I asked this question yesterday: Suppose that, in each period, the cost of a security either goes up by a factor of 2 or goes down by a factor of 1/2 (i.e. u=2, d=1/2).  If the initial price of the security is 100, determine the no-arbitrage cost of a call option to purchase the security at the end of two periods for a price of 150. In the answer I got today the first step said:  "We assume that the probability of moving up and moving down be 50% each, which means equal chances for both the movements. " I had learned that the risk neutral probability for the stock price to go up is: p=(1+r-d)/(u-d).  In this particular problem, we'd have p=(1+0-.5)/(2-.5)=1/3.  And so the probability going down would be 1-p or 2/3.   Thus, my question is why weren't these probabilities used in the solution previously sent?  And if they should be, what would be the new solution to the problem?  Thank you for your help.  I'm new to learning all of this and some of it is hard for me to understand.

Essentials Of Investments
11th Edition
ISBN:9781260013924
Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Chapter1: Investments: Background And Issues
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1PS
icon
Related questions
Question
100%

I asked this question yesterday:

Suppose that, in each period, the cost of a security either goes up by a factor of 2 or goes down by a factor of 1/2 (i.e. u=2, d=1/2).  If the initial price of the security is 100, determine the no-arbitrage cost of a call option to purchase the security at the end of two periods for a price of 150.

In the answer I got today the first step said:  "We assume that the probability of moving up and moving down be 50% each, which means equal chances for both the movements. "

I had learned that the risk neutral probability for the stock price to go up is:

p=(1+r-d)/(u-d).  In this particular problem, we'd have

p=(1+0-.5)/(2-.5)=1/3.  And so the probability going down would be 1-p or 2/3.  

Thus, my question is why weren't these probabilities used in the solution previously sent?  And if they should be, what would be the new solution to the problem?  Thank you for your help.  I'm new to learning all of this and some of it is hard for me to understand.

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Arbitrage
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials Of Investments
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE
FUNDAMENTALS OF CORPORATE FINANCE
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013962
Author:
BREALEY
Publisher:
RENT MCG
Financial Management: Theory & Practice
Financial Management: Theory & Practice
Finance
ISBN:
9781337909730
Author:
Brigham
Publisher:
Cengage
Foundations Of Finance
Foundations Of Finance
Finance
ISBN:
9780134897264
Author:
KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William
Publisher:
Pearson,
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…
Finance
ISBN:
9781337395250
Author:
Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…
Finance
ISBN:
9780077861759
Author:
Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education