How should i respond to this post? In my portfolio project on addressing obesity in Weld County, there’s a clear conflict between deontological and utilitarian ethics. From a deontological perspective, it makes sense to push for strict policies like banning junk food ads, taxing sugary drinks, or making nutrition education mandatory. These actions align with the duty to protect public health, no matter the cost. But the utilitarian view, which is all about the greatest good for the most people, raises some concerns. For instance, taxing sugary drinks might help reduce obesity, but it could also hit low-income communities harder. Similarly, banning food ads might harm small businesses. The utilitarian challenge is balancing the benefits of these interventions with the potential harm they might cause. Finding a middle ground between these ethical approaches will be key to creating interventions that improve public health without causing unintended harm.
How should i respond to this post?
In my portfolio project on addressing obesity in Weld County, there’s a clear conflict between deontological and utilitarian ethics. From a deontological perspective, it makes sense to push for strict policies like banning junk food ads, taxing sugary drinks, or making nutrition education mandatory. These actions align with the duty to protect public health, no matter the cost. But the utilitarian view, which is all about the greatest good for the most people, raises some concerns. For instance, taxing sugary drinks might help reduce obesity, but it could also hit low-income communities harder. Similarly, banning food ads might harm small businesses. The utilitarian challenge is balancing the benefits of these interventions with the potential harm they might cause. Finding a middle ground between these ethical approaches will be key to creating interventions that improve public health without causing unintended harm.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
