Gray Company was granted a patent on January 1, 2018 and appropriately capitalized P450,000 of related costs. The entity was amortizing the patent over the useful life of 15 years. During 2021, the entity paid P150,000 in legal costs in successfully defending an attempted infringement of the patent. After the legal action was completed, the entity sold the patent to the plaintiff for P750,000. The policy is to take no amortization in the year of disposal. What amount should be reported as gain from sale of patent in 2021? a. 150,000 b. 240,000 C. 270,000 d. 390,000

Gray Company was granted a patent on January 1, 2018 and appropriately capitalized P450,000 of related costs. The entity was amortizing the patent over the useful life of 15 years. During 2021, the entity paid P150,000 in legal costs in successfully defending an attempted infringement of the patent. After the legal action was completed, the entity sold the patent to the plaintiff for P750,000. The policy is to take no amortization in the year of disposal. What amount should be reported as gain from sale of patent in 2021? a. 150,000 b. 240,000 C. 270,000 d. 390,000

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

On October 1, 2014, PHINEAS Acquired the net assets of FERB which resulted to goodwill. When PHINEAS issued its December 31, 2014 financial statements, the valuation of an acquired trademark was incomplete. PHINEAS used $1,000,000 as provisional fair value of trademarks and determined a 5-year amortization life. PHINEAS appropriately disclosed in its December 31, 2014 financial statements that the trademark was measured at a provisional amount. On April 30, 2015, the valuation of the trademark was finalized. The fair value of the acquisition date amounted to $21,200,000. How much is the increase (decrease) of the Goodwill in December 31, 2015?
Colgate Co. bought a trademark from Crest Corp. on May 1, 2019 for P300,000. Its unamortized cost on Crest's accounting records was P112,000. Colgate decided to amortize the trademark over its legal life from the date of purchase. In Colgate's December 31, 2019, Financial Position what amount should the trademark be reported?
9. During 2021, Rockon Company, Inc. incurred $240,000 in legal fees in defending a patent against an infringement with a carrying value of $2,500,000. Rockon’s lawyers were successful with the defense of the patent. The legal fees should be a. expensed in 2021 and classified as ordinary expenseb. classified as an extraordinary item on the income statement for 2021c. capitalized and amortized over the remaining legal life of the patentd. capitalized and amortized over the remaining economic life or legal life of the patent,whichever is shorter
During 2023, Lowry Company was used by a competitor for P5,000,000 infringement suit of a trademark. Based on the legal counsel's advice, Lowery accrued the sum of P3,000,000 as a provision. On February 15, 2024, the Supreme Court decided in favor of the party alleging the infringement and ordered the defendant to pay the aggrieved party a sum of P3,500,000. The financial statements of Lowry were approved by the BOD for issue on February 20, 2024. What amount should the Company accrue as provision for the year ended December 31, 2023? O 5,000,000 O 3,000,000 O 3,500,000
The airport land rights were given to XYZ Airlines on June. 30, 2021. On that date, the rights were valued at P15,000,000. The agreement gives the entity 30 years over those rights. The entity incurred equipment rearrangement costs as result of these rights. As of Dec. 31, 2021, the fair value of the rights significantly declined to P7,000,000 but XYZ sees an acceptable level of profits in the upcoming years. If the asset was recorded at fair value, how much is the carrying value of the airport land rights as of December 31, 2021?
On November 4, 2019, Blue Company acquired an asset (27.5-year residential real property) for $200,000 for use in its business. In 2019 and 2020, respectively, Blue deducted $642 and $5,128 of cost recovery. These amounts were incorrect; Blue applied the wrong percentages (i.c., those for 39 year rather than 27.5 year assets). Blue should have taken $910 and $7,272 cost recovery in 2019 and 2020, respectively. On January 1, 2021, the asset was sold for $180,000. If required, round all computations to the nearest dollar. Click here to access the depreciation tables in the textbook. a. The adjusted basis of the asset at the end of 2020 is $ b. The cost recovery deduction for 2021 is $ c. The loss on the sale of the asset in 2021 is
Berny Ltd owns 100 per cent of Cozy Ltd. On 1 July 2019 Berny Ltd sells an item of plant to Cozy Ltd for $3.6 million. This plant cost Berny $4.5 million and had accumulated depreciation of $1.8 million at the date of the sale. The remaining useful life of the plant is assessed as 12 years and the tax rate is 30 per cent. Required: a) Prepare the entries to eliminate the effects of the above intragroup transactions in the consolidation journal of Berny Ltd’s group at 30 June 2020 b) Prepare the entries to eliminate the effects of the above intragroup transactions in the consolidation journal of Berny Ltd’s group at 30 June 2021
Hagrid Inc. is subject to an acquisition of control (AOC) on January 1, 2023. The company has a business loss of $65,000 in its 2022 taxation year prior to the AOC, which cannot be carried back. On December 31, 2022, the company had two capital properties, land with an ACB of $150,000 and FMV of $65,000; and a depreciable property with a capital cost and ACB of $100,000, a UCC of $75,000 and a FMV of $200,000. Assuming Hagrid will continue in business and will return to profitability in 2023, what write downs and elections are available to Hagrid Inc. in order to optimize the amount of 2022 non-capital losses carried forward to the 2023 taxation year? Hagrid Inc. should elect to recognize the allowable capital loss of $42,500 on the land at the end of 2022. A capital gain on the depreciable property would be realized equal to $50,000 and there would be recapture of $25,000. Hagrid Inc. should elect to recognize the allowable capital loss of $42,500 on the land at the end of 2022. A…
Dazzle Corporation purchased a patent for P7,140,000 on January 2014. The patent is being amortized over the remaining legal life of 15 years expiring on January 2029. During 2017, Dazzle Corporation determined that the economic benefits of the patent would not last longer than ten years from the date of acquisition. Using the same information on number (33), what amount should be charged to patent amortization expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017, assuming there is no change in the patent's useful life? OP816,000 O P476,000 O None of the above OP571.200 OP4,896,000
On January 1, 2024, Nguyen Electronics leased equipment from Nevels Leasing for a four-year period ending December 31, 2027, at which time possession of the leased asset will revert back to Nevels. The equipment cost Nevels $779,677 and has an expected economic life of five years. Nevels expects the residual value on December 31, 2027, will be $103,000. Negotiations led to the lessee guaranteeing a $146,000 residual value. Equal payments under the lease are $203,000 and are due on December 31 of each year with the first payment being made on December 31, 2024. Nguyen is aware that Nevels used a 8% interest rate when calculating lease payments. Note: Use tables, Excel, or a financial calculator. (FV of $1, PV of $1, FVA of $1, PVA of $1, FVAD of $1 and PVAD of $1) Required: Prepare the appropriate entries for both Nguyen and Nevels on January 1, 2024, to record the lease. Prepare all appropriate entries for both Nguyen and Nevels on December 31, 2024, related to the lease.
Larkspur Limited purchased a patent for $86,400 on June 1, 2022. Larkspur has a calendar fiscal year end. Straight-line amortization is used for the patent, based on a five-year useful life, although the remaining legal life was 10 years. On May 31, 2024, Larkspur paid $28,800 in legal fees to successfully defend this patent in court and now wants to revise the estimate of the patent's remaining useful life to 8 years, which is the same as its remaining legal life. (a) (b) (c) (d) Record any necessary amortization prior to the change in the useful life of the patent. (Credit account titles are automatically indented when the amount is entered. Do not indent manually. If no entry is required, select "No Entry for the account titles and enter O for the amounts. List debit entry before credit entry)
On January 1, 2018, Don Company purchased a patent from an original patentee for 2,400,000. The remaining legal life of the patent is 15 years but the useful life is only 12 years. On January 1, 2019, the entity paid 550,000 in successfully defending the patent in an infringement suit files against the entity. On January 1, 2020, the entity acquired a competing patent for 1,500,000. The competing patent has a remaining legal life of 15 years but it is not to be used because it was intended to protect the original patent. What is the carrying amount of the patent on Dec 31, 2020? Question 33 options: 3,150,000 3,600,000 3,200,000 3,500,000