In a world comprising two economies, each has to choose whether to use renewable energy in its production processes or use traditional fuels, such as oil and coal. The traditional fuels are cheaper and so keep down production costs for individual firms. However, their use is associated with the increasing incidence of extreme weather events causing devastating and costly natural disasters across the world. The choices the two economies face may be set out as an economic game with the payoff matrix shown in Figure 13.

In a world comprising two economies, each has to choose whether to use renewable energy in its production processes or use traditional fuels, such as oil and coal. The traditional fuels are cheaper and so keep down production costs for individual firms. However, their use is associated with the increasing incidence of extreme weather events causing devastating and costly natural disasters across the world. The choices the two economies face may be set out as an economic game with the payoff matrix shown in Figure 13.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

John and Daniel greatly enjoy each other's company but have different tastes regarding the best form of entertainment. John prefers the lowbrow entertainment of professional wrestling that disgusts Daniel. Meanwhile, Daniel likes highbrow opera, which bores John. However, each finds it preferable to spend the evening together rather than disagree about what to do and end up staying home angry. This interaction is modeled in the normal-form game below: Evening Entertainment John Wrestling Opera 1st attempt Daniel Wrestling 36.00, 12.00 0,0 Opera 0,0 6.00, 18.00 Identify any pure strategy equilibria of this game. Choose one or more: OA. (wrestling, wrestling) B. (wrestling, opera) OC. (opera, wrestling) OD. (opera, opera) O E. There are no pure strategy equilibria. See Hint
Answer to the image?
Problem 5 Two countries are currently facing the COVID threat when trading with each other. Such countries are currently considering three options: keeping the activities open, limiting the opening hours, or closing down. The following table shows the expected payoffs in billions of dollars. For example, if Country 1 will adopt “Limited opening" and Country 2 will keep the activities open, Country 1 will have a payoff of 4 billion dollars, while Country 2 will have a payoff of 8 billion dollars. Country 2 Оpen Limited opening Closed Оpen 5;5 8;4 10;0 Country 1 Limited opening 4;8 7;7 5;0 Closed 0;10 0;5 0;0 Question 5.1. In case of a simultaneous decision (simultaneous game), identify eventual equilibria, and strategies in this game for the two countries. Give a brief economic explanation of your results. Question 5.2. In case one of the two countries would choose first (sequential game), identify the two outcomes of the game, and eventual first/second mover advantages.
Two countries decide to specialize in producing certain goods to export to other countries, and in return they import different goods from these other countries. The advantage of these exports and imports is: Group of answer choices the country will be able to produce at a point outside your production possibilities frontier. the country will be able to consume at a point outside your production possibilities frontier. the countries will be able to produce and consume at a point outside your production possibilities frontier. the country's production possibilities frontier will shift outward.
two timber companies, Alpha and Beta, have to decide whether to harvest timber from the North Hill or the South Hill and then sell the timbers in the same market. If both harvest from North Hill, each company can harvest 100 tons of timber. If both companies harvest from South Hill, each company can harvest 150 tons of timber. If one company harvests from North Hill and the other harvests from South Hill, the company at North Hill can harvest 150 tons of timber while the company at South Hill can harvest 250 tons of timber. The price of timber is dependent on the total supply of timber in the market. The price will be $180 per ton if the total supply is 200 tons, $150 per ton if the total supply is 300 tons and $100 per ton if the total supply is 400 tons. To both companies, the cost of harvesting in North Hill is $5,000 and the cost of harvesting in South Hill is $10,000. (a) If Alpha and Beta were to make a decision simultaneously, construct the payoff matrix in terms of profit for…
A secluded off-ramp on a highway through the Prairie of Prax has two gas stations, the only gas stations for miles, Northgoings and Southgoings. Suppose Northgoings and Southgoings must simultaneously display their prices, choosing between a high price and low price gas. The payoff matrix for this game, showing potential daily profit, is displayed below. Assume both stations know all of the information in the matrix, and that this is a one-time payoff. Northgoings Decisions High Price Low Price N: $500 N: $800 High Price S: $400 S: $50 Southgoings Decisions N: $100 N: $250 Low Price S: $700 S: $200 (a) According to our model of game theory, Northgoings has a dominant strategy to [Select] (b) According to our model of game theory, Southlgoings has a dominant strategy to [ Select] V (c) According to our model of game theory, the competitive outcome, or Nash Equilibrium, Northgoings will earn [ Select] and Southgoings will earn [ Select] (d) On the other hand, if these two companies…
Please help with #2
Consider a simple example of a payoff matrix in the context of a trade dispute between two countries, Country A and Country B. In this scenario, both countries can either choose to impose tariffs (T) or not impose tariffs (N) on each other's exports. The payoffs that each country experiences are based on the chosen strategies and are presented below. (a) Does Country A and B have a dominant strategy? If so, specify its dominant strategy and explain your answer clearly.(b) What is the Nash equilibrium. Explain your answer clearly.(c) Suppose now the trade dispute is played sequentially, with Country B moving first. Represent the trade dispute in and extensive form.(d) Is this trade dispute a prisoner's dilemma game? Explain your answer.
Consider the following static, single-shot game played between two cyclists, Chico and Loco, who find themselves riding towards each other down a narrow lane. Chico wants to pass by safely, and he can only do this by cycling on the opposite side of the lane to Loco. So, he has two options: to cycle on the Right of the lane, or to cycle on the Left. Loco meanwhile is having a bad day and wants to crash into Chico, and the way he can achieve this is by cycling on the same side of the lane as Chico. So again, he has two options: to cycle on the Right of the lane, or to cycle on the Left. He does not care at all about hurting himself if they collide. (c) By constructing the best response lines of both players, identify all Nash equilibrium outcomes in the above game i.e., in pure and mixed strategies. (d) Provide an intuitive interpretation of the equilibrium outcome(s) identified in part (c) above.
There is a city, which looks like chopped isosceles triangle, as shown below. Citizens live uniformly distributed all over the city. Two ice-cream vendors, A and B, must independently set up stores in the city. Each citizen buys from the vendor closest to their location and when equidistant from both vendors they choose by coin toss. Each vendor’s aim is to maximize the expected number of customers. A choice of location by the two vendors is a Nash equilibrium if no vendor can do better by deviating unilaterally. Does this game have a Nash equilibrium? If so, describe it. If not, explain why not
Suppose a $1 bill is to be divided between two players according to a simultaneous-move, one-shot bargaining game. Is there a Nash equilibrium to the bargaining game if the smallest unit in which the money can be divided is $0.01? Assume that if the players ask for more in total than is available, they go home empty-handed.
Consider the 2-player, zero-sum game "Rock, Paper, Scissors". Each player chooses one of 3 strategies: rock, paper, or scissors. Then, both players reveal their choices. The outcome is determined as follows. If both players choose the same strategy, neither player wins or loses anything. Otherwise: • "paper covers rock": if one player chooses paper and the other chooses rock, the player who chose paper wins and is paid 1 by the other player. "scissors cut paper": if one player chooses scissors and the other chooses paper, the player who chose scissors wins and is paid 1 by the other player. "rock breaks scissors": if one player chooses rock and the other player chooses scissors, the player who chose rock wins and is paid 1 by the other player. We can write the payoff matrix for this game as follows: rock paper scissors rock 0 -1 1 paper 1 0 scissors -1 1 -1 0 2. Suppose now we alter the game so that whenever Colin chooses "paper" the loser pays the winner 3 instead of 1: rock paper…