In McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, the US Supreme Court found limits on aggregate individual contributions (i.e., aggregate limits on political giving by an individual) to be unconstitutional. However, the court left intact the limits an individual can make to an individual campaign. Why did the court do this?
In McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, the US Supreme Court found limits on aggregate individual contributions (i.e., aggregate limits on political giving by an individual) to be unconstitutional. However, the court left intact the limits an individual can make to an individual campaign. Why did the court do this?
Related questions
Question
In McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, the US Supreme Court found limits on aggregate individual contributions (i.e., aggregate limits on political giving by an individual) to be unconstitutional. However, the court left intact the limits an individual can make to an individual campaign. Why did the court do this?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps