Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Engineering
Chemical Engineering
flow diagram based

flow diagram based

Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics
Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics
8th Edition
ISBN:9781259696527
Author:J.M. Smith Termodinamica en ingenieria quimica, Hendrick C Van Ness, Michael Abbott, Mark Swihart
Publisher:J.M. Smith Termodinamica en ingenieria quimica, Hendrick C Van Ness, Michael Abbott, Mark Swihart
Chapter1: Introduction
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1P
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question

explain the flow diagram based on the feed run

CWOUT CONDENSE PREHEAT S10 COLFEED OVHD OUTPH CWIN FEED SEP OUTCOND COLUMN VENT LSEP RDRUM TO COLUMN B R S1 TOTAL Figure 6. Aspen Plus process flow diagram.
Transcribed Image Text:CWOUT CONDENSE PREHEAT S10 COLFEED OVHD OUTPH CWIN FEED SEP OUTCOND COLUMN VENT LSEP RDRUM TO COLUMN B R S1 TOTAL Figure 6. Aspen Plus process flow diagram.
Figure 5. Temperature profiles; total reflux; simulation and experimental. An Aspen Plus simula- tion is developed to model the process. An Aspen "Radfrac stripper" model (reboiler but no condenser) is used for the column. Aspen "HeatX" models Feed run The experimental values that were specified for input data are used for the feed preheater and condensers. The NRTL physical property package is used. The process flow diagram is given in Figure 6. to the simulation are listed below. 1. Adjusted feed flowrate = 1.631 kmol/h 138 Chemical Engineering Education 2. Adjusted feed composition = 0.2191 mole fraction methanol 6. Cooling water flowrate = 0.433 kg/min 7. Cooling water inlet temperature = 5.8 °C 3. Feed tank temperature = 20°C 8. Partial reboiler stage efficiency = 100% 4. Bottoms flowrate = 1.286 kmol/h 9. Stage efficiency 65% 5. Reflux flowrate = 0.464 kmol/h All of the other variables are calculated by the model. Table 4 compares experimental and simulation results. The agreement is quite good. Figure 3 com- pares the temperature profiles. Table 4 Comparison of experimental and simulation results; feed run Experiment Simulation Total reflux run mf methanol 0.965 0.956 How to set up a total reflux simulation is not completely obvious. The Aspen Plus "Radfrac" model requires feed and product streams, but these are all zero under total reflux operation. The reflux flowrate is set at the experimental value (0.8343 kmol/h). Efficiency is set at 65%. mf methanol 0.022 0.021 QPH kW 1.473 1.547 Qew kW 5.938 6.797 kW 16.40 9.404 Tovhd °C 66.3 65.8 A small feed flowrate (0.01 kmol/h) is specified with composition 0.211 mole fraction Treflux °C 50.6 46.9
Transcribed Image Text:Figure 5. Temperature profiles; total reflux; simulation and experimental. An Aspen Plus simula- tion is developed to model the process. An Aspen "Radfrac stripper" model (reboiler but no condenser) is used for the column. Aspen "HeatX" models Feed run The experimental values that were specified for input data are used for the feed preheater and condensers. The NRTL physical property package is used. The process flow diagram is given in Figure 6. to the simulation are listed below. 1. Adjusted feed flowrate = 1.631 kmol/h 138 Chemical Engineering Education 2. Adjusted feed composition = 0.2191 mole fraction methanol 6. Cooling water flowrate = 0.433 kg/min 7. Cooling water inlet temperature = 5.8 °C 3. Feed tank temperature = 20°C 8. Partial reboiler stage efficiency = 100% 4. Bottoms flowrate = 1.286 kmol/h 9. Stage efficiency 65% 5. Reflux flowrate = 0.464 kmol/h All of the other variables are calculated by the model. Table 4 compares experimental and simulation results. The agreement is quite good. Figure 3 com- pares the temperature profiles. Table 4 Comparison of experimental and simulation results; feed run Experiment Simulation Total reflux run mf methanol 0.965 0.956 How to set up a total reflux simulation is not completely obvious. The Aspen Plus "Radfrac" model requires feed and product streams, but these are all zero under total reflux operation. The reflux flowrate is set at the experimental value (0.8343 kmol/h). Efficiency is set at 65%. mf methanol 0.022 0.021 QPH kW 1.473 1.547 Qew kW 5.938 6.797 kW 16.40 9.404 Tovhd °C 66.3 65.8 A small feed flowrate (0.01 kmol/h) is specified with composition 0.211 mole fraction Treflux °C 50.6 46.9
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Steady state model
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, chemical-engineering and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynami…
Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynami…
Chemical Engineering
ISBN:
9781259696527
Author:
J.M. Smith Termodinamica en ingenieria quimica, Hendrick C Van Ness, Michael Abbott, Mark Swihart
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind…
Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind…
Chemical Engineering
ISBN:
9781118431221
Author:
Richard M. Felder, Ronald W. Rousseau, Lisa G. Bullard
Publisher:
WILEY
Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering (5th Ed…
Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering (5th Ed…
Chemical Engineering
ISBN:
9780133887518
Author:
H. Scott Fogler
Publisher:
Prentice Hall
Process Dynamics and Control, 4e
Process Dynamics and Control, 4e
Chemical Engineering
ISBN:
9781119285915
Author:
Seborg
Publisher:
WILEY
Industrial Plastics: Theory and Applications
Industrial Plastics: Theory and Applications
Chemical Engineering
ISBN:
9781285061238
Author:
Lokensgard, Erik
Publisher:
Delmar Cengage Learning
Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering
Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering
Chemical Engineering
ISBN:
9780072848236
Author:
Warren McCabe, Julian C. Smith, Peter Harriott
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Companies, The
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS