he prioritizing? • According to Khonshu, he only punishes those who have already done harm (i.e., that he only punishes people who have been proven guilty of doing wrong--- that is his duty; however according to Harrow, Khonshu's work comes too late because harm has already been inflicted, crime has already been committed, and evil has already been done. With Ammit, on the other hand, she "lights the path to good by eradicating the choice of evil" hence implying that autonomy and agency is out of the question. What does the Immanuel Kant's formulations of the Categorical Imperative have to say about that?

Expert Solution