Arlyn promises to help her friend Chante move on Saturday. Later, Arlyn’s cousins demand she take them to an amusement park on Saturday. Arlyn knows her cousins will be really mad if she doesn’t take them, and Chante will be sort of chill about skipping, so Arlyn breaks her promise.Is Aryln’s behavior morally right or wrong according to utilitarianism? Be sure to fully explain the factors utilitarians consider, and explain how a utilitarian reaches their moral judgment.Is Arlyn’s behavior morally right or wrong according to Kant’s ethics? Be sure to fully explain the factors Kantians consider, and explain how a Kantian reaches their moral judgment.Is Arlyn’s behavior morally right or wrong according to natural law theory? Be sure to fully explain the factors natural law theorists consider, and explain how a natural law theorist reaches their moral judgment.Scenario #3Mrs. Lois Bishop learned she was pregnant with twin fetuses at the same time she learned that one of the twin fetuses had Down syndrome. “There’s no question,” she said, “I want to have an abortion. I had the tests done in the first place because I want to have a healthy child. I knew there was a chance that I would have to have an abortion, so I’m prepared for it.”Her obstetrician, Dr. Georgia Savano, nodded. “I understand that,” she said. “You are certainly within your rights to ask for an abortion, and I can arrange for you to have one. But there is another possibility, an experimental one, that you might want to consider as an option.”The possibility consisted of the destruction of the fetus with Down syndrome while continuing the pregnancy for the other fetus. In the end, this is what Mrs. Bishop chose. A long, thin needle was inserted through Mrs. Bishop’s abdomen and into the heart of the fetus, and a solution was injected into the fetal heart. Although there was a risk Mrs. Bishop would have a miscarriage, she did not. The surviving fetus continued to develop. Mrs. Bishop had a healthy delivery.Dr. Savano was criticized by some physicians as “misusing medicine,” but she rejects such charges. Mrs. Bishop also has no regrets, for if the procedure had not been performed, she would have been forced to have an abortion and destroy both twin fetuses..Is Lois’s behavior morally right or wrong according to utilitarianism? Be sure to fully explain the factors utilitarians consider, and explain how a utilitarian reaches their moral judgment.Is Lois’s behavior morally right or wrong according to Kant’s ethics? Be sure to fully explain the factors Kantians consider, and explain how a Kantian reaches their moral judgment.Is Lois’s behavior morally right or wrong according to natural law theory? Be sure to fully explain the factors natural law theorists consider, and explain how a natural law theorist reaches their moral judgment.Scenario #4Medical research scientists at a drug company have developed a promising new drug, Carlax, that is highly effective in preventing the spread of several sexually transmitted infections (STI’s) among mice. They are set to test the drug on humans, but they initially don’t receive enough human volunteers to participate in their study. The company the scientists works for threatens to stop funding them if they don’t receive enough participants. The scientists need three more volunteers for the study to run. One of the scientists, Laura, proposes the following: “Why don’t we just tell people who have an STI that Carlax will cure them of their STI? This will motivate them to participate.” Team member Jen responds, “But it’s not true. Carlax doesn’t cure mice who already have an STI; it just prevents mice who have an STI from spreading it to their sexual partners. Plus, we need a control group, so some of participants won’t get Carlax. They’ll get a placebo instead. Volunteers should be told all this before agreeing to partake in the study.”“But if Carlax works, our research could greatly prevent the spread of STI’s.” Laura says. “Isn’t it OK to bend the truth for such an important cause?”Laura ultimately gets three more participants by lying, telling them they’re definitely being treated. Carlax winds up being highly effective in preventing the spread of STI’s, and is eventually prescribed across the globe, vastly lowering the rate of STI’s worldwide.Is Laura’s behavior morally right or wrong according to utilitarianism? Be sure to fully explain the factors utilitarians consider, and explain how a utilitarian reaches their moral judgment.Is Laura’s behavior morally right or wrong according to Kant’s ethics? Be sure to fully explain the factors Kantians consider, and explain how a Kantian reaches their moral judgment.Is Laura’s behavior morally right or wrong according to natural law theory? Be sure to fully explain the factors Kantians consider, and explain how a Kantian reaches their moral judgment.

Ethics are moral guidelines of human behavior. Various professionals maintain ethics in their work.…

Answered: g according to utilitarianism? Be sure…

Social Psychology (10th Edition)

10th Edition

ISBN:9780134641287

Author:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers

Publisher:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers

Chapter1: Introducing Social Psychology

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ1

See similar textbooks

Related questions

Question

Arlyn promises to help her friend Chante move on Saturday. Later, Arlyn’s cousins demand she take them to an amusement park on Saturday. Arlyn knows her cousins will be really mad if she doesn’t take them, and Chante will be sort of chill about skipping, so Arlyn breaks her promise.

Is Aryln’s behavior morally right or wrong according to utilitarianism? Be sure to fully explain the factors utilitarians consider, and explain how a utilitarian reaches their moral judgment.
Is Arlyn’s behavior morally right or wrong according to Kant’s ethics? Be sure to fully explain the factors Kantians consider, and explain how a Kantian reaches their moral judgment.
Is Arlyn’s behavior morally right or wrong according to natural law theory? Be sure to fully explain the factors natural law theorists consider, and explain how a natural law theorist reaches their moral judgment.

Scenario #3

Mrs. Lois Bishop learned she was pregnant with twin fetuses at the same time she learned that one of the twin fetuses had Down syndrome. “There’s no question,” she said, “I want to have an abortion. I had the tests done in the first place because I want to have a healthy child. I knew there was a chance that I would have to have an abortion, so I’m prepared for it.”

Her obstetrician, Dr. Georgia Savano, nodded. “I understand that,” she said. “You are certainly within your rights to ask for an abortion, and I can arrange for you to have one. But there is another possibility, an experimental one, that you might want to consider as an option.”

The possibility consisted of the destruction of the fetus with Down syndrome while continuing the pregnancy for the other fetus. In the end, this is what Mrs. Bishop chose. A long, thin needle was inserted through Mrs. Bishop’s abdomen and into the heart of the fetus, and a solution was injected into the fetal heart. Although there was a risk Mrs. Bishop would have a miscarriage, she did not. The surviving fetus continued to develop. Mrs. Bishop had a healthy delivery.

Dr. Savano was criticized by some physicians as “misusing medicine,” but she rejects such charges. Mrs. Bishop also has no regrets, for if the procedure had not been performed, she would have been forced to have an abortion and destroy both twin fetuses..

Is Lois’s behavior morally right or wrong according to utilitarianism? Be sure to fully explain the factors utilitarians consider, and explain how a utilitarian reaches their moral judgment.
Is Lois’s behavior morally right or wrong according to Kant’s ethics? Be sure to fully explain the factors Kantians consider, and explain how a Kantian reaches their moral judgment.
Is Lois’s behavior morally right or wrong according to natural law theory? Be sure to fully explain the factors natural law theorists consider, and explain how a natural law theorist reaches their moral judgment.

Scenario #4

Medical research scientists at a drug company have developed a promising new drug, Carlax, that is highly effective in preventing the spread of several sexually transmitted infections (STI’s) among mice. They are set to test the drug on humans, but they initially don’t receive enough human volunteers to participate in their study. The company the scientists works for threatens to stop funding them if they don’t receive enough participants. The scientists need three more volunteers for the study to run.

One of the scientists, Laura, proposes the following: “Why don’t we just tell people who have an STI that Carlax will cure them of their STI? This will motivate them to participate.”

Team member Jen responds, “But it’s not true. Carlax doesn’t cure mice who already have an STI; it just prevents mice who have an STI from spreading it to their sexual partners. Plus, we need a control group, so some of participants won’t get Carlax. They’ll get a placebo instead. Volunteers should be told all this before agreeing to partake in the study.”

“But if Carlax works, our research could greatly prevent the spread of STI’s.” Laura says. “Isn’t it OK to bend the truth for such an important cause?”

Laura ultimately gets three more participants by lying, telling them they’re definitely being treated. Carlax winds up being highly effective in preventing the spread of STI’s, and is eventually prescribed across the globe, vastly lowering the rate of STI’s worldwide.

Is Laura’s behavior morally right or wrong according to utilitarianism? Be sure to fully explain the factors utilitarians consider, and explain how a utilitarian reaches their moral judgment.
Is Laura’s behavior morally right or wrong according to Kant’s ethics? Be sure to fully explain the factors Kantians consider, and explain how a Kantian reaches their moral judgment.
Is Laura’s behavior morally right or wrong according to natural law theory? Be sure to fully explain the factors Kantians consider, and explain how a Kantian reaches their moral judgment.

Expert Solution