Groups: 1 = 5-25 years, 2 = 26-59 years, 3= 60-92 yearsWhat can you conclude about mean differences for Groups 2 and 3?Group of answer choices:1. FIQ for Group 2 differs from the FIQ of Group 32. FIQ for Group 2 is higher than the FIQ of Group 33. FIQ for Group 2 is lower than the FIQ of Group 34. FIQ for Group 2 is not different from the FIQ of Group 3 + OnewayDescriptivesWAIS-R full scale IQ95% Confidence Interval forMeanNMeanStd. Deviation Std. Error Lower Bound Upper BoundMinimumMaximumPost Hoc Tests5-25 Years185107.1511.946878105.41108.887714626-59 Years380108.4012.840.659107.11109.7073150110.65114.15Multiple Comparisons60-92 Years185112.4012.052.88681143Total750109.0812.572459108.18109.9873150Dependent Variable: WAIS-R full scale IQBonferroniANOVAMeanDifference (I-J)95% Confidence IntervalWAIS-R full scale IQ() Subjects age in years (J) Subjects age in yearsStd. ErrorSig.Lower Bound Upper BoundSum ofSquaresdfMean SquareFSi.5-25 Years26-59 Years-1.2571.115.780-3.931.42Between Groups2905.50221452.7519.398<.001-5.2541.293<.00160-92 Years-8.36-2.15Within Groups115472.857747154.58226-59 Years5-25 Years1.2571.115.780-1.423.93Total118378.35974960-92 Years-3.997.001-6.671.115-1.32ANOVA Effect Sizes60-92 Years5-25 Years5.2541.293<.0012.158.3626-59 Years3.9971.115.0011.326.6795% Confidence IntervalPointEstimateLowerUpper*. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.WAIS-R full scale 1Q Eta-squared.025.006.049Epsilon-squared.022.004.046Omega-squared Fixed-.022.004.046effectOmega-squaredRandom-effect.011.002.024a. Eta-squared and Epsilon-squared are estimated based on the fixed-effect model.

Groups of people according to their age limit.Group 1 - Age group 5-25 yearsGroup 2 - Age group…

Groups: 1 = 5-25 years, 2 = 26-59 years, 3= 60-92 years What can you conclude about mean differences for Groups 2 and 3? Group of answer choices: 1. FIQ for Group 2 differs from the FIQ of Group 3 2. FIQ for Group 2 is higher than the FIQ of Group 3 3. FIQ for Group 2 is lower than the FIQ of Group 3 4. FIQ for Group 2 is not different from the FIQ of Group 3

Groups: 1 = 5-25 years, 2 = 26-59 years, 3= 60-92 years What can you conclude about mean differences for Groups 2 and 3? Group of answer choices: 1. FIQ for Group 2 differs from the FIQ of Group 3 2. FIQ for Group 2 is higher than the FIQ of Group 3 3. FIQ for Group 2 is lower than the FIQ of Group 3 4. FIQ for Group 2 is not different from the FIQ of Group 3

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Choose the best statement to summarize the association shown between hat size and IQ in the scatterplot below. Hat Size O The scatterplot does not show a trend that would indicate an association between hat size and IQ scores. O As hat size increases, IQ scores tend to decrease. O As hat size increases, IQ scores tend to increase. Hat size causes IQ to increase.
What is the median?
What is the dependent and independent variable in the sentence below? What is the relationship between genderand A level of exam results?
Why we use here n= 30 Not n=45 And what is the meaning of n=45 in this question
How to find 20th, 25th, 65th, and 75th, percentiles for data value of 15, 21, 24, 24, 27, 28, 30, 35?
I need help finding the median, QI, Q3, IQR, Range. Please!
Theory of attribute . Class and class frequencies. Forumlas .....
11. The median of the data: 19, 25, 59, 48, 35, 31, 30, 32, 51. If 25 is replaced by 52, what will be the new median.
What do degrees of freedom for degree of freedom within reflect?
A: {3, 5, 5, 5, 7} B: {5, 7, 7, 9, 9} median of A median of B V
A child says that the median of 3 , 14 , 18 ,20 , 5 is 18 .What doesn't the child understood about finding the median?
Determine the mean of math proficiency scores of students taught by the Standard Method. Determine the median of math proficiency scores of students taught by the New Method. Determine the median of math proficiency scores of students taught by the Standard Method. Determine the mean of math proficiency scores of students taught by the New Method.