Given the following payoff matrix, who has a dominant strategy? B's strategies A's Strategies Raise price Lower price Enter (A gets 5, B gets 50) (A gets 20, B gets -50) a. both players b. B does; A doesn't c. neither player d. A does; B doesn't e. it depends on what the other player does Don't Enter (A gets 200, B gets 0) (A gets 50, B gets 0)

Given the following payoff matrix, who has a dominant strategy? B's strategies A's Strategies Raise price Lower price Enter (A gets 5, B gets 50) (A gets 20, B gets -50) a. both players b. B does; A doesn't c. neither player d. A does; B doesn't e. it depends on what the other player does Don't Enter (A gets 200, B gets 0) (A gets 50, B gets 0)

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter15: Oligopoly And Strategic Behavior

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 17P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

K In a game, there are two players: Player 1 and Player 2. They have two strategies to select from, A and B. Where the first payoff and the second payoff in every cell is for Player 1 and Player 2 respectively. Which of the following is an example of a game without a dominant strategy? (Check all that apply.) A. C. Player 1 Player 1 A B A B A 3,-3 1, 1 A 2,1 0,0 Player 2 Player 2 B 3, -3 5, -5 B 0,0 1,2 B. D. Player 1 Player 1 A B A B A 1,-1 -1, 1 Player 2 Player 2 A 3.5, -1.5 2.7, -1 B -1, 1 1,-1 B -5, 3 0,0 If the dominant strategy for Player 1 is selecting strategy A and the dominant strategy for Player 2 is strategy B, then A B is an example of a c From ame C Murat Çok Di id Kushn y My Hand
Sam and Sarah are thinking about getting married. However if either of them cheats on the other, they would get a payoff of 10, while the other person gets zero. If neither cheat, they stay with each other and get a payoff of 7 each and if both cheat, the relationship falls apart and each get a payoff of 1. What is the Nash equilibrium of this game? a. Cheat, Cheat b. Not cheat, Not cheat Sam cheats, Sarah doesn't Sarah cheats, Sam doesn't
The following payoff matrix represents a simultaneous-move game between two players: Kay and Jack. Each player has two choices: Black or White. The first number in each cell is the payoff to Kay, and the second number is the payoff to Jack. Jay Black White 50, 30, Black 50 30 Кay 45, 40, White 30 50 Refer to the scenario above. Which is true? a. This game has a dominant strategy equilibrium. b. This game has two dominant strategy equilibria. c. This game has two Nash equilibria. d. This game has one Nash equilibrium.
Solve for the Nash equilibrium (or equilibria) in each of the following games. (a) The following two-by-two game is a little harder to solve since firm 2’spreferred strategy depends of what firm 1 does. But firm 1 has a dominantstrategy so this game has one Nash equilibrium. Firm 2 Launch Don’tFirm 1 Launch 60, -10 100, 0 Don’t 80, 30 120, 0 What is the Nash equilibrium of this simultaneous-move game? (b) What would the outcome of this game be if instead firm 1 moved first and then, after seeing what firm 1 chose, firm 2 chose it strategy? In this case firm 1 doesn’t necessarily need to choose a best response, but firm 2 must choose a best response since it moves second.
1. A game may have more than one Nash equilibrium. T/F ? 2. A game has always at least one pure strategy Nash equilibrium. T/F? 3. A situation where everyone is playing a dominant strategy must be a Nash equilibrium. T/F?
Please look at the payoff matrix below which shows the benefits that would accrue to each player in a 2-player.non-sequential, non-repeated game. a) Identify the collusive (cooperative) equilibrium. b) Identify the secure strategy (maximin) equilibrium c) Identify the maximax equilibrium d) Identify the Nash equilibrium (You must clearly label each answer in eCourses to receive any credit for your answers.) Apple Inc. Strategy 1 Strategy 2 Strategy 3 20 40 60 60 1000 200 Strategy A 70 50 90 Banana 70 300 Inc. Strategy B 400 40 80 100 90 150 80 Strategy C
Game theory Consider a simultaneous move game with two players. Player 1 has three possible actions (A, B, or C) and Player 2 has two possible actions (D or E.) In the payoff matrix below, each cell contains the payoff for Player 1 followed by the payoff for Player 2. Player 2 7. Player 1 ہے A B C D -3, -3 0, -11 -4, 3 -11, E 0 -7, -7 -12, 0 (a) Identify any dominated strategies in this game. If there are none, state this clearly. (b) Identify any pure strategy Nash Equilibria in this game. If there are none, state this clearly.
Aedri Quick Lesson in Game Theory A Nash Equilibrium is an outcome in which neither player is better off by changing their strategy. 2.7 Is a Dominant Strategy equilibrium also a Nash equilibrium? a) Yes b) No esc The Ice Cream Guys $3.99 $4.99 + Chucky's Chunky CCT: $20,000 $3.99 ICG: $20,000 CCT: $60,000 ICG: $10,000 tab Treats CCT: $10,000 $4.99 ICG: $60,000 CCT: $40,000 ICG: $40,000 The table above is the payoff matrix for the annual profit of the only two ice-cream-truck firms operating in Beach City. They are deciding the price of an ice cream cone. %3D caps lo 2.8 What is Chucky's dominant strategy? a) $3.99 b) $4.99 c) Not enough information hift 2.9 What is the dominant strategy equilibrium in this situation? a) Both charge $3.99 b) Both charge $4.99 c) CCT charges $3.99 and ICG charges $4.99 d) CCT charges $4.99 and ICG charges $3.99 2.10 Suppose these two firms engaged in collusion (which, of course, totally doesn't happen because it is against the law). Which outcome would…
Suppose that Green Giant and Red Rover are two companies competing in the canned vegetable market. Each is contemplating an aggressive new ad campaign. The payoffs of each decision are listed below, where Green Giant is player 1. Green/Red Ad Campaign No Ad Campaign |Ad Campaign |1 million, 1 million zero, 3 million No Ad Campaign 3 million, zero 2 million, 2 million What is the Nash equilibrium of the game? a. (advertise, don't advertise) b. (advertise, advertise) c. (don't advertise, don't advertise) d. (don't advertise, advertise)
In this game, which of the following claim is wrong: X с D с D 2 3 Veuillez choisir une réponse. a. 2 0 0 1 3 1 This game is similar to the prisoner dilemma. b. Players do not always play the same best response. C. A the Nash equilibrium, the gains for each player is smaller than for other outcomes. d. D is a dominant strategy for player 1.
9. Little Kona is a small coffee company that is consider- ing entering a market dominated by Big Brew. Each company's profit depends on whether Little Kona enters and whether Big Brew sets a high price or a low price: Little Kona Enter Don't Enter High Price Kona makes $2 million Kona makes zero Big Brew Brew makes $3 million Brew makes $7 million Kona loses $1 million Low Price Kona makes zero Brew makes $1 million Brew makes $2 million
What term refers to the optimal action that a player can take, regardless of the opponents' actions? Oa Nash strategy a payoff strategy a cooperative strategy a dominant strategy