This exercise refers to the drunk driving panel data regression summarized below.Regression Analysis of the Effect of Drunk Driving Laws on Traffic DeathsDependent variable: traffic fatility rate (deaths per 10,000).RegressorBeer taxDrinking age 18Drinking age 19Drinking age 20Drinking ageMandatory jail orcommunity service?Average vehiclemiles per driverUnemployment rateReal income per capita(logarithm)YearsState Effects?Time effects?(1)0.41*(0.056)1982-88nono(2)(3) (4)-0.62** -0.76*** -0.42(0.39)(0.33) (0.38)0.023(0.078)-0.014(0.084)-0.023 -0.075(0.053) (0.064)0.034 -0.109***(0.058) (0.058)noyesyesnoyesClustered standard errors?yesyesF-Statistics and p-Values Testing Exclusion of Groups of VariablesTime effects=0(5)-0.76**(0.36)0.041 0.083(0.111) (0.115)0.006 0.015(0.005) (0.011)-0.068*(0.016)1.66*(0.66)1982-88 1982-88 1982-88 1982-88yesyesyesyesyesyes(6)-0.46(0.39)-0.004(0.022)0.043(0.101)0.007(0.005)-0.064*(0.011)1.56*(0.63)1982-88yesyesyes10.483.9210.144.92(0.002) (<0.001) (0.005) (<0.001)1.57(0.299)0.33(0.716)29.15(<0.001)0.986(7)-0.94*(0.32)0.043(0.106)-0.061(0.103)- 0.118(0.125)31.16(<0.001)0.9820.092(0.164)0.124(0.048)-0.098*(0.022)1.07(0.64)1982 & 1988onlyyesyesyes37.82(<0.001)0.41(0.797)25.77(<0.001)0.803Drinking age coefficients = 0Unemployment rate,income per capita = 0R²0.0910.8020.8890.892These regressions were estimated using panel data for 48 U.S. states. Regressions (1) through (6) use data for all years1982 to 1988, and regression (7) uses data from 1982 and 1988 only. Standard errors are given in parentheses under thecoefficients, and p-values are given in parentheses under the F-statistics. The individual coefficient is statistically significantat the ***10%, **5%, or *1% significance level.New Jersey has a population of 6.3 million people. Suppose that New Jersey increased the tax on a case of beer by $1 (in 1988 dollars). Use the results in column (4) to predict the number of lives that would be saved over the next year.The predicted number of lives that would be saved over the next year is(Round your response to two decimal places)

Here we are given the regression result where the dependent variable is "traffic fatality rate…

his exercise refers to the drunk driving panel data regression summarized below. Regression Analysis of the Effect of Drunk Driving Laws on Traffic Deaths Dependent variable: traffic fatility rate (deaths per 10,000). Regressor Beer tax Drinking age 18 Drinking age 19 Drinking age 20 Drinking age Mandatory jail or community service? Average vehicle miles per driver Unemployment rate Real income per capita (logarithm) Years State Effects? Time effects? (1) 0.41" (0.056) 1982-88 no no (2) (3) -0.62** -0.76*** (0.39) (0.33) no 1982-88 yes no yes yes Clustered standard errors? yes yes F-Statistics and p-Values Testing Exclusion of Groups of Variables (6) (4) (5) -0.42 -0.76** -0.46 (0.38) (0.36) (0.39) 0.023 -0.014 (0.078) (0.084) -0.023 -0.075 (0.053) (0.064) 0.034 -0.109*** (0.058) (0.058) 0.041 (0.111) 0.006 (0.005) -0.068* (0.016) 1.66* (0.66) 0.083 (0.115) 0.015 (0.011) yes yes yes -0.004 (0.022) 0.043 (0.101) 0.007 (0.005) -0.064" (0.011) 1.56 1.07 (0.63) (0.64) 1982-88 1982-88 1982-88 1982-88 1982 & 1988 only yes yes yes (7) -0.94" (0.32) yes yes yes 0.043 (0.106) -0.061 (0.103) -0.118 (0.125) 0.092 (0.164) 0.124 (0.048) -0.098 (0.022) yes yes yes

his exercise refers to the drunk driving panel data regression summarized below. Regression Analysis of the Effect of Drunk Driving Laws on Traffic Deaths Dependent variable: traffic fatility rate (deaths per 10,000). Regressor Beer tax Drinking age 18 Drinking age 19 Drinking age 20 Drinking age Mandatory jail or community service? Average vehicle miles per driver Unemployment rate Real income per capita (logarithm) Years State Effects? Time effects? (1) 0.41" (0.056) 1982-88 no no (2) (3) -0.62 -0.76* (0.39) (0.33) no 1982-88 yes no yes yes Clustered standard errors? yes yes F-Statistics and p-Values Testing Exclusion of Groups of Variables (6) (4) (5) -0.42 -0.76 -0.46 (0.38) (0.36) (0.39) 0.023 -0.014 (0.078) (0.084) -0.023 -0.075 (0.053) (0.064) 0.034 -0.109* (0.058) (0.058) 0.041 (0.111) 0.006 (0.005) -0.068* (0.016) 1.66* (0.66) 0.083 (0.115) 0.015 (0.011) yes yes yes -0.004 (0.022) 0.043 (0.101) 0.007 (0.005) -0.064" (0.011) 1.56 1.07 (0.63) (0.64) 1982-88 1982-88 1982-88 1982-88 1982 & 1988 only yes yes yes (7) -0.94" (0.32) yes yes yes 0.043 (0.106) -0.061 (0.103) -0.118 (0.125) 0.092 (0.164) 0.124 (0.048) -0.098 (0.022) yes yes yes

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

In an OLS regression, which value represents the "best" R2 in terms of explained variance in the dependent variable? A. 2.53 B. 16.22 C. .001 D. 0.53
5.2 42 The following regression shows the impact of the number of rooms (ROOM) on the monthly rent of an apartment (in thousand Rands) (RENT) from a sample of 42 randomly chosen apartments in Parow: Dependent Variable: RENT Variable C ROOM r-square: 0.7180 Parameter -0.7705 2.1331 SE of regression: 2.3397 Std. Error 0.8233 0.2114 sample size = 42 What will be values of the parameters, variance and standard errors of the parameters, estimated variance of error terms, coefficient of determination and correlation coefficient, if RENT is measured in Rands and there is no change to the unit of measurement of the ROOM variable?
Help!
None
An analyst working for your firm provided an estimated log-linear demand function based on the natural logarithm of the quantity sold, price, and the average income of consumers. Results are summarized in the following table: SUMMARY OUTPUT Regression Statistics Multiple R R Square Adjusted R Square Standard Error Observations ANOVA Regression Residual Total Intercept LN Price LN Income df 0.968 0.937 0.933 0.003 30 SS MS F 2 0.003637484 0.001818742 202.48598 0.000242516 8.98206E-06 27 29 0.00388 Coefficients Standard Error 0.57 0.00 0.13 0.51 -0.08 0.15 t Stat 0.90 -19.50 1.13 P-value 0.37 0.00 0.27 Significance F 5.55598E-17 Lower 95% -0.65 -0.09 -0.12 How would a 4 percent increase in income impact the demand for your product? Demand would increase by 60 percent. Demand would increase by 0.6 percent. Demand would decrease by 60 percent. Demand would decrease by 0.6 percent. Upper 95% 1.68 -0.07 0.41
Please provide me with the correct answer, along with the calculations, and do not use any AI tools
Disposable income, the amount left after taxes have been paid, is one measure of the health of the economy. Using U.S. Energy Information Administration data for selected years from 2015 and projected to 2040, the U.S. real disposable income per capita (in dollars) can be approximated by the equation I = 707.6t + 39,090 where t is the number of years after 2015. (a) What t-value corresponds to 2021? t = (b) Find the predicted U.S. per capita real disposable income (to the nearest $10) in 2021. $ (c) In what year is the U.S. per capita real disposable income expected to exceed $55,000? Extreme Protection, Inc. manufactures helmets for skiing and snowboarding. The fixed costs for one model of helmet are $6600 per month. Materials and labor for each helmet of this model are $55, and the company sells this helmet to dealers for $85 each. (Let x represent the number of helmets sold. Let C, R, and P be measured in dollars.) (a) For this helmet, write the function for monthly total costs…
QUESTION 10 Answer questions 10 to 16 based on the regression outputs given in Table 1& 2. Table 1 DATA4-1: Data on single family homes in University City community of San Diego, in 1990. price - sale price in thousands of dollars (Range 199. 9 505) sqft - square feet of living area (Range 1065 - 3000) Table 2 Model 1: OLS, using observations 1-14 Dependent variable: price coefficient std. error t-ratio p-value 52. 3509 0.138750 37. 2855 0.0187329 0. 1857 8. 20e-06 *** const sqft 7. 407 Me dependent var Sun squared resid R-squared F(1, 12) Log-likelihood Schwarz criterion 317. 4929 18273. 57 0. 820522 54. 86051 -70. 08421 145. 4465 Hannan-Quinn S.D. dependent var S.E. of regression Adjusted R-squared P-value (F) Akaike criterion 88. 49816 39. 02304 0. 805565 8. 20e-06 144. 1684 144. 0501 There are observations included in this dataset. It is a. data. O 12; cross-sectional 13; time-series data 14; cross-sectional In this regression model, sale price of a single-family house is the. the…
6) Suppose you have the following data on the price of orange and the quantity sold: Price per Pound (in Quantity Sold (in Dollars) Pounds) 0.50 0.75 1.00 1.25 1.50 10 7 699 5 2 Assume that the quantity sold (Y) is a linear function of the price (X), i.e. Y₁ =B₁ + B₂X₁ + ε₁ Estimate the population regression coefficients. (Do not use Computer)
Thirty data points on Y and X are employed to estimate the parameters in the linear relation Y = a + bX. The computer output from the regression analysis is DEPENDENT VARIABLE: R-SQUARE F-RATIO P-VALUE ON F OBSERVATIONS: 30 0.5300 13.79 0.0009 VARIABLE PARAMETER STANDARD T-RATIO P-VALUE ESTIMATE ERROR INTERCEPT 93.54 46.210 2.02 0.0526 -3.25 0.875 -3.71 0.0009 The percentage of the total variation in Y NOT explained by the regression is percent,
q11-
Q1