If you compute the surface area of a sphere as the volume of revolution of the parametric curve c(t) = (cos t, sin t), as t ranges from 0 to 27. you get 0. If you use the same parametrization, but restrict t to the range from () to T, you get 47 (the correct surface area for the sphere of radius 1). Why did you get 0 when t ranged from () to 27? O Having closed the circle parametrized by c, the displacement is zero, so the surface area is zero. O Sine has the same (unsigned) area of its positive part on 0, 27 as its negative part, but on 0, 7|, it is all positive. So the sine contribution cancels out on the longer interval and not on the shorter interval. O Correct. The contribution from t e [0, 7| is exactly cancelled by t e T, 27| because the positive contributions for y(t) = cos tin the first interval are exactly cancelled by the negative contributions in the second interval. O The arc length contribution from the upper semicircle is negative because x' (t) < 0 on that semicircle and the arc length contribution from the lower semicircle is negative because y(t) < 0 on that semicircle. So the contribution from the two semicircles cancels.
If you compute the surface area of a sphere as the volume of revolution of the parametric curve c(t) = (cos t, sin t), as t ranges from 0 to 27. you get 0. If you use the same parametrization, but restrict t to the range from () to T, you get 47 (the correct surface area for the sphere of radius 1). Why did you get 0 when t ranged from () to 27? O Having closed the circle parametrized by c, the displacement is zero, so the surface area is zero. O Sine has the same (unsigned) area of its positive part on 0, 27 as its negative part, but on 0, 7|, it is all positive. So the sine contribution cancels out on the longer interval and not on the shorter interval. O Correct. The contribution from t e [0, 7| is exactly cancelled by t e T, 27| because the positive contributions for y(t) = cos tin the first interval are exactly cancelled by the negative contributions in the second interval. O The arc length contribution from the upper semicircle is negative because x' (t) < 0 on that semicircle and the arc length contribution from the lower semicircle is negative because y(t) < 0 on that semicircle. So the contribution from the two semicircles cancels.
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
Related questions
Question
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 3 images
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,