Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
Here is the description of the study again: In the study, 32 participants putted a golf ball to a 5- centimeter golf cup. Each participant attempted a total of 20 putts. The researchers wrote, "A downward-facing projector displayed a ring of 11 small (3.8 centimeters in diameter) or 5 large (28 centimeters) circles around each hole to create an Ebbinghaus illusion." For each illusion, participants "attempted 10 putts from a distance of 3.5 meters, and we recorded how many putts dropped into the hole" (Witt et al., 2012, p. 397). The researchers hypothesized that participants would make more putts when the hole was surrounded by smaller circles (making the hole appear larger) than when it was surrounded by larger circles (making the hole appear smaller). What was the independent variable in this experiment? O A. The independent variable in this experiment was the 32 participants. O B. The independent variable in this experiment was the number of successful putts that each participant made. O C. The independent variable in this experiment was the actual size of the golf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller. O D. The independent variable in this experiment was the apparentrsize of the golf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller. SUBMIT 15°C

Here is the description of the study again: In the study, 32 participants putted a golf ball to a 5- centimeter golf cup. Each participant attempted a total of 20 putts. The researchers wrote, "A downward-facing projector displayed a ring of 11 small (3.8 centimeters in diameter) or 5 large (28 centimeters) circles around each hole to create an Ebbinghaus illusion." For each illusion, participants "attempted 10 putts from a distance of 3.5 meters, and we recorded how many putts dropped into the hole" (Witt et al., 2012, p. 397). The researchers hypothesized that participants would make more putts when the hole was surrounded by smaller circles (making the hole appear larger) than when it was surrounded by larger circles (making the hole appear smaller). What was the independent variable in this experiment? O A. The independent variable in this experiment was the 32 participants. O B. The independent variable in this experiment was the number of successful putts that each participant made. O C. The independent variable in this experiment was the actual size of the golf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller. O D. The independent variable in this experiment was the apparentrsize of the golf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller. SUBMIT 15°C

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
Here is the description of the study again: In the study, 32 participants putted a golf ball to a 5- centimeter golf cup. Each participant attempted a total of 20 putts. The researchers wrote, "A downward-facing projector displayed a ring of 11 small (3.8 centimeters in diameter) or 5 large (28 centimeters) circles around each hole to create an Ebbinghaus illusion." For each illusion, participants "attempted 10 putts from a distance of 3.5 meters, and we recorded how many putts dropped into the hole" (Witt et al., 2012, p. 397). The researchers hypothesized that participants would make more putts when the hole was surrounded by smaller circles (making the hole appear larger) than when it was surrounded by larger circles (making the hole appear smaller). What was the independent variable in this experiment? O A. The independent variable in this experiment was the 32 participants. O B. The independent variable in this experiment was the number of successful putts that each participant made. O C. The independent variable in this experiment was the actual size of the golf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller. O D. The independent variable in this experiment was the apparentrsize of the golf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller. SUBMIT 8. 15°C
Transcribed Image Text:Here is the description of the study again: In the study, 32 participants putted a golf ball to a 5- centimeter golf cup. Each participant attempted a total of 20 putts. The researchers wrote, "A downward-facing projector displayed a ring of 11 small (3.8 centimeters in diameter) or 5 large (28 centimeters) circles around each hole to create an Ebbinghaus illusion." For each illusion, participants "attempted 10 putts from a distance of 3.5 meters, and we recorded how many putts dropped into the hole" (Witt et al., 2012, p. 397). The researchers hypothesized that participants would make more putts when the hole was surrounded by smaller circles (making the hole appear larger) than when it was surrounded by larger circles (making the hole appear smaller). What was the independent variable in this experiment? O A. The independent variable in this experiment was the 32 participants. O B. The independent variable in this experiment was the number of successful putts that each participant made. O C. The independent variable in this experiment was the actual size of the golf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller. O D. The independent variable in this experiment was the apparentrsize of the golf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller. SUBMIT 8. 15°C
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Follow-up Questions
Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.
Follow-up Question
Here is the description of the study again: In the study, 32 participants putted a golf ball to a 5- centimeter golf cup. Each participant attempted a total of 20 putts. The researchers wrote, "A downward-facing projector displayed a ring of 11 small (3.8 centimeters in diameter) or 5 large (28 centimeters) circles around each hole to create an Ebbinghaus illusion." For each illusion, participants "attempted 10 putts from a distance of 3.5 meters, and we recorded how many putts dropped into the hole" (Witt et al., 2012, p. 397). The researchers hypothesized that participants would make more putts when the hole was surrounded by smaller circles (making the hole appear larger) than when it was surrounded by larger circles (making the hole appear smaller). What was the dependent variable in this experiment? O A. The dependent variable in this experiment was the 32 participants. O B. The dependent variable in this experiment was the number of putts each participant made. O C. The dependent variable in this experiment was the actual size of the gotf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller. O D. The dependent variable in this experiment wabthe apparent size of the golf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller. SUBMIT Type here to search
Transcribed Image Text:Here is the description of the study again: In the study, 32 participants putted a golf ball to a 5- centimeter golf cup. Each participant attempted a total of 20 putts. The researchers wrote, "A downward-facing projector displayed a ring of 11 small (3.8 centimeters in diameter) or 5 large (28 centimeters) circles around each hole to create an Ebbinghaus illusion." For each illusion, participants "attempted 10 putts from a distance of 3.5 meters, and we recorded how many putts dropped into the hole" (Witt et al., 2012, p. 397). The researchers hypothesized that participants would make more putts when the hole was surrounded by smaller circles (making the hole appear larger) than when it was surrounded by larger circles (making the hole appear smaller). What was the dependent variable in this experiment? O A. The dependent variable in this experiment was the 32 participants. O B. The dependent variable in this experiment was the number of putts each participant made. O C. The dependent variable in this experiment was the actual size of the gotf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller. O D. The dependent variable in this experiment wabthe apparent size of the golf hole, and its levels were larger or smaller. SUBMIT Type here to search
Solution
Bartleby Expert
SEE SOLUTION
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS