Answered: How can we prevent a central processing…

Name: How can we prevent a central processing unit from wasting cycles whil
Uploaded: 2024-03-20T06:51:23.000Z
Channel: Bartleby
Description: How can we prevent a central processing unit from wasting cycles whileprocessing multiple instructions? What's most important about thisapproach? Explain their effect.

Engineering

Computer Science

How can we prevent a central processing unit from wasting cycles while processing multiple instructions? What's most important about this approach? Explain their effect.

Systems Architecture

7th Edition

ISBN:9781305080195

Author:Stephen D. Burd

Publisher:Stephen D. Burd

Chapter4: Processor Technology And Architecture

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2PE: If a microprocessor has a cycle time of 0.5 nanoseconds, what’s the processor clock rate? If the...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

How does pipelining improve CPU efficiency? What’s the potential effect on pipelining’s efficiency when executing a conditional BRANCH instruction? What techniques can be used to make pipelining more efficient when executing conditional BRANCH instructions?
When it comes to process execution, what is the advantage of first allocating it to the I/O queue and then pushing it to the CPU when it is ready? What, in your opinion, will happen if the I/O is not completed correctly? Is the CPU burst going to be affected? What do you mean?
How can we stop a central processing unit from squandering cycles by processing a huge number of instructions all at once? How much does the availability of certain resources affect the viability of carrying out this strategy? Provide an instance of one of the results they generate.
When a CPU interrupt occurs, the processor comes to a halt and responds to the signal. Why should the process be halted so that this duty may be completed? Let's start with the pausing procedure and then go on to the carrying out process. explain?
When an interrupt occurs, the CPU suspends its current activity and returns to serving the next process. Is a postponement of the execution necessary? Instead, how about simply doing the operation and leaving the rest to us?
Because of this, the CPU suspends any currently executing processes until the interrupt has been resolved. Interrupt service is the term used to describe this. What is the rationale for halting the procedure that is presently in progress? Isn't it possible, as an alternative, to just finish the presently operating operation and deal with the interruption afterward?
In what ways might the I/O queue benefit from being prioritised above the process execution queue when it's possible? Who knows what will happen if the I/O is disrupted. It's not clear whether this will affect the CPU's maximum burst rate. I'm not quite sure what you're referring about.
Please explain how prioritizing the I/O queue above the process execution queue might improve performance. If the I/O is interrupted, who knows what will happen. To what extent this will reduce the maximum burst rate of the CPU is unclear. I don't think I understand what you're getting at.
What are some ways that we can stop a central processing unit from wasting time by trying to execute a large number of instructions all at once? What kind of implications does the absence of certain resources have on the practicability of putting this approach into action? Provide an example of the kind of work that you might anticipate receiving from them in this regard.
When a CPU interrupt occurs, the processor comes to a halt and reacts to the signal. Why should the process be halted so that this duty may be completed? Let's start with the pausing procedure and then go on to the carrying out process. Explain?
What are the benefits of assigning process execution to the I/O queue first when it is possible to do so? What do you think will take place in the event that the I/O is interrupted? Will this have an effect on the maximum burst rate that the CPU is capable of? I'm not sure I understand what you mean by that.
When a CPU receives an interrupt, it must stop what it is doing and respond to the signal received from the interrupt source.Why should the operation be halted in order to complete this task?Let's start with the interrupting process and then move on to the interrupting execution process.explain?