Gordon and Tess are trying to determine whether AABC and AFGE can be proven congruent through rigid motions. Gordon says that AABC AFGE because AABC can be reflected over the line x =1 to create AFGE. Tess says AABC= AFGE because AABC can be translated by the rule (x +5, y - 7) to create AFGE. 4 3 A 2 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1.2 3 4 5 6 7 8 E -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 Who is correct? F. 00 6 5. 1. B.

Elementary Geometry For College Students, 7e
7th Edition
ISBN:9781337614085
Author:Alexander, Daniel C.; Koeberlein, Geralyn M.
Publisher:Alexander, Daniel C.; Koeberlein, Geralyn M.
ChapterP: Preliminary Concepts
SectionP.CT: Test
Problem 1CT
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
Gordon and Tess are trying to determine whether AABC and AFGE can be proven congruent through rigid motions.
Gordon says that AABC AFGE because AABC can be reflected over the line x =1 to create AFGE.
Tess says AABC AFGE because AABC can be translated by the rule (x +5, y - 7) to create AFGE.
B
6
5.
4
3
A
2.
1.
-8 -7
-6 -5 -4
-3
-2
-1
-1
2 3
EC
4
5 6 7
-2
OF
-3
-4
-5
-6
G
-7
-8
Who is correct?
O Gordon only
Transcribed Image Text:Gordon and Tess are trying to determine whether AABC and AFGE can be proven congruent through rigid motions. Gordon says that AABC AFGE because AABC can be reflected over the line x =1 to create AFGE. Tess says AABC AFGE because AABC can be translated by the rule (x +5, y - 7) to create AFGE. B 6 5. 4 3 A 2. 1. -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 -1 2 3 EC 4 5 6 7 -2 OF -3 -4 -5 -6 G -7 -8 Who is correct? O Gordon only
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer