In a survey, 35% of the respondents stated that they talk to their pets on the telephone. A veterinarian believed this result to be too high, so she randomly selected pet owners and discovered that 55 of them spoke to their pet on the telephone. Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? Use the a = 0.1 level of significa Click here to view the standard normal distribution table (page 1). Click here to view the standard normal distribution table (page 2). ..... What are the null and alternative hypotheses?

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
Pls help!
In a survey, 35% of the respondents stated that they talk to their pets on the telephone. A veterinarian believed this result to be too high, so she randomly selected 160 pet owners and discovered that 55 of them spoke to their pet on the telephone. Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? Use the α = 0.1 level of significance.

**Click here to view the standard normal distribution table (page 1).**

**Click here to view the standard normal distribution table (page 2).**

### What are the null and alternative hypotheses?
- \( H_0: \) [ ] versus \( H_1: \) [ ]

*(Type integers or decimals. Do not round.)*

### Determine the test statistic, \( z_0 \).
- \( z_0 = \) [ ]  
*(Round to two decimal places as needed.)*

### Determine the critical value(s).
Select the correct choice below and fill in the answer box to complete your choice.

*(Round to two decimal places as needed.)*

- A. \( z_{\alpha} = \) [ ]
- B. \( \pm z_{\alpha/2} = \pm \) [ ]

### Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical?
- A. The veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is not 35%.
- B. The veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is less than 35%.
- C. The veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is less than 35%.
- D. The veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is 35%.
Transcribed Image Text:In a survey, 35% of the respondents stated that they talk to their pets on the telephone. A veterinarian believed this result to be too high, so she randomly selected 160 pet owners and discovered that 55 of them spoke to their pet on the telephone. Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? Use the α = 0.1 level of significance. **Click here to view the standard normal distribution table (page 1).** **Click here to view the standard normal distribution table (page 2).** ### What are the null and alternative hypotheses? - \( H_0: \) [ ] versus \( H_1: \) [ ] *(Type integers or decimals. Do not round.)* ### Determine the test statistic, \( z_0 \). - \( z_0 = \) [ ] *(Round to two decimal places as needed.)* ### Determine the critical value(s). Select the correct choice below and fill in the answer box to complete your choice. *(Round to two decimal places as needed.)* - A. \( z_{\alpha} = \) [ ] - B. \( \pm z_{\alpha/2} = \pm \) [ ] ### Does the veterinarian have a right to be skeptical? - A. The veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is not 35%. - B. The veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is less than 35%. - C. The veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is less than 35%. - D. The veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets on the telephone is 35%.
### Hypothesis Testing of Pet Owners Talking to Pets on the Telephone

In a survey, 35% of the respondents stated that they talk to their pets on the telephone. A veterinarian believed this result to be too high, so she randomly selected 160 pet owners and discovered that 55 of them spoke to their pet on the telephone. We are tasked with determining if the veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. We will use the α = 0.1 level of significance.

#### Steps for Hypothesis Testing:

1. **Check the Assumptions:**
   - Verify if n * p₀ (1 - p₀) ≥ 10, where n represents the sample size, and p₀ represents the assumed proportion, in this case, 35%.
   - Confirm that the sample size is less than 5% of the population size.
   - Check if the sample is randomly selected and independent.

2. **Formulate the Hypotheses:**
   - **Null Hypothesis (H₀):** The proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets is 35% (p = 0.35).
   - **Alternative Hypothesis (H₁):** The proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets is not 35% (p ≠ 0.35).

3. **Compute the Test Statistic:**
   - Use the formula z₀ = \((\hat{p} - p₀) / \sqrt{(p₀(1 - p₀) / n)}\).
   - Round the result to two decimal places as needed.

4. **Determine the Critical Value(s):**
   - This depends on the level of significance and whether the test is one-tailed or two-tailed.

5. **Make a Decision:**
   - **Option A:** The veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion is not 35%.
   - **Option B:** The veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion is less than or greater than 35%.

### Additional Resources:
- [Click here to view the standard normal distribution table (page 1).](#)
- [Click here to view the standard normal distribution table (page 2).](#)

This framework helps in statistically analyzing whether the hypothesis about pet owners communicating with their pets via telephone holds true or
Transcribed Image Text:### Hypothesis Testing of Pet Owners Talking to Pets on the Telephone In a survey, 35% of the respondents stated that they talk to their pets on the telephone. A veterinarian believed this result to be too high, so she randomly selected 160 pet owners and discovered that 55 of them spoke to their pet on the telephone. We are tasked with determining if the veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. We will use the α = 0.1 level of significance. #### Steps for Hypothesis Testing: 1. **Check the Assumptions:** - Verify if n * p₀ (1 - p₀) ≥ 10, where n represents the sample size, and p₀ represents the assumed proportion, in this case, 35%. - Confirm that the sample size is less than 5% of the population size. - Check if the sample is randomly selected and independent. 2. **Formulate the Hypotheses:** - **Null Hypothesis (H₀):** The proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets is 35% (p = 0.35). - **Alternative Hypothesis (H₁):** The proportion of pet owners who talk to their pets is not 35% (p ≠ 0.35). 3. **Compute the Test Statistic:** - Use the formula z₀ = \((\hat{p} - p₀) / \sqrt{(p₀(1 - p₀) / n)}\). - Round the result to two decimal places as needed. 4. **Determine the Critical Value(s):** - This depends on the level of significance and whether the test is one-tailed or two-tailed. 5. **Make a Decision:** - **Option A:** The veterinarian has a right to be skeptical. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion is not 35%. - **Option B:** The veterinarian does not have a right to be skeptical. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the true proportion is less than or greater than 35%. ### Additional Resources: - [Click here to view the standard normal distribution table (page 1).](#) - [Click here to view the standard normal distribution table (page 2).](#) This framework helps in statistically analyzing whether the hypothesis about pet owners communicating with their pets via telephone holds true or
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman