If total paid admissions are expected to be abc for (a) Blockbusters and (b) Goodlooking?

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
10th Edition
ISBN:9781259964947
Author:Libby
Publisher:Libby
Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1Q
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
CASE:
Blockbusters Incorporated, a leading producer of movies, is currently negotiating with Liam
Goodlooking, the biggest box-office attraction in the movie industry, to star in an adventure film.
For a starring role, Liam normally receives a salary of $20,000,000 plus 5% of the receipts to the
producer. (The producer normally receives 40% of the total paid admissions wherever the movie is
shown.) However, Liam is quite optimistic about the prospects of the film and has expressed some
interests in a special contract that would give him only 25% of his normal salary but increase his
portion of the receipts to the producer to 20%. Other than Goodlooking's pay, costs of producing
the picture are expected to be $45,000,000.
Both the producing company and prospective star have given further thought to the contract terms|
and concluded that some provision probably should be made for revenues to be earned from
contracts authorizing showings of the movie on television. After lengthy negotiations,
Goodlooking's agent proposed the following terms:
(a) a payment of $10,000,000, plus
(b) 15% of the receipts to the producer from theatre admissions, plus
(c) 10% of the revenues from sales of television rights.
Blockbuster's negotiating team leaves the negotiations to study the potential effect of the new
compensation scheme.
A study of past productions indicates that the producer can expect revenues from sales of television
rights to be approximately one-eighth (12.5%) of producer's revenues from theatre admissions.
Blockbusters' president is pleased with the opportunity to lower the fixed-payment part of the
contract but is concerned about the magnitude of the two off-the-top percentages.
The president of Blockbusters Incorporated has reviewed the preliminary analysis of the two
contract alternatives and wishes to give further consideration to the arrangement with
Goodlooking.
Goodlooking's agent also having second thoughts about the alternatives and is wondering what is
best for his client.
Transcribed Image Text:CASE: Blockbusters Incorporated, a leading producer of movies, is currently negotiating with Liam Goodlooking, the biggest box-office attraction in the movie industry, to star in an adventure film. For a starring role, Liam normally receives a salary of $20,000,000 plus 5% of the receipts to the producer. (The producer normally receives 40% of the total paid admissions wherever the movie is shown.) However, Liam is quite optimistic about the prospects of the film and has expressed some interests in a special contract that would give him only 25% of his normal salary but increase his portion of the receipts to the producer to 20%. Other than Goodlooking's pay, costs of producing the picture are expected to be $45,000,000. Both the producing company and prospective star have given further thought to the contract terms| and concluded that some provision probably should be made for revenues to be earned from contracts authorizing showings of the movie on television. After lengthy negotiations, Goodlooking's agent proposed the following terms: (a) a payment of $10,000,000, plus (b) 15% of the receipts to the producer from theatre admissions, plus (c) 10% of the revenues from sales of television rights. Blockbuster's negotiating team leaves the negotiations to study the potential effect of the new compensation scheme. A study of past productions indicates that the producer can expect revenues from sales of television rights to be approximately one-eighth (12.5%) of producer's revenues from theatre admissions. Blockbusters' president is pleased with the opportunity to lower the fixed-payment part of the contract but is concerned about the magnitude of the two off-the-top percentages. The president of Blockbusters Incorporated has reviewed the preliminary analysis of the two contract alternatives and wishes to give further consideration to the arrangement with Goodlooking. Goodlooking's agent also having second thoughts about the alternatives and is wondering what is best for his client.
If total paid admissions are expected to be about $300 million, which scheme, R or S, is better
for (a) Blockbusters and (b) Goodlooking?
Transcribed Image Text:If total paid admissions are expected to be about $300 million, which scheme, R or S, is better for (a) Blockbusters and (b) Goodlooking?
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Rate Of Return
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259964947
Author:
Libby
Publisher:
MCG
Accounting
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Accounting
ISBN:
9780134475585
Author:
Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Intermediate Accounting
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259722660
Author:
J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259726705
Author:
John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting Principles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education