For Problems #1 through #15, consider the following context: The farmers at Olde Port Orchards grow a number of varieties of apples, including Royal Gala, Golden Delicious, Honey Crisp, Pink Lady, and Red Delicious. Patrons at the farm's various fall harvest festivals can select one apple on their way off the property as a takeaway treat. The management wonders if the apple varieties selected comparably by festival patrons. A simple random sample of recent selections by festival patrons was as follows: Royal Gala Golden Delicious Honey Crisp Pink Lady Red Delicious 46 54 50 32 68 Make no assumptions about the underlying distribution. Test the claim at the 1% level of significance. Item #12: Determine the critical value, rounded to the nearest thousandth.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

PLS ANSWER THESE FOUR QUESTIONS THEY BASICALLY GO HAND AND HAND WITH EACH OTHER 

**Context for Problems #1 through #15:**

The farmers at Olde Port Orchards grow several varieties of apples, including Royal Gala, Golden Delicious, Honey Crisp, Pink Lady, and Red Delicious. Patrons at the farm's various fall harvest festivals can select one apple on their way off the property as a takeaway treat. The management is curious whether the apple varieties are selected comparably by festival patrons. A simple random sample of recent selections by festival patrons was recorded as follows:

| Royal Gala | Golden Delicious | Honey Crisp | Pink Lady | Red Delicious |
|------------|------------------|-------------|-----------|---------------|
| 46         | 54               | 50          | 32        | 68            |

Make no assumptions about the underlying distribution. Test the claim at the 1% level of significance.

---

**Item #12:** Determine the critical value, rounded to the nearest thousandth.

[Textbox for answer]

---

**Question 13:**

For Problems #1 through #15, consider the following context (same as above).

| Royal Gala | Golden Delicious | Honey Crisp | Pink Lady | Red Delicious |
|------------|------------------|-------------|-----------|---------------|
| 46         | 54               | 50          | 32        | 68            |

Make no assumptions about the underlying distribution. Test the claim at the 1% level of significance.

**Item #13:** Determine the *p*-value, rounded to the nearest ten-thousandth: 0.####

[Textbox for answer]
Transcribed Image Text:**Context for Problems #1 through #15:** The farmers at Olde Port Orchards grow several varieties of apples, including Royal Gala, Golden Delicious, Honey Crisp, Pink Lady, and Red Delicious. Patrons at the farm's various fall harvest festivals can select one apple on their way off the property as a takeaway treat. The management is curious whether the apple varieties are selected comparably by festival patrons. A simple random sample of recent selections by festival patrons was recorded as follows: | Royal Gala | Golden Delicious | Honey Crisp | Pink Lady | Red Delicious | |------------|------------------|-------------|-----------|---------------| | 46 | 54 | 50 | 32 | 68 | Make no assumptions about the underlying distribution. Test the claim at the 1% level of significance. --- **Item #12:** Determine the critical value, rounded to the nearest thousandth. [Textbox for answer] --- **Question 13:** For Problems #1 through #15, consider the following context (same as above). | Royal Gala | Golden Delicious | Honey Crisp | Pink Lady | Red Delicious | |------------|------------------|-------------|-----------|---------------| | 46 | 54 | 50 | 32 | 68 | Make no assumptions about the underlying distribution. Test the claim at the 1% level of significance. **Item #13:** Determine the *p*-value, rounded to the nearest ten-thousandth: 0.#### [Textbox for answer]
**Item #14:** What is the most appropriate technical conclusion, with any relevant qualifiers, based on the available evidence and testing at the indicated level of significance?

- ○ highly reject the null hypothesis (extremely significant)
- ○ reject the null hypothesis (significant)
- ○ marginally reject the null hypothesis (marginally significant)
- ○ highly fail to reject the null hypothesis (extremely insignificant)
- ○ fail to reject the null hypothesis (insignificant)
- ○ marginally fail to reject the null hypothesis (marginally insignificant)
- ○ cannot draw any conclusion based on the available evidence
- ○ no conclusion

---

**QUESTION 15**

*For Problems #1 through #15, consider the following context:* The farmers at Olde Port Orchards grow a number of varieties of apples, including Royal Gala, Golden Delicious, Honey Crisp, Pink Lady, and Red Delicious. Patrons at the farm's various fall harvest festivals can select one apple on their way off the property as a takeaway treat. The management wonders if the apple varieties are selected comparably by festival patrons. A simple random sample of recent selections by festival patrons was as follows:

| Royal Gala | Golden Delicious | Honey Crisp | Pink Lady | Red Delicious |
|------------|------------------|-------------|-----------|---------------|
| 46         | 54               | 50          | 32        | 68            |

Make no assumptions about the underlying distribution. Test the claim at the 1% level of significance.

**Item #15:** What is the most appropriate contextual conclusion or interpretation, with any relevant qualifiers, based on the available evidence and testing at the indicated level of significance?

- ○ It is highly reasonable to claim that the apples are selected comparably, a highly statistically uninteresting finding.
- ○ It is reasonable to claim that the apples are selected comparably, a statistically uninteresting finding.
- ○ It is marginally reasonable to claim that the apples are selected comparably, a marginally statistically uninteresting finding.
- ○ It is highly unreasonable to claim that the apples are selected comparably, a highly statistically interesting finding.
- ○ It is unreasonable to claim that the apples are selected comparably, a statistically interesting finding.
- ○ It is marginally unreasonable to claim that the apples are selected comparably, a marginally statistically interesting finding.
- ○ cannot provide any interpretations at this time based on the available evidence
- ○ no conclusion
Transcribed Image Text:**Item #14:** What is the most appropriate technical conclusion, with any relevant qualifiers, based on the available evidence and testing at the indicated level of significance? - ○ highly reject the null hypothesis (extremely significant) - ○ reject the null hypothesis (significant) - ○ marginally reject the null hypothesis (marginally significant) - ○ highly fail to reject the null hypothesis (extremely insignificant) - ○ fail to reject the null hypothesis (insignificant) - ○ marginally fail to reject the null hypothesis (marginally insignificant) - ○ cannot draw any conclusion based on the available evidence - ○ no conclusion --- **QUESTION 15** *For Problems #1 through #15, consider the following context:* The farmers at Olde Port Orchards grow a number of varieties of apples, including Royal Gala, Golden Delicious, Honey Crisp, Pink Lady, and Red Delicious. Patrons at the farm's various fall harvest festivals can select one apple on their way off the property as a takeaway treat. The management wonders if the apple varieties are selected comparably by festival patrons. A simple random sample of recent selections by festival patrons was as follows: | Royal Gala | Golden Delicious | Honey Crisp | Pink Lady | Red Delicious | |------------|------------------|-------------|-----------|---------------| | 46 | 54 | 50 | 32 | 68 | Make no assumptions about the underlying distribution. Test the claim at the 1% level of significance. **Item #15:** What is the most appropriate contextual conclusion or interpretation, with any relevant qualifiers, based on the available evidence and testing at the indicated level of significance? - ○ It is highly reasonable to claim that the apples are selected comparably, a highly statistically uninteresting finding. - ○ It is reasonable to claim that the apples are selected comparably, a statistically uninteresting finding. - ○ It is marginally reasonable to claim that the apples are selected comparably, a marginally statistically uninteresting finding. - ○ It is highly unreasonable to claim that the apples are selected comparably, a highly statistically interesting finding. - ○ It is unreasonable to claim that the apples are selected comparably, a statistically interesting finding. - ○ It is marginally unreasonable to claim that the apples are selected comparably, a marginally statistically interesting finding. - ○ cannot provide any interpretations at this time based on the available evidence - ○ no conclusion
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman