For 1990, let dkr be a firm's debt to capital ratio, let eps denote the earnings per share, let netinc denote net income, and let salary denote total compensation for the CEO. 1. Using relevant data, the following equation was estimated: return = -14.37 + .321dkr + .043eps - .0051netinc+ .0035salary (6.89) (.201) (.078) (.0047) (.0022) n = 142 R2 = .0395 Test whether the explanatory variables are jointly significant at the 5% level. Is any explanatory variable individually significant at the 5% significance level? 2. Now, reestimate the model using the log of netinc and salary: return = -36.30 + .327dkr + .069eps- 4.74log(netinc) + 7.24log(salary) (39.37) (.203) (.080) (3.39) (6.31) n = 142 R2 = .0330 Do any of your conclusions from part (1.) change? 3. In this sample, some firms have zero debt and others have negative earnings. Should we try to use log(dkr) or log(eps) in the model to see if these improve the fit? Explain. 4 Overall is the evidence for predictability of stock returns strong or weak?
For 1990, let dkr be a firm's debt to capital ratio, let eps denote the earnings per share, let netinc denote net income, and let salary denote total compensation for the CEO. 1. Using relevant data, the following equation was estimated: return = -14.37 + .321dkr + .043eps - .0051netinc+ .0035salary (6.89) (.201) (.078) (.0047) (.0022) n = 142 R2 = .0395 Test whether the explanatory variables are jointly significant at the 5% level. Is any explanatory variable individually significant at the 5% significance level? 2. Now, reestimate the model using the log of netinc and salary: return = -36.30 + .327dkr + .069eps- 4.74log(netinc) + 7.24log(salary) (39.37) (.203) (.080) (3.39) (6.31) n = 142 R2 = .0330 Do any of your conclusions from part (1.) change? 3. In this sample, some firms have zero debt and others have negative earnings. Should we try to use log(dkr) or log(eps) in the model to see if these improve the fit? Explain. 4 Overall is the evidence for predictability of stock returns strong or weak?
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
Just number 3 please thankyou
Transcribed Image Text:Regression analysis can be used to test whether the market efficiently uses information in valuing
stocks. For concreteness, let return be the total return from holding a firm's stock over the four-
year period from the end of 1990 to the end of 1994. The efficient markets hypothesis says
that these returns should not be systematically related to information known in 1990. If firm
characteristics known at the beginning of the period help to predict stock returns, then we could
use this information in choosing stocks.
1
For 1990, let dkr be a firm's debt to capital ratio, let eps denote the earnings per share, let
netinc denote net income, and let salary denote total compensation for the CEO.
1. Using relevant data, the following equation was estimated:
return = -14.37 + .321dkr + .043eps – .0051etinc + .0035salary
(6.89) (.201)
(.078)
(.0047)
(.0022)
n = 142 R2 = .0395
Test whether the explanatory variables are jointly significant at the 5% level. Is any
explanatory variable individually significant at the 5% significance level?
2. Now, reestimate the model using the log of netinc and salary:
return = -36.30 + .327dkr + .069eps – 4.74log(netinc) + 7.24log(salary)
(.080)
(39.37) (.203)
(3.39)
(6.31)
n = 142 R2 = .0330
Do any of your conclusions from part (1.) change?
3. In this sample, some firms have zero debt and others have negative earnings. Should we
try to use log(dkr) or log(eps) in the model to see if these improve the fit? Explain.
4. Overall, is the evidence for predictability of stock returns strong or weak?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education