For some years, Mel has contracted with several major pizza retailers for home delivery services. He uses a MARR of 12% per year in all business dealings. His current van, purchased 10 years ago for $75,000, can be used for 3 more years, with an AOC of $23.000 and an estimated $25,000 trade-in value. A better-equipped van will cost $102,500, have an economic life of 6 years, an estimated trade- in value of $45,000, an AOC of $32,000 per year, and will generate an estimated $24,000 per year additional revenue. On the basis of these estimates, what market value now for the current van will make the new van equally attractive? Solve by spreadsheet or factors, as requested by your instructor. On equating the AW values of the current van and the new van, to calculate the market value now for the current van, the spreadsheet tool that should be used is GOAL SEEK The market value now for the current van that will make the new van equally attractive will be $ 62232.06 O

For some years, Mel has contracted with several major pizza retailers for home delivery services. He uses a MARR of 12% per year in all business dealings. His current van, purchased 10 years ago for $75,000, can be used for 3 more years, with an AOC of $23.000 and an estimated $25,000 trade-in value. A better-equipped van will cost $102,500, have an economic life of 6 years, an estimated trade- in value of $45,000, an AOC of $32,000 per year, and will generate an estimated $24,000 per year additional revenue. On the basis of these estimates, what market value now for the current van will make the new van equally attractive? Solve by spreadsheet or factors, as requested by your instructor. On equating the AW values of the current van and the new van, to calculate the market value now for the current van, the spreadsheet tool that should be used is GOAL SEEK The market value now for the current van that will make the new van equally attractive will be $ 62232.06 O

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two incinerators are being considered by a waste management company. Design A has an initial cost of $2,500,000, has annual operating and maintenance costs of $800,000, and requires overhauls every 5 years at a cost of $1,250,000. Design B is more sophisticated, including computer controls; it has an initial cost of $5,750,000, has annual operating and maintenance costs of $600,000, and requires overhauls every 10 years at a cost of $3,000,000. Using a 5%/year interest rate, determine the capitalized cost for each design and recommend which should be chosen.
A portable concrete test instrument used in construction for evaluating and profiling concrete surfaces (MACRS-GDS 5-year property class) is under consideration by a construction firm for $25,500. The instrument will be used for 6 years and be worth $2,500 at that time. The annual cost of use and maintenance will be $13,000. Alternatively, a more automated instrument (same property class) available from the manufacturer costs $26,000, with use and maintenance costs of only $7,500 and salvage value after 6 years of $3,000. The marginal tax rate is 25%, and MARR is an after-tax 12%. Determine which alternative is less costly, based upon comparison of after-tax annual worth. Show the AW values used to make your decision.
Concurris Prototyping is committed to using the newest and finest equipment in its labs. Accordingly, Wilma, a senior engineer, has recommended that a 2-year-old piece of precision measurement equipment be replaced immediately. She believes it can be demonstrated that the proposed equipment is economically advantageous at a 15%-per year return and a planning horizon of 5 years. Perform the replacement analysis using the annual worth method, a 5-year study period, and the estimates below. Was Wilma correct? Equipment Original purchase price, $ Current market value, $ Remaining life, years Estimated value in 5 years, $ Salvage value after 15 years, $ AOC, $ per year Current -30,000 15,000 5 7,000 -11,000 The AW of the defender is $- challenger is $- Wilma ((Click to select)) correct. Proposed -40,000 -- 15 10,000 5,000 -3,000 and the AW of the
An in place machine has an equivalent annual worth of $-100000 for each year of its maximum remaining useful life of two years. A suitable replacement is determined to have equivalent annual worth values of $-175000, $-125000, and $-150000 per year if kept for 1,2, or 3 years, respectively. When should the company replace the machine, if it uses a fixed 3-year planning horizon? Use an interest rate of 17.255609824% per year compounded semiannualy.
Your firm is currently paying $3,000 a year to a commercial garbage collection agency to haul waste paper to the city dump. The paper could be sold as waste paper if it were baled and strapped. A paper baler is available at the following conditions: Purchase price = $6,500 Labor to operate baler = $3,500/year Strapping material = $300/year Life of baler = 30 years Salvage value = $500 MARR = 10%/year If it is estimated that 500 bales would be produced per year, what would the selling price per bale to a wastepaper dealer have to be to make this project acceptable? Assume no inflation.
Give typing answer with explanation and conclusion
Apricot Computers is considering replacing its material handling system and either purchasing or leasing a new system. The old system has an annual operating and maintenance cost of $31,000, a remaining life of 8 years, and an estimated salvage value of $5,300 at that time. A new system can be purchased for $259,000; it will be worth $24,000 in 8 years; and it will have annual operating and maintenance costs of $16,000/year. If the new system is purchased, the old system can be traded in for $19,000. Leasing a new system will cost $25,000/year, payable at the beginning of the year, plus operating costs of $7,100/year, payable at the end of the year. If the new system is leased, the old system will be sold for $9,000. MARR is 15%. Compare the annual worths of keeping the old system, buying a new system, and leasing a new system based upon a planning horizon of 8 years. Click here to access the TVM Factor Table Calculator For calculation purposes, use 5 decimal places as displayed in the…
Ans is $ 7.322 please correct me
! Required information An electric switch manufacturing company is trying to decide between three different assembly methods. Method A has an estimated first cost of $40,000, an annual operating cost (AOC) of $12,000, and a service life of 2 years. Method B will cost $70,000 to buy and will have an AOC of $6,000 over its 4-year service life. Method C costs $125,000 initially with an AOC of $3,500 over its 8-year life. Methods A and B will have no salvage value, but Method C will have equipment worth 7% of its first cost. Perform a present worth analysis to select the method at /= 12% per year. The present worth of method A is $ The present worth of method B is $ The present worth of method C is $ ✓is selected. Method C
Concurris Prototyping is committed to using the newest and finest equipment in its labs. Accordingly, Wilma, a senior engineer, has recommended that a 2-year-old piece of precision measurement equipment be replaced immediately. She believes it can be demonstrated that the proposed equipment is economically advantageous at a 15%-per year return and a planning horizon of 5 years. Perform the replacement analysis using the annual worth method, a 5-year study period, and the estimates below. Was Wilma correct Equipment Current Proposed Original purchase price, $ Current market value, $ -30,000 -42,000 15,000 Remaining life, years 5 15 Estimated value in 5 years, $ 7,000 10,000 5,000 -3,000 Salvage value after 15 years, $ AOC, $ per year The AW of the defender is $- Wilma (Click to select) correct. -14,000 and the AW of the challenger is $-
A city government feels that the energy production capacity must be expanded to meet anticipated demands for energy. There are three alternatives to consider: @A nuclear facility with an investment of $250 million, operating costs of $3 million per year and life of 20 years. @ A coal plant with an investment of $200 million operating costs of $10 million per year and a life of 20 years. 26°C I P Type here to search
Whole solution