How does punishment differ from negative reinforcement?
How does punishment differ from negative reinforcement?
An inquiry that consistently springs up in behavioral psychology is the thing that the thing that matters is between negative reinforcement and punishment. The disarray is understandable on the grounds that the two forms of control have aversive upgrades implanted within them, at the end of the day something that the organism needs to stay away from.
Where they contrast at that point is in their outcomes. Punishment attempts to make the behavior being rebuffed stop, while negative reinforcement attempts to make the behavior being negatively reinforced happen more often.
We are negatively reinforced by a wide range of things that wind up leading to great results really. For instance, it's negatively reinforcing to be out in the cold rain and so we take cover, which shields us from getting wiped out. It's negatively reinforcing to get terrible grades at school or get awful audits at work so we invest more effort, which assists us with doing better. It's negatively reinforcing to get a speeding ticket so we drive as far as possible, which protects us on the streets. The explanation every one of these models are viewed as negative reinforcements, not punishments, is that there are explicit indicated behaviors that the organism can perform to escape from the aversive improvements.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
