How to turn this paragraph into a personal opinion? Additionally, Tumin brings attention to the matter of accessibility, pointing out that some individuals may face obstacles such as poverty, limited education, or discrimination that prevent them from reaching well-compensated roles. These obstacles may stop skilled individuals from pursuing or reaching positions that they are capable of, showing that the system is not as meritocratic as Davis and Moore claim. Tumin claims that these inconsistencies and obstacles result in a malfunction in the stratification system, challenging the theory's belief that it efficiently distributes rewards according to Davis and Moore's meritocratic explanation of social inequality. They believe that social stratification is an essential and innate aspect of society, as it guarantees that highly skilled individuals are placed in roles that match their abilities. According to them, inequality inspires people to put in more effort and aim for success, which contributes to social advancement. Nevertheless, Tumin offers a critique of this viewpoint by pointing out the weaknesses in their reasoning. Tumin highlights that Davis and Moore's theory neglects to account for the impact of societal obstacles on people's ability to progress despite their abilities. He contends that elements like race, gender, and socio-economic status can restrict opportunities for specific people, resulting in an uneven playing field. Additionally, Tumin brings up concerns regarding the validity of the standards utilized for assessing merit, as they frequently exhibit bias and are impacted by cultural norms.
How to turn this paragraph into a personal opinion?
Additionally, Tumin brings attention to the matter of accessibility, pointing out that some individuals may face obstacles such as poverty, limited education, or discrimination that prevent them from reaching well-compensated roles. These obstacles may stop skilled individuals from pursuing or reaching positions that they are capable of, showing that the system is not as meritocratic as Davis and Moore claim. Tumin claims that these inconsistencies and obstacles result in a malfunction in the stratification system, challenging the theory's belief that it efficiently distributes rewards according to Davis and Moore's meritocratic explanation of social inequality. They believe that social stratification is an essential and innate aspect of society, as it guarantees that highly skilled individuals are placed in roles that match their abilities. According to them, inequality inspires people to put in more effort and aim for success, which contributes to social advancement. Nevertheless, Tumin offers a critique of this viewpoint by pointing out the weaknesses in their reasoning.
Tumin highlights that Davis and Moore's theory neglects to account for the impact of societal obstacles on people's ability to progress despite their abilities. He contends that elements like race, gender, and socio-economic status can restrict opportunities for specific people, resulting in an uneven playing field. Additionally, Tumin brings up concerns regarding the validity of the standards utilized for assessing merit, as they frequently exhibit bias and are impacted by cultural norms.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
