Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
Psychology
III. Dr. Garcia is upset by the tough review with seemingly unreasonable demands, and considers quickly submitting the paper to a specialty journal. But her two postdocs realize that their future job prospects would weaken as a result. They argue forcefully that the reviewer was unfair, and say they can quickly complete the experiments to resolve each concern to get the high-visibility publication. Although Dr. Garcia believes that the research findings are valid whether or not they agree with one's hypothesis, she gives her postdocs a free hand because she trusts them, knowing they received many hours of research ethics training. Also, getting this high-visibility publication will strengthen her site visit review next year. 1. Is there an ethical "slippery slope" when a lab tries to obtain specific results for paper acceptance? 2. How can emotional reactions to bad reviews affect subsequent decision making? 3. If only one of several reviewers raises a subtle but potentially important issue, is it acceptable to pull the paper and submit elsewhere, hoping the issue won't be raised in a fresh review? 4. Besides more specialized or less-competitive journals, what are "predatory journals"? 5. How do trainees in your group learn research ethics and best research practices?

III. Dr. Garcia is upset by the tough review with seemingly unreasonable demands, and considers quickly submitting the paper to a specialty journal. But her two postdocs realize that their future job prospects would weaken as a result. They argue forcefully that the reviewer was unfair, and say they can quickly complete the experiments to resolve each concern to get the high-visibility publication. Although Dr. Garcia believes that the research findings are valid whether or not they agree with one's hypothesis, she gives her postdocs a free hand because she trusts them, knowing they received many hours of research ethics training. Also, getting this high-visibility publication will strengthen her site visit review next year. 1. Is there an ethical "slippery slope" when a lab tries to obtain specific results for paper acceptance? 2. How can emotional reactions to bad reviews affect subsequent decision making? 3. If only one of several reviewers raises a subtle but potentially important issue, is it acceptable to pull the paper and submit elsewhere, hoping the issue won't be raised in a fresh review? 4. Besides more specialized or less-competitive journals, what are "predatory journals"? 5. How do trainees in your group learn research ethics and best research practices?

Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
5th Edition
ISBN:9780134477961
Author:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Chapter1: The Science Of Psychology
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1TY
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
2,3,& 5
### Ethical Considerations in Academic Publishing #### Case Study III: Dr. Garcia's Dilemma Dr. Garcia is upset by the tough review with seemingly unreasonable demands and considers quickly submitting the paper to a specialty journal. But her two postdocs realize that their future job prospects would weaken as a result. They argue forcefully that the reviewer was unfair, and say they can quickly complete the experiments to resolve each concern to get the high-visibility publication. Although Dr. Garcia believes that the research findings are valid whether or not they agree with one’s hypothesis, she gives her postdocs a free hand because she trusts them, knowing they received many hours of research ethics training. Also, getting this high-visibility publication will strengthen her site visit review next year. #### Discussion Questions 1. **Is there an ethical “slippery slope” when a lab tries to obtain specific results for paper acceptance?** 2. **How can emotional reactions to bad reviews affect subsequent decision making?** 3. **If only one of several reviewers raises a subtle but potentially important issue, is it acceptable to pull the paper and submit elsewhere, hoping the issue won’t be raised in a fresh review?** 4. **Besides more specialized or less-competitive journals, what are “predatory journals”?** 5. **How do trainees in your group learn research ethics and best research practices?** --- ### Explanation: This scenario explores the ethical challenges and decision-making processes associated with academic publishing. Below, we delve deeper into some of the points raised in the discussion questions: 1. **Ethical “Slippery Slope”**: The concept of a "slippery slope" in ethics refers to a small first step that might lead to a chain of related events culminating in a significant (usually negative) effect. In this context, the pressure to obtain specific results for publication can lead to unethical practices, such as data manipulation, selective reporting, or ignoring conflicting data. 2. **Emotional Reactions to Reviews**: Negative reviews can be disheartening and may affect the morale of researchers. Emotional responses can influence objectivity, potentially prompting rash decisions like hastily resubmitting to a different journal without adequately addressing feedback. 3. **Reviewers’ Concerns**: If a reviewer points out a significant issue, the ethical approach would entail addressing it comprehensively. Submitting elsewhere to avoid the same scrutiny may result in perpetuating potential flaws or oversights in the
Transcribed Image Text:### Ethical Considerations in Academic Publishing #### Case Study III: Dr. Garcia's Dilemma Dr. Garcia is upset by the tough review with seemingly unreasonable demands and considers quickly submitting the paper to a specialty journal. But her two postdocs realize that their future job prospects would weaken as a result. They argue forcefully that the reviewer was unfair, and say they can quickly complete the experiments to resolve each concern to get the high-visibility publication. Although Dr. Garcia believes that the research findings are valid whether or not they agree with one’s hypothesis, she gives her postdocs a free hand because she trusts them, knowing they received many hours of research ethics training. Also, getting this high-visibility publication will strengthen her site visit review next year. #### Discussion Questions 1. **Is there an ethical “slippery slope” when a lab tries to obtain specific results for paper acceptance?** 2. **How can emotional reactions to bad reviews affect subsequent decision making?** 3. **If only one of several reviewers raises a subtle but potentially important issue, is it acceptable to pull the paper and submit elsewhere, hoping the issue won’t be raised in a fresh review?** 4. **Besides more specialized or less-competitive journals, what are “predatory journals”?** 5. **How do trainees in your group learn research ethics and best research practices?** --- ### Explanation: This scenario explores the ethical challenges and decision-making processes associated with academic publishing. Below, we delve deeper into some of the points raised in the discussion questions: 1. **Ethical “Slippery Slope”**: The concept of a "slippery slope" in ethics refers to a small first step that might lead to a chain of related events culminating in a significant (usually negative) effect. In this context, the pressure to obtain specific results for publication can lead to unethical practices, such as data manipulation, selective reporting, or ignoring conflicting data. 2. **Emotional Reactions to Reviews**: Negative reviews can be disheartening and may affect the morale of researchers. Emotional responses can influence objectivity, potentially prompting rash decisions like hastily resubmitting to a different journal without adequately addressing feedback. 3. **Reviewers’ Concerns**: If a reviewer points out a significant issue, the ethical approach would entail addressing it comprehensively. Submitting elsewhere to avoid the same scrutiny may result in perpetuating potential flaws or oversights in the
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780134477961
Author:
Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:
PEARSON
Cognitive Psychology
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337408271
Author:
Goldstein, E. Bruce.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and …
Psychology
ISBN:
9781337565691
Author:
Dennis Coon, John O. Mitterer, Tanya S. Martini
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:
9780393265156
Author:
Sarah Grison, Michael Gazzaniga
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a…
Psychology
ISBN:
9781285763880
Author:
E. Bruce Goldstein
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Psychology
ISBN:
9781305652958
Author:
Duane P. Schultz, Sydney Ellen Schultz
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS