Answered: ims that she hired Eric in May to paint…

ims that she hired Eric in May to paint her house by the end of July. Is this contract goverened by the Statute of Frauds?

CONCEPTS IN FED.TAX.,2020-W/ACCESS

20th Edition

ISBN:9780357110362

Author:Murphy

Publisher:Murphy

Chapter1: Federal Income Taxation—an Overview

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 61P: Inga, an attorney, completed a job for a client in November 2019. If she bills the client...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In September, Amina hired Bryan as a delivery man. Bryan was to commence work on 1 November. On 1 October, Amina wrote to Bryan telling him that, despite their agreement, economic circumstances were such that she no longer required his services. Can Bryan sue Amina? Explain your answers in light of the principles learned on breach of contract. (maximum 500 words)
Joanna takes a security interest in the equipment in Jason Store and files a financing statement claiming “equipment and all after acquired equipment.” Berkeley later sells Jason Store a cash register, taking a security interest in the register, and (a) files nine days after Jason receives the register or (b) files twenty-five days after Jason receives the register. If Jason fails to pay both Joanna and Berkeley and they foreclose their security interests, who has priority on the cash register? Explain.
Due to his debt to Chur, Schwyz wrote a promissory note which is payable to the order of Chur. Chur's sister, Sion, misrepresenting herself as agent of Chur, obtained the note from Schwyz. Sion then negotiated the note to Lausanne after forging the signature of Chur. May Lausanne enforce the note against Schwyz? a. Yes, since Schwyz is the principal debtor. b. No, since it is Chur who can enforce it, the note being payable to the order of Chur. c. No, since the signature of Chur was forged. d. Yes, since Schwyz, as maker, is primarily liable on the note.
Alice owns a contracting company that receives most of its business through government contracts. A new procurement officer with a government agency implies to Alice that if she does not send him a bribe for her latest awarded contract, she will not get any further contracts. If Alice loses future contracts, her business will fail. She reluctantly gives the officer a bribe. Has Alice committed a violation? A. Yes, because Alice was not under economic duress. B. Yes, because being extorted is not a defense to giving a bribe. C. No, because Alice was under economic duress. D. No, because Alice was not the one who proposed the bribe.
Phyllis maintained an IRA account at the brokerage firm ABC. On February 11 of the current year, she requested a check for the balance of her account. She received the check made out in her name and deposited it the same day in a new IRA account at the brokerage firm XYZ. Phyllis then requested a check on May 8 from XYZ, which was deposited in another new IRA account 35 days later. Is the May 8 distribution taxable to Phyllis?
Joe is a return preparer who completes Paul's return on March 1. Joe presents it to Paul for his signature on April 1. The return is due on April 15, but Pau does not pay Joe until June 1. Joe must furnish a copy of the return to Paul no later than?
Adrian is a salesperson who represents several wholesale companies. On January 2, 2019, she receives by mail a commission check from Ace Distributors in the amount of $10,000 and dated December 30, 2018. Adrian is concerned about the year in which the $10,000 is taxable. Although the check is dated 2018, she contends that it would have been unreasonable for her to drive the 50 miles to the Ace offices on a holiday to collect the check. Further, Adrian maintains that even if she had made the trip on a holiday to collect the check, by the time she returned home, her bank would have closed and she could not have received credit for the check until after the first of the year. Adrian would like you to determine whether she should include the $10,000 on her 2018 or 2019 tax return.
Jake is an IRS tax law - certified volunteer preparer at a VITA/TCE site. When preparing a return for Jill, Jake learns that Jill does not have a bank account to receive a direct deposit of her refund. Jill is distraught when Jake tells her the paper refund check will take three to four weeks longer than the refund being direct deposited. Jill asks Jake if he can deposit her refund in his bank account and then turn the money over to her when he gets it. What should Jake do?
In order to improve the cash flow of the company, Neal Emerald decided to postpone depositing all employment taxes a few months ago. He told his sales manager, “I’ll pay up before the IRS catches up with me.” What risks does Emerald face by not upholding his responsibility for the collection and payment of employment taxes?
Alan purchased shoes from Barbara on open account. Barbara sent Alan a bill for $10,000. Alan wrote back that two hundred pairs of the shoes were defective and offered to pay $6,000 and give Barbara his promissory note for $1,000. Barbara accepted the offer, and Alan sent his check for $6,000 and his note, in accordance with the agreement. Barbara cashed the check, collected on the note, and one month later sued Alan for $3,000. Is Barbara bound by her acceptance of the offer?
Althea writes a check to Handy Dan's Home Repair for $59.75 to cover the cost of having a window repaired in her home and gives the check to Dan, the owner of Handy Dan's Home Repair. Dan alters the check by changing the amount to $559.75. Dan then takes the check to Home Federal Savings and Loan, the bank on which the check is drawn, and cashes the check. This, of course, results in an extra $500 being withdrawn from Althea's account. Home Federal Savings and Loan will be responsible for: issuing a stop payment order on the check. debiting Althea's account $559.75, the entire amount of the check. debiting Althea's account for nothing. Because the check was altered, Althea is not entitled to any reimbursement. debiting Althea's account $500.
Willy signs a lease to open a law office. The state legislature outlaws the private practice of law, thus rendering the lease worthless. When Willy fails to pay the rent, the landlord files a suit against Willy. Willy's best defense is that the purpose of the lease has been frustrated. an accord and satisfaction has occurred. a novation has occurred. the lease violated the Statue of Frauds.