g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. O If the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is the same as the population mean IQ score for older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test then there would be a 3.27% chance that the mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings would be at least 4.5 points higher than the mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings. There is a 3.27% chance that the mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings is at least 4.5 points higher than the mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings. ) There is a 3.27% chance of a Type I error. If the sample mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings is the same as the sample mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test then there would be a 3.27% chance of concluding that the mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings is at least 4.5 points higher than the mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings. h. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. O If the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is the same as the population mean IQ score for older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test, then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the sample mean IQ scores for these 10 sibling pairs differ from each other. O There is a 5% chance that the population mean IQ score is the same for younger and older siblings. OThere is a 5% chance that you are so much smarter than your sibling that there is no need to take an IQ test to make a comparison. O If the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is the same as the population mean IQ score for older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test, then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is higher than the population mean IQ score for older siblings
g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study. O If the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is the same as the population mean IQ score for older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test then there would be a 3.27% chance that the mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings would be at least 4.5 points higher than the mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings. There is a 3.27% chance that the mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings is at least 4.5 points higher than the mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings. ) There is a 3.27% chance of a Type I error. If the sample mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings is the same as the sample mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test then there would be a 3.27% chance of concluding that the mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings is at least 4.5 points higher than the mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings. h. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study. O If the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is the same as the population mean IQ score for older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test, then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the sample mean IQ scores for these 10 sibling pairs differ from each other. O There is a 5% chance that the population mean IQ score is the same for younger and older siblings. OThere is a 5% chance that you are so much smarter than your sibling that there is no need to take an IQ test to make a comparison. O If the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is the same as the population mean IQ score for older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test, then there would be a 5% chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is higher than the population mean IQ score for older siblings
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
Need help with ONLY g and H. First image is to provide context
![](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F09d8acf3-3e62-45b2-92ce-3cee53f3ffa6%2Ff9d61e6d-847e-4b70-a6cc-090bb6659970%2Fzzi5e5.png&w=3840&q=75)
![g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
O If the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is the same as the population mean IQ score
for older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test then there would be a 3.27%
chance that the mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings would be at least 4.5 points higher than
the mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings.
There is a 3.27% chance that the mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings is at least 4.5 points
higher than the mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings.
) There is a 3.27% chance of a Type I error.
If the sample mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings is the same as the sample mean IQ score
for the 10 older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test then there would be a
3.27% chance of concluding that the mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings is at least 4.5
points higher than the mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings.
h. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.
O If the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is the same as the population mean IQ score
for older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test, then there would be a 5%
chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the sample mean IQ scores for these 10
sibling pairs differ from each other.
O There is a 5% chance that the population mean IQ score is the same for younger and older
siblings.
OThere is a 5% chance that you are so much smarter than your sibling that there is no need to take
an IQ test to make a comparison.
O If the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is the same as the population mean IQ score
for older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test, then there would be a 5%
chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean IQ score for younger
siblings is higher than the population mean IQ score for older siblings](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F09d8acf3-3e62-45b2-92ce-3cee53f3ffa6%2Ff9d61e6d-847e-4b70-a6cc-090bb6659970%2F1zi1f9n.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:g. Interpret the p-value in the context of the study.
O If the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is the same as the population mean IQ score
for older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test then there would be a 3.27%
chance that the mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings would be at least 4.5 points higher than
the mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings.
There is a 3.27% chance that the mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings is at least 4.5 points
higher than the mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings.
) There is a 3.27% chance of a Type I error.
If the sample mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings is the same as the sample mean IQ score
for the 10 older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test then there would be a
3.27% chance of concluding that the mean IQ score for the 10 younger siblings is at least 4.5
points higher than the mean IQ score for the 10 older siblings.
h. Interpret the level of significance in the context of the study.
O If the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is the same as the population mean IQ score
for older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test, then there would be a 5%
chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the sample mean IQ scores for these 10
sibling pairs differ from each other.
O There is a 5% chance that the population mean IQ score is the same for younger and older
siblings.
OThere is a 5% chance that you are so much smarter than your sibling that there is no need to take
an IQ test to make a comparison.
O If the population mean IQ score for younger siblings is the same as the population mean IQ score
for older siblings and if another 10 sibling pairs are given an IQ test, then there would be a 5%
chance that we would end up falsely concuding that the population mean IQ score for younger
siblings is higher than the population mean IQ score for older siblings
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 1 images
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
![MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781119256830/9781119256830_smallCoverImage.gif)
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
![Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305251809/9781305251809_smallCoverImage.gif)
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305504912/9781305504912_smallCoverImage.gif)
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781119256830/9781119256830_smallCoverImage.gif)
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
![Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305251809/9781305251809_smallCoverImage.gif)
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305504912/9781305504912_smallCoverImage.gif)
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134683416/9780134683416_smallCoverImage.gif)
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
![The Basic Practice of Statistics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781319042578/9781319042578_smallCoverImage.gif)
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
![Introduction to the Practice of Statistics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781319013387/9781319013387_smallCoverImage.gif)
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman