I Weight loss program based on exercise more effecttve than a program based on diet? The 44 overwelght people put on a strict one year exercise program lost an average of 30 pounds with a standard devlation of 10 pounds. The 50 overweight people put on a strict one year diet lost an average of 25 pounds with a standard deviation of 9 pounds. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of signtficance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answerv Select an answerv Select an answerv (please enter a decimal) H: Select an answerv Select an answervSelect an answerv (Please enter a decimal) C. The test statistic ?v = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. The p-value is ?v a f. Based on this, we should Select an answerv the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... O The results are statistically insigntficant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean weight loss on the exercise program is more than the population mean weight loss on the diet. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is stațistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean weight loss on the exercise program is equal to the population mean weight loss on the diet. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean weight loss for the 44 participants on the exercise program is more than the mean weight loss for the 50 participants on the diet. O The results are statiştically significant at a 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean weight loss on the exercise program is more than the population mean weight loss on the diet. h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. O If the sample mean weight loss for the 44 participants on the exercise program is the same as the sample mean weight loss for the 50 participants on the diet and if another 44 participants on the exercise program and 50 participants on the diet are weighed then there would be a 0.65% chance of concluding that the mean weight loss for the 44 participants on the exercise program is at least 5 pounds more tban the mean weiaht loSs for the 50inarticinants on the diet
I Weight loss program based on exercise more effecttve than a program based on diet? The 44 overwelght people put on a strict one year exercise program lost an average of 30 pounds with a standard devlation of 10 pounds. The 50 overweight people put on a strict one year diet lost an average of 25 pounds with a standard deviation of 9 pounds. What can be concluded at the a = 0.01 level of signtficance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Ho: Select an answerv Select an answerv Select an answerv (please enter a decimal) H: Select an answerv Select an answervSelect an answerv (Please enter a decimal) C. The test statistic ?v = (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. The p-value is ?v a f. Based on this, we should Select an answerv the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... O The results are statistically insigntficant at a = 0.01, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean weight loss on the exercise program is more than the population mean weight loss on the diet. O The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.01, so there is stațistically significant evidence to conclude that the population mean weight loss on the exercise program is equal to the population mean weight loss on the diet. O The results are statistically significant at a = 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean weight loss for the 44 participants on the exercise program is more than the mean weight loss for the 50 participants on the diet. O The results are statiştically significant at a 0.01, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population mean weight loss on the exercise program is more than the population mean weight loss on the diet. h. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. O If the sample mean weight loss for the 44 participants on the exercise program is the same as the sample mean weight loss for the 50 participants on the diet and if another 44 participants on the exercise program and 50 participants on the diet are weighed then there would be a 0.65% chance of concluding that the mean weight loss for the 44 participants on the exercise program is at least 5 pounds more tban the mean weiaht loSs for the 50inarticinants on the diet
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Concept explainers
Contingency Table
A contingency table can be defined as the visual representation of the relationship between two or more categorical variables that can be evaluated and registered. It is a categorical version of the scatterplot, which is used to investigate the linear relationship between two variables. A contingency table is indeed a type of frequency distribution table that displays two variables at the same time.
Binomial Distribution
Binomial is an algebraic expression of the sum or the difference of two terms. Before knowing about binomial distribution, we must know about the binomial theorem.
Topic Video
Question
Repost
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 4 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman