For conducting a two-tailed hypothesis test with a certain data set, using the smaller of n,-1 and ng-1 for the degrees of freedom results in df = 11, and the coresponding critical values are t 12201. Using the formula for the exact degrees of freedom results in df= 19.063, and the corresponding critical values are t+2.093. How is using the critical values of t=+2.201 more "conservative" than using the critical values of +2.093? Choose the correct answer below. O A. Using the critical values of t= +2.201 is less likely to lead to rejection of the null hypothesis than using the critical values of 2.093 O B. Using the critical values of t= +2.201 is more likely to lead to rejection of the null hypothesis than using the critical values of 2.093. OC. Using the critical values of t= +2.201 results in rounding the test statistic to more decimal places than using the critical values of 2.093 OD. Using the critical values of t= 12.201 requires fewer calculations than using the critical values of t2.093.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question
**Hypothesis Testing with Different Critical Values: An Educational Insight**

**Introduction:**
In statistical hypothesis testing, selecting the appropriate critical values is crucial for accurate decision-making. This example illustrates the impact of choosing different critical values in a two-tailed hypothesis test.

**Scenario Explanation:**
For a two-tailed hypothesis test with a certain data set, we have two different approaches for determining degrees of freedom (df):

1. **Using a conservative approach:** 
   - Degrees of freedom calculated as the smaller of \( n_1 - 1 \) and \( n_2 - 1 \), resulting in \( df = 11 \).
   - Corresponding critical values: \( t = \pm 2.201 \).

2. **Using the formula for exact degrees of freedom:**
   - Results in \( df = 19.063 \).
   - Corresponding critical values: \( t = \pm 2.093 \).

**Task:**
Determine why using the critical values of \( t = \pm 2.201 \) is more "conservative" compared to the critical values of \( \pm 2.093 \).

**Options:**
Choose the correct answer from the following:

**A.** Using the critical values of \( t = \pm 2.201 \) is less likely to lead to rejection of the null hypothesis than using the critical values of \( \pm 2.093 \).

**B.** Using the critical values of \( t = \pm 2.201 \) is more likely to lead to rejection of the null hypothesis than using the critical values of \( \pm 2.093 \).

**C.** Using the critical values of \( t = \pm 2.201 \) results in rounding the test statistic to more decimal places than using the critical values of \( \pm 2.093 \).

**D.** Using the critical values of \( \pm 2.201 \) requires fewer calculations than using the critical values of \( \pm 2.093 \).

**Analysis:**
Choosing a more conservative critical value (higher in absolute terms) like \( \pm 2.201 \) generally results in a lower likelihood of rejecting the null hypothesis, favoring the maintenance of the null until there is strong enough evidence against it. This approach reduces the risk of a Type I error, aligning with a more cautious stance in hypothesis testing.

**Conclusion:**
Understanding
Transcribed Image Text:**Hypothesis Testing with Different Critical Values: An Educational Insight** **Introduction:** In statistical hypothesis testing, selecting the appropriate critical values is crucial for accurate decision-making. This example illustrates the impact of choosing different critical values in a two-tailed hypothesis test. **Scenario Explanation:** For a two-tailed hypothesis test with a certain data set, we have two different approaches for determining degrees of freedom (df): 1. **Using a conservative approach:** - Degrees of freedom calculated as the smaller of \( n_1 - 1 \) and \( n_2 - 1 \), resulting in \( df = 11 \). - Corresponding critical values: \( t = \pm 2.201 \). 2. **Using the formula for exact degrees of freedom:** - Results in \( df = 19.063 \). - Corresponding critical values: \( t = \pm 2.093 \). **Task:** Determine why using the critical values of \( t = \pm 2.201 \) is more "conservative" compared to the critical values of \( \pm 2.093 \). **Options:** Choose the correct answer from the following: **A.** Using the critical values of \( t = \pm 2.201 \) is less likely to lead to rejection of the null hypothesis than using the critical values of \( \pm 2.093 \). **B.** Using the critical values of \( t = \pm 2.201 \) is more likely to lead to rejection of the null hypothesis than using the critical values of \( \pm 2.093 \). **C.** Using the critical values of \( t = \pm 2.201 \) results in rounding the test statistic to more decimal places than using the critical values of \( \pm 2.093 \). **D.** Using the critical values of \( \pm 2.201 \) requires fewer calculations than using the critical values of \( \pm 2.093 \). **Analysis:** Choosing a more conservative critical value (higher in absolute terms) like \( \pm 2.201 \) generally results in a lower likelihood of rejecting the null hypothesis, favoring the maintenance of the null until there is strong enough evidence against it. This approach reduces the risk of a Type I error, aligning with a more cautious stance in hypothesis testing. **Conclusion:** Understanding
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Means
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman