Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Probability
Imagine that a different researcher looks at these results and disagrees with them, arguing that happy people tend to listen to more prosocial music than unhappy people, and they also tend to be more cooperative. How might Greitemeyer respond to this criticism? O a. You're right, I hadn't considered this alternative explanation. O b. You're right, correlation is not causation. O c. Because I manipulated the IV, I ruled out this alternative explanation. O d. Because I randomized participants to condition, I ruled out this alternative explanation.

Imagine that a different researcher looks at these results and disagrees with them, arguing that happy people tend to listen to more prosocial music than unhappy people, and they also tend to be more cooperative. How might Greitemeyer respond to this criticism? O a. You're right, I hadn't considered this alternative explanation. O b. You're right, correlation is not causation. O c. Because I manipulated the IV, I ruled out this alternative explanation. O d. Because I randomized participants to condition, I ruled out this alternative explanation.

A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
10th Edition
ISBN:9780134753119
Author:Sheldon Ross
Publisher:Sheldon Ross
Chapter1: Combinatorial Analysis
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1P: a. How many different 7-place license plates are possible if the first 2 places are for letters and...
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
A1
The following is a description of a study that was not assigned in class. Your job is to interpret the main results of this study, which are provided here. An experimental study by Greitemeyer (2009) examined the effects of listening to prosocial music on cooperative behavior. He randomly assigned participants to listen to prosocial songs or neutral songs, and then assessed how cooperative they were using a modified Tangram task. He was also interested in two types of responses to this music: empathy (an emotional response) and prosocial thoughts (a cognitive response) The image below summarizes his results. Use this image to answer questions 15-20: B = .48, p< .01 B= .37, p< .05 %D Empathy Type of song Cooperative behavior Accessibility of prosocial thoughts B= .09, p= .56 B= .37, p< .05 Note: For "Type of Song", positive B means that the prosocial condition scor d higher than the neutral condition; negative B means that the prosocial condition scored lower than the neutral condition.
Transcribed Image Text:The following is a description of a study that was not assigned in class. Your job is to interpret the main results of this study, which are provided here. An experimental study by Greitemeyer (2009) examined the effects of listening to prosocial music on cooperative behavior. He randomly assigned participants to listen to prosocial songs or neutral songs, and then assessed how cooperative they were using a modified Tangram task. He was also interested in two types of responses to this music: empathy (an emotional response) and prosocial thoughts (a cognitive response) The image below summarizes his results. Use this image to answer questions 15-20: B = .48, p< .01 B= .37, p< .05 %D Empathy Type of song Cooperative behavior Accessibility of prosocial thoughts B= .09, p= .56 B= .37, p< .05 Note: For "Type of Song", positive B means that the prosocial condition scor d higher than the neutral condition; negative B means that the prosocial condition scored lower than the neutral condition.
Question 19 Imagine that a different researcher looks at these results and disagrees with them, arguing that happy people tend to listen to more prosocial music than unhappy people, and they also tend to be more cooperative. How might Greitemeyer respond to this criticism? O a. You're right, I hadn't considered this alternative explanation. b. You're right, correlation is not causation. O c. Because I manipulated the IV, I ruled out this alternative explanation. O d. Because I randomized participants to condition, I ruled out this alternative explanation. Question 2O Imagine that a different researcher looks at these results and remains unconinced by the measure of cooperative behavior. She does not think that a "modified Tangram task" approximates any form of real cooperative behavior that people care about in everyday life. This researcher is questioning the of this study. O a. internal validity O b. external validity O c. IV manipulation O d. statistical significance
Transcribed Image Text:Question 19 Imagine that a different researcher looks at these results and disagrees with them, arguing that happy people tend to listen to more prosocial music than unhappy people, and they also tend to be more cooperative. How might Greitemeyer respond to this criticism? O a. You're right, I hadn't considered this alternative explanation. b. You're right, correlation is not causation. O c. Because I manipulated the IV, I ruled out this alternative explanation. O d. Because I randomized participants to condition, I ruled out this alternative explanation. Question 2O Imagine that a different researcher looks at these results and remains unconinced by the measure of cooperative behavior. She does not think that a "modified Tangram task" approximates any form of real cooperative behavior that people care about in everyday life. This researcher is questioning the of this study. O a. internal validity O b. external validity O c. IV manipulation O d. statistical significance
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
Probability
ISBN:
9780134753119
Author:
Sheldon Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON
A First Course in Probability
A First Course in Probability
Probability
ISBN:
9780321794772
Author:
Sheldon Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS