If all of your behavior is ethical, then, according to the categorical imperative, you are willing to have your life story printed in The New York Times. Thus, you needn’t be concerned about the data and business intelligence created about you. However, consider the following: Suppose, as the most junior member of a club, you are required to purchase beer for your club’s bi-monthly beer fest. To obtain a substantial discount from the vendor, you use your customer loyalty card for thesepurchases. A data aggregator obtains your purchase history and classifies you as a heavy drinker. Unknown to you, the data aggregator informs your medical insurance company of its classification. Your insurance premiums increase, and you never know why. Using either the categorical imperative or utilitarianism, is there an ethical problem here?
If all of your behavior is ethical, then, according to the categorical imperative, you are willing to have your life story printed in The New York Times. Thus, you needn’t be concerned about the data and business intelligence created about you. However, consider the following:
Suppose, as the most junior member of a club, you are required to purchase beer for your club’s bi-monthly beer fest. To obtain a substantial discount from the vendor, you use your customer loyalty card for these
purchases. A data aggregator obtains your purchase history and classifies you as a heavy drinker. Unknown to you, the data aggregator informs your medical insurance company of its classification. Your insurance premiums increase, and you never know why. Using either the categorical imperative or utilitarianism, is there an ethical problem here?
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
