How to turn this paragraph into a personal opinion? Unlike Davis and Moore's belief in meritocracy, Tumin argues for a more critical analysis of the origins of social inequality. He proposes that inequality is not only determined by personal merit but is also shaped by systemic elements like resource availability, bias, and power structures. Tumin’s point highlights the importance of addressing structural obstacles that impede social mobility and continue to perpetuate inequality. Tumin's counterargument challenges Davis and Moore's simplistic view of social inequality by emphasizing its complexities and nuances. Tumin encourages a more nuanced understanding of the root causes of stratification in society, reminding us to consider the broader societal context in which inequality exists. While Davis and Moore offer valuable insights into the benefits of social hierarchy, Tumin's critique urges a more comprehensive examination of the underlying issues driving social inequality.
How to turn this paragraph into a personal opinion?
Unlike Davis and Moore's belief in meritocracy, Tumin argues for a more critical analysis of the origins of social inequality. He proposes that inequality is not only determined by personal merit but is also shaped by systemic elements like resource availability, bias, and power structures. Tumin’s point highlights the importance of addressing structural obstacles that impede social mobility and continue to perpetuate inequality.
Tumin's counterargument challenges Davis and Moore's simplistic view of social inequality by emphasizing its complexities and nuances. Tumin encourages a more nuanced understanding of the root causes of stratification in society, reminding us to consider the broader societal context in which inequality exists. While Davis and Moore offer valuable insights into the benefits of social hierarchy, Tumin's critique urges a more comprehensive examination of the underlying issues driving social inequality.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
