Here is the description of the study again: In the study, 32 participants putted a golf ball to a 5- centimeter golf cup. Each participant attempted a total of 20 putts. The researchers wrote, "A downward-facing projector displayed a ring of 11 small (3.8 centimeters in diameter) or 5 large (28 centimeters) circles around each hole to create an Ebbinghaus illusion." For each illusion, participants "attempted 10 putts from a distance of 3.5 meters, and we recorded how many putts dropped into the hole" (Witt et al., 2012, p. 397). The researchers hypothesized that participants would make more putts when the hole was surrounded by smaller čircles (making the hole appear larger) than when it was surrounded by larger circles (making the hole appear smaller). What was the dependent variable in this experiment? O A. The dependent variable in thiexperiment was the 32 participants. O B. The dependent variable in this experiment was the number of putts each participant made. O C. The dependent variable in this experiment was the actual size of the golf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller. O D. The dependent variable in this experiment was the apparent size of the golf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller.
Here is the description of the study again: In the study, 32 participants putted a golf ball to a 5- centimeter golf cup. Each participant attempted a total of 20 putts. The researchers wrote, "A downward-facing projector displayed a ring of 11 small (3.8 centimeters in diameter) or 5 large (28 centimeters) circles around each hole to create an Ebbinghaus illusion." For each illusion, participants "attempted 10 putts from a distance of 3.5 meters, and we recorded how many putts dropped into the hole" (Witt et al., 2012, p. 397). The researchers hypothesized that participants would make more putts when the hole was surrounded by smaller čircles (making the hole appear larger) than when it was surrounded by larger circles (making the hole appear smaller). What was the dependent variable in this experiment? O A. The dependent variable in thiexperiment was the 32 participants. O B. The dependent variable in this experiment was the number of putts each participant made. O C. The dependent variable in this experiment was the actual size of the golf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller. O D. The dependent variable in this experiment was the apparent size of the golf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller.
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
Transcribed Image Text:RESEARCH DESIGN: CAN A VISUALILLUSION IMPROVE SPORTS PERFORMANCE? 4 OF 9
Here is the description of the study again: In the study, 32 participants putted a golf ball to a 5-
centimeter golf cup. Each participant attempted a total of 20 putts. The researchers wrote, "A
downward-facing projector displayed a ring of 11 small (3.8 centimeters in diameter) or 5 large (28
centimeters) circles around each hole to create an Ebbinghaus illusion." For each illusion,
participants "attempted 10 putts from a distance of 3.5 meters, and we recorded how many putts
dropped into the hole" (Witt et al., 2012, p. 397). The researchers hypothesized that participants
would make more putts when the hole was surrounded by smaller čircles (making the hole appear
larger) than when it was surrounded by larger circles (making the hole appear smaller).
What was the dependent variable in this experiment?
O A. The dependent variable in thirexperiment was the 32 participants.
O B. The dependent variable in this experiment was the number of putts each participant made.
O C. The dependent variable in this experiment was the actual size of the golf hole, and its levels were
larger or smaller.
D. The dependent variable in this experiment was the apparent size of the golf hole, and its levels were
larger or smaller.
P Type here to search
8
DI
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman