In a survey, 37% of the respondents stated that they talk to their pets on the telephone. A veterinarian believed this result to be too high, so he randomly selected 210 pet owners and discovered that 74 of them spoke to their pet on the telephone. Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? Use the α=0.1 level of significance. Because np01−p0=nothing ▼ not equals≠ less than< equals= greater than> 10, the sample size is ▼ greater than less than 5% of the population size, and the sample ▼ is given to be random, is given to not be random, can be reasonably assumed to be random, cannot be reasonably assumed to be random, the requirements for testing the hypothesis ▼ are are not satisfied. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? H0: pp sigmaσ muμ pp equals= equals= greater than> less than< not equals≠ 0.370.37 versus H1: pp pp muμ sigmaσ less than< less than< not equals≠ equals= greater than> 0.370.37 (Type integers or decimals. Do not round.) Find the test statistic, z0. z0=nothing (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Find the P-value. P-value=nothing (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? A. The veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is less than 37%. B. The veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is not 37%. C. The veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is less than 37%. D. The veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is 37%
In a survey, 37% of the respondents stated that they talk to their pets on the telephone. A veterinarian believed this result to be too high, so he randomly selected 210 pet owners and discovered that 74 of them spoke to their pet on the telephone. Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? Use the α=0.1 level of significance. Because np01−p0=nothing ▼ not equals≠ less than< equals= greater than> 10, the sample size is ▼ greater than less than 5% of the population size, and the sample ▼ is given to be random, is given to not be random, can be reasonably assumed to be random, cannot be reasonably assumed to be random, the requirements for testing the hypothesis ▼ are are not satisfied. (Round to one decimal place as needed.) What are the null and alternative hypotheses? H0: pp sigmaσ muμ pp equals= equals= greater than> less than< not equals≠ 0.370.37 versus H1: pp pp muμ sigmaσ less than< less than< not equals≠ equals= greater than> 0.370.37 (Type integers or decimals. Do not round.) Find the test statistic, z0. z0=nothing (Round to two decimal places as needed.) Find the P-value. P-value=nothing (Round to three decimal places as needed.) Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? A. The veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is less than 37%. B. The veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is not 37%. C. The veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is less than 37%. D. The veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is 37%
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
In a survey,
37%
of the respondents stated that they talk to their pets on the telephone. A veterinarian believed this result to be too high, so
he
randomly selected
210
pet owners and discovered that
74
of them spoke to their pet on the telephone. Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? Use the
α=0.1
level of significance.Because
sample size is
5% of the population size, and the sample
the requirements for testing the hypothesis
satisfied.
np01−p0=nothing
10,
the ▼
not equals≠
less than<
equals=
greater than>
▼
greater than
less than
▼
is given to be random,
is given to not be random,
can be reasonably assumed to be random,
cannot be reasonably assumed to be random,
▼
are
are not
(Round to one decimal place as needed.)
What are the null and alternative hypotheses?
H0:
pp
sigmaσ
muμ
pp
equals=
equals=
greater than>
less than<
not equals≠
H1:
pp
pp
muμ
sigmaσ
less than<
less than<
not equals≠
equals=
greater than>
(Type integers or decimals. Do not round.)
Find the test statistic,
z0.
z0=nothing
(Round to two decimal places as needed.)Find the P-value.
P-value=nothing
(Round to three decimal places as needed.)Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical?
The veterinarian
has
a right to be skeptical. There
is
sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is less than
37%.
The veterinarian
has
a right to be skeptical. There
is
sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone
is not
37%.
The veterinarian
does not have
a right to be skeptical. There
is not
sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is less than
37%.
The veterinarian
does not have
a right to be skeptical. There
is not
sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is
37%
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman