Given the domains m € MOVIES and c e CH ARACTERS and the following predicates: • SW(m): m is a Star Wars movie. • A(c, m): e is a character who appears in the movie m • D(c): c is a Droid. • L(m): I liked m. • Q(c, q): e says q (c is quoted as saying q.) • jarjar is the character Jar Jar Binks • bad is the quote: "I've got a bad feeling about this!" 1. Express the following English sentence with predicate logic using Existential and/or Universal quantifiers: I didn't like any Star Wars movie if Jar Jar Binks was in it. 2. Express the following English sentence with predicate logic using Existential and/or Universal quantifiers: At least two droids appear in every Star Wars movie. You may use the notation x = y and z # y as needed.

Given the domains m € MOVIES and c e CH ARACTERS and the following predicates: • SW(m): m is a Star Wars movie. • A(c, m): e is a character who appears in the movie m • D(c): c is a Droid. • L(m): I liked m. • Q(c, q): e says q (c is quoted as saying q.) • jarjar is the character Jar Jar Binks • bad is the quote: "I've got a bad feeling about this!" 1. Express the following English sentence with predicate logic using Existential and/or Universal quantifiers: I didn't like any Star Wars movie if Jar Jar Binks was in it. 2. Express the following English sentence with predicate logic using Existential and/or Universal quantifiers: At least two droids appear in every Star Wars movie. You may use the notation x = y and z # y as needed.

Computer Networking: A Top-Down Approach (7th Edition)

7th Edition

ISBN:9780133594140

Author:James Kurose, Keith Ross

Publisher:James Kurose, Keith Ross

Chapter1: Computer Networks And The Internet

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem R1RQ: What is the difference between a host and an end system? List several different types of end...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

I only need help with the last 3
Return a lambda function that takes in multiplier (the multiplier is a number) and returns a lambda function that will take in another number and will return the new input multiplied by the multiplier. def higher_order_lambdas(): Return a lambda function that takes in a multiplier and returns a lambda function that given an input return the input multiplied by the multiplier >>> hol = higher_order_lambdas () doubles = hol(2) >> doubles (3) 6 >>> hol = higher_order_lambdas() >> triples hol(3) >>> triples (4) 12 = "*** YOUR CODE HERE ***"
Let the domain be the set of all animals. Define the following predicates: A(x) : x can add. • W(x) : x can waltz. • D(x) : x is a dog. • C(x) : x is a cat. Translate each of the following logical expressions into English. 1. Vx(D(x) → (A(x) V W(x)). 2. Ex(C(x) A ¬A(x) ^ W(x)) 3. -3x(D(x) ^ A(x)) 4. Vx((D(x) V C(x)). → W(x))
Develop a system/application in Prolog that will allow grader to: load a set of student’s grades (see samples from the Table C below) query student’s final letter grade (A, B, C, etc.) by a given student’s name. query student(s) whose grade matches to the input letter grade (e.g., A). For example, show student(s) whose final letter grade is A. There are 3 types of grades for each student—HWs, Exams, and Project, with a weight of 20%, 40% and 40%, respectively, to the 100-point final. Table A and B show how the final grades (in points and letter) are computed. Table C shows samples of students’ grades. You will define the execution instructions to answer the following questions so that grader can test out your application in Prolog: how to load your source code to Prolog runtime/compiler how to load students’ grades to Prolog runtime/compiler how to query student’s letter grade how to query student(s) whose letter grade matches to an input letter grade Please DO NOT hard code any…
Let D be a set of dogs including the particular dogs Cardie (c) and Duncan (d). Define the following predicates on D: W(x) means "dog a likes walks", T(x) means “dog æ is a terrier", R(x) means "dog x is a Rottweiler", and S(x, y) means "dog a is smaller than dog y" or equivalently “dog y is larger than dog r". Using the first five of the statements below, prove the last statement using quantifier rules. (Translate the statements into symbolic ones before you start.) • Duncan is a terrier. • All terriers are smaller than Cardie. • Cardie is smaller than some Rottweiler. • If a first dog is smaller than a second dog, and the second is smaller than a third dog, then the first dog is smaller than the third. • All dogs like walks. • There is a Rottweiler who is larger than some terrier who likes walks.
CS 1105 Chapter 3 Question 7.4 Construct an NFA model that represents the language by the regular expression: x(y ∪ (xy)∗)(x ∪ yy)∗xy
Formalize the following sentence in english: Vx. (person(x ) A 3y. (like(x, y) ^ food(y) A-contain(cheese))) (12pt) 3 Arial T T T All person المسار: p 2:0LK 2 درجات السؤال 16 Formalize the following sentence in english: Vx3y. (xy = 1) !! T. (12pt) 3 Arial T TT
This is an Automata and Computation question on Functions/Sets.
These sentences are consistent: A-> (B*C) / B-> (D v ~E) / C -> (E v ~D) / A * E true or false?
Consider the predicate language with predicate symbol <, where x < y means that "x is an object different from y that comes before y"; (and = is the usual equality symbol). Choose the first-order logic formulas that correctly translate the sentence: "There exists an element that comes after all others". A. ∃x ∀y (y<x) B. ∃x ∀y (¬(y<x) → (y=x)) C. ∀x ∃y (x<y) D. ∃x ∀y ((y<x) ∨ (y=x))