4.05-2. Generalized forwarding: specifying a flow table entry (b). Consider the three-node network below, that uses flow-based generalized forwarding (e.g. as in OpenFlow) inthe network's routers. In the question below, we'll want to create match+action entries in the flow table at router r2, with three ports labelled 1,2.3 (in black). In the question,matches are constrained to be over only four fields: the IP source address, the IP destination address, the upper-layer protocol field of the IP datagram, and the destination portnumber of the transport-layer segment. The actions are either to drop or to forward(i). that is, to forward a matching packet on port i. The default action (uniess stated othenwise) isthat if a packet doesn't match a rule, it will be dropped.OpenFlowcontroller128.119/164353.106/1622.33/161matchactionsource IPdest. IPprotocoldest. portТСР(b) Suppose we want to implement the following behavior, and that the default configuration is that all traffic from 22.33/16 should be allowed to be forwarded by r2 to the outsidenetwork. However, we also want to implement a higher priority rule (which would be earlier in the table, for example) so that users within the 22.33/18 network are never allowedto connect to an external web server on port 80. Specify the flow table row entries to implement this rule, by indicating the column entries below. The * is a wildcard match, whichmatches everything - you should use * over more specific answers whenever possible.(Note: You can find more exarmples of problerrs simiar to this here|In the "source IP" column, the flow table entry should be:|In the "dest. IP" column, the flow table entry should be:|In the "dest port" column, the flow table entry should be:|In the "action" column, the flow table entry should be:A. 80B. 22.33/18C. 53.108/16D. 128.119/18E. dropF. UDPG. forward(1)H.*I. forward(2)

It is defined as a group of computers linked to each other that enables the computer to communicate…

Generalized forwarding: specifying a flow table entry (b). Consider the three-node network below, that uses flow-based generalized forwarding (e.g., as in OpenFlow work's routers. In the question below, wel want to create match+action entries in the flow table at router r2, with three ports labelled 1.2.3 (in black). In the question, es are constrained to be over only four fields: the IP source address, the IP destination address, the upper-layer protocol field of the IP datagram, and the destination port er of the transport-layer segment. The actions are either to drop or to forward(). that is, to forward a matching packet on port i. The default action (uniess stated otherwise) a packet doesn't match a rule, it will be dropped. COpenFlow controller 128.119/16 4 5

Generalized forwarding: specifying a flow table entry (b). Consider the three-node network below, that uses flow-based generalized forwarding (e.g., as in OpenFlow work's routers. In the question below, wel want to create match+action entries in the flow table at router r2, with three ports labelled 1.2.3 (in black). In the question, es are constrained to be over only four fields: the IP source address, the IP destination address, the upper-layer protocol field of the IP datagram, and the destination port er of the transport-layer segment. The actions are either to drop or to forward(). that is, to forward a matching packet on port i. The default action (uniess stated otherwise) a packet doesn't match a rule, it will be dropped. COpenFlow controller 128.119/16 4 5

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Write a function, to be included in a sorted linked list class, called printPosition, that will receive a T parameter and print its position within the list ( position 1 if in first node, position 2 if in second…). If the item is not in the list, specify it in a printing. Consider efficiency.
We are making use of a substandard hash map in which all of the values are accumulated in a single container (that is, they are all in the same LinkedList). The function of a hash map has been satisfactorily accomplished.
For now, we're making do with a rudimentary hash map in which all the values are stored in a single bucket (that is, they are all in the same LinkedList). Once a hash map's goal is met, it is considered successful.
5.04-3. Bellman Ford Algorithm - a change in DV (1, part 3). Consider the network below, and suppose that at t=0, the link between nodes g and h goes down. And so at t=0, nodes g and h recompute their DVs. Following this recomputation, to which nodes will h send its new distance vector? (Note: to answer this question, you'll need to know some of the DV entries at g and h at t=0, but hopefully they'll be obvious by inspection). a 1 1 at t=0 the link (with a cost of 6) between nodes g and h goes down b. compute ∞ g all nodes 8 1 6 1 e 1 compute h 1 1 1 1 node i only nodes i and e only O node h does not send out its distance vector, since none of the least costs have changed to any destination. O nodes i and e and g only node e only
Exercise 8.17. In a version of the network reliability problem, we want to know how many different ways there are to send a message from its source to its destination. Hereto, we represent the network by a directed graph G = (V, A), the source by s and the destination by t. In this exercise, we consider two simplified versions of this problem.
5.04-3. Bellman Ford Algorithm - a change in DV (1, part 3). Consider the network below, and suppose that at t=0, the link between nodes g and h goes down. And so at t=0, nodes g and h recompute their DVs. Following this recomputation, to which nodes will h send its new distance vector? (Note: to answer this question, you'll need to know some of the DV entries at g and hat t=0, but hopefully they'll be obvious by inspection). 1 compute g- node i only node e only all nodes at t=0 the link (with a cost of 6) between nodes g and h goes down 8. 00 1 1 1 compute h nodes i and e and g only 1 1 1 1 node h does not send out its distance vector, since none of the least costs have changed to any destination. O nodes i and e only
We have a poor hash map because all values were placed into one container (i.e., they are all in the same LinkedList). Explain how this defeats hash maps if it does.
We have a hash map that wasn't made very well since all the values were dumped into the same bucket (that is, they are all in the same LinkedList). Explain why employing a hash map in the first place would be defeated by this, if that is the case.
All the values were thrown into the same hash bucket, therefore the hash map isn't particularly good (that is, they are all in the same LinkedList). If this is the case, please elaborate on how using a hash map in the first place will be rendered ineffective.
We have a crude hash map where all values are concatenated into a single bucket (that is, they are all in the same LinkedList). A hash map's goal has been accomplished.
Implement the Linked List using head and tail pointer. Interface (.h file) of LinkedList class is given below. Your task is to provide implementation (.cpp file) for LinkedList class. Interface: template<class Type> class LinkedList { private: Node<Type>* head; Node<Type>* tail; <Type> data; public: LinkedList<Type>(); LinkedList<Type>(const LinkedList<Type> &obj); void sortedInsert(Type); Type deleteFromPosition(int position); //deletes the node at the particular position Type delete(int start,int end); //deletes the nodes from starting to ending position bool isEmpty()const; void print()const; ~LinkedList(); }; program in c++.
In this case, we have a hash map that was not constructed with a lot of care since all of the values have been lumped together (that is, they are all in the same LinkedList). In your own words, please elaborate on why this undermines the use of a hash map.