In February, Brady, a general contractor, signed a written con-tract with the Fulghums to build a house for them in North Carolina. The contract price of the house was $206,850, and construction was to begin in March of that year. Neither during the contract negotiations nor during the commence-ment of construction was Brady licensed as a general contrac-tor as required by North Carolina law. In fact, Brady did not obtain his license until late October of that year, at which time he had completed more than two-thirds of the construction on the Fulghums’ house. The Fulghums submitted to Brady total payments of $204,000 on the house. Brady sues for $2,850 on the original contract and $29,000 for additions and changes requested by the Fulghums during construction. Is Fulghum liable to Brady? Explain
In February, Brady, a general contractor, signed a written con-tract with the Fulghums to build a house for them in North Carolina. The contract price of the house was $206,850, and construction was to begin in March of that year. Neither during the contract negotiations nor during the commence-ment of construction was Brady licensed as a general contrac-tor as required by North Carolina law. In fact, Brady did not obtain his license until late October of that year, at which time he had completed more than two-thirds of the construction on the Fulghums’ house. The Fulghums submitted to Brady total payments of $204,000 on the house. Brady sues for $2,850 on the original contract and $29,000 for additions and changes requested by the Fulghums during construction. Is Fulghum liable to Brady? Explain.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
