In Massachusetts v. EPA, the Court said it did not use Chevron deference because the a. CAA gave too much discretion to the agency. b. CAA said the agency “shall” prescribe regulations. c. plaintiffs did not have standing to sue the EPA. d. CAA is ambiguous on whether the EPA may take climate into consideration.
In Massachusetts v. EPA, the Court said it did not use Chevron deference because the a. CAA gave too much discretion to the agency. b. CAA said the agency “shall” prescribe regulations. c. plaintiffs did not have standing to sue the EPA. d. CAA is ambiguous on whether the EPA may take climate into consideration.
Related questions
Question
In Massachusetts v. EPA, the Court said it did not use Chevron deference because the
a. CAA gave too much discretion to the agency.
b. CAA said the agency “shall” prescribe regulations.
c. plaintiffs did not have standing to sue the EPA.
d. CAA is ambiguous on whether the EPA may take climate into consideration.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
