In an infinitely repeated Prisoner's Dilemma, a version of what is known as a "tit for tat" strategy of a player iis described as follows: There are two "statuses" that player i might be in during any period: "normal" and "revenge"; . In a normal status player i cooperates; In a revenge status player i defects; From a normal status, player i switches to the revenge status in the next period only if the other player defects in this period; . From a revenge status player i automatically switches back to the normal status in the next period regardless of the other player's action in this period.

In an infinitely repeated Prisoner's Dilemma, a version of what is known as a "tit for tat" strategy of a player iis described as follows: There are two "statuses" that player i might be in during any period: "normal" and "revenge"; . In a normal status player i cooperates; In a revenge status player i defects; From a normal status, player i switches to the revenge status in the next period only if the other player defects in this period; . From a revenge status player i automatically switches back to the normal status in the next period regardless of the other player's action in this period.

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.7P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

9. In an infinitely repeated Prisoner's Dilemma, a version of what is known as a "tit for tat" strategy of a player 2 is described as follows: ⚫ There are two "statuses" that player i might be in during any period: "normal" and "revenge"; • In a normal status player i cooperates; ⚫ In a revenge status player i defects; • From a normal status, player i switches to the revenge status in the next period only if the other player defects in this period; • From a revenge status player i automatically switches back to the normal status in the next period regardless of the other player's action in this period. Consider an infinitely repeated game so that with probability p that the game continues to the next period and with probability (1-p) it ends. Cooperate (C) Defect (D) Cooperate (C) 4,4 5,0 Defect (D) 0,5 1,1 What is the threshold p* such that when p≥ p* always cooperating by player 2 is a best response to player 1 playing tit for tat and starting in a normal status, but when p < p*…
Question 1 Consider the following game. Player 1 has 3 actions (Top, middle,Bottom) and player 2 has three actions (Left, Middle, Right). Each player chooses their action simultaneously. The game is played only once. The first element of the payoff vector is player 1’s payoff. Note that one of the payoffs to player 2 has been omitted (denoted by x). A) Suppose that the value of x is such that player 2 has a strictly dominant strategy. Find the solution to the game. What solution concept did you use to solve the game? B) Suppose that the value of x is such the player 2 does NOT have a strictly dominant strategy. Find the solution to the game. What solution concept did you use to solve the game?
You could choose any position A (the first mover) or B (the second mover) in the following three bargaining games. For each game (I, II, or III), explain which player (A or B) you would pick in order to maximize your expected payoff? 1. Game I (one stage): A will make the first move and offer her partner a portion of 6 dollars. If the offer is accepted, the bargain is complete and each player gets an amount determined by the offer. If the offer is declined, each player gets nothing. 2. Game II (two stages): A will make the first move and offer her partner a portion of 12 dollars. If the offer is accepted, the bargain is complete and each player gets an amount determined by the offer. If the offer is declined, the 12 shrinks to 5 and B then gets a turn to make an offer. Again, the bargain is complete if A accepts and the division is made according to the terms of the offer. If player A declines the offer, each player gets nothing. 3. Game III (three stages): A will make the first move…
You suspect that you are a price leader in the market. Moreover, you are considering expanding your operations. H.R. Shovenstuff will observe your moves and then follow, but he is more secretive so you will not know whether to price high or low after his pricing decision has been made. Using the following game tree, solve for the Nash equilibrium. High Price Shovenstuff High Price Low Price You High Price (2,1) (6,2) Invest Low Price Invest, High Price, High Price O Invest, Low Price, High Price Invest, Low Price, Low Price O Don't Invest, High Price, High Price Don't Invest, Low Price, High Price LOW Price (2,4) You High Price (4,4) Don't Invest High Price Low Price Shovenstuff Low Price You High Price (8,1) (2.6) Low Price (2,1)
In 'the dictator' game, one player (the dictator) chooses how to divide a pot of $10 between herself and another player (the recipient). The recipient does not have an opportunity to reject the proposed distribution. As such, if the dictator only cares about how much money she makes, she should keep all $10 for herself and give the recipient nothing. However, when economists conduct experiments with the dictator game, they find that dictators often offer strictly positive amounts to the recipients. Are dictators behaving irrationally in these experiments? Whether you think they are or not, your response should try to provide an explanation for the behavior.
Which of the following best defines a Nash Equilibrium? A) A situation where each player maximizes their own payoff without regard to the strategies of others. B) A situation where no player can improve their payoff by unilaterally changing their strategy. C) A situation where players cooperate to achieve the highest collective payoff. D) A situation where each players strategy maximizes the opponents payoff.
This question is about the game theory in economics. Please can anyone answer the following question step by step elaborately?
4.2. Game theory (Prisoner's dilemma). Often, many sectors in an economy have two main rivals, battling it out in the marketplace. There can be rivalry such as between Apple and Samsung in Phones and Laptops. Suppose Apple plans to cut its price. Samsung will likely follow suit to retain its market share. This may end up with low profits for both companies. A price drop by either company may thus be construed as defecting since it breaks an implicit agreement to keep prices high and maximize profits. Thus, if Apple drops its price but Samsung continues to keep prices high, Apple is defecting, while Samsung is cooperating (by sticking to the spirit of the implicit agreement). In this scenario, Apple may win market share and earn incremental profits by selling more. Assume that the incremental profits that accrue to Apple and Samsung are as follows: If both keep prices high (Cooperate), profits for each company increase by AED200 million (because of normal growth in demand). If one drops…
i. ii. QUESTION ONE A. A Nash equilibrium is a strategy profile such that every player's strategy is the best response to all the other players. It requires that each player makes a best response and that expectations regarding the play of other players are correct. Below is the table showing strategies and payoff for Player 1 and Player 2. PLAYER 1 R1 R2 R3 R4 C1 0,7 5,2 7,0 6,6 C2 2,5 3,3 2,5 2,2 PLAYER 2 C3 7,0 5,2 0,7 4,4 CA 6,6 2,2 4,4 10,4 REQUIRED; Transform the normal form game above into an imperfect extensive game form Find the Nash equilibrium for the game above using iterative deletion of strictly dominated strategies. Find the Nash equilibrium using brute force or cell by cell inspection.
Type out the correct answer ASAP with proper explanation of it In the Ultimatum Game, player 1 is given some money (e.g. $10; this is public knowledge), and may give some or all of this to player 2. In turn, player 2 may accept player 1’s offer, in which case the game is over; or player 2 may reject player 1’s offer, in which case neither player gets any money, and the game is over. a. If you are player 2 and strictly rational, explain why you would accept any positive offer from player 1. b. In reality, many players reject offers from player 1 that are significantly below 50%. Why
10. Player A and Player B are playing a game . First , Player A chooses to either " Keep " or " Pass " . Second , Player B observes A's choice and Player B then chooses to either Keep or Pass . This process continues which creates the sequential game below . Please mark decisions that rational and selfish players will choose at every decision node ( 3 decisions by player A and 3 decisions by player B ) - mark them on the Figure . What is the equilibrium of this game ?
In the sequential production game shown below, the actions of four players are required in order for a company's project to be successful (for example, each player could be a different division or department with the company). Player 1 Player 2 Player 3 Player 4 Act Act Act Act 10 10 10 Quit Quit Quit Quit 10 -X -X -X -X -X -X Suppose x = 5,000 (payoffs are -5,000). Suppose player 1 believes that Player 4 will quit with probability p. How does this change the game? %3D O a) If 0 0.002, Player 1 will quit. O c) If p > 0, Player 1 will quit d) The value of p is irrelevant to Player 1 O o o o