Find the partial derivatives of the following function:(7xz4-5x²z3+3x5)4(3xz5-2x4+8z3)5y=f(x,z) =(3xz5– 2xª + 8z354(7xzª – 5x²,3+ 3x5^(7z4– 10xz³+15x4 – (7xzª- 5x²,3+3x545(3xz5_- 2xª+ 8z35{3z 5-8x3[(3xz- 2x4+ 8z 35,2fx =- 2x+ 8zI.(3xz5- 2x+ 8z 354(7xzª – 5x²z3+ 3x5³(28xz3 – 15xz3- (7xz4- 5x²23+ 3x3x545(3xz5- 2xª+ 8z3^(15xzª+16z)2.3[(3x25- 2x4+ 8z 35,²(3xz5 – 2x4+ 8z 35(7xz4 – 5x²23+ 3x5³(7z4– 10xz3+15x4– (7xz^- 5x²z3+3x9(3xz5-2xª+8z3^(3z5-8x3[(3x2 5- 2x4+ 8z351²O I.(3xzfz'- 2x*+ 8z 3(7xz4_4- 5x2z3+ 3x3(28xz 3-15x223- (7xz4- 5x?z3+ 3x54(3xz5- 2x4+ 8z34(15xz4+16z)[(3x2 5- 2x4+ 82 35j²-2x*+ 8z354(7xzª – 5x²,3+ 3x5³(7zª – 1Oxz3 +15x4 - (7xz^– 5x²½³+ 3x545(3xz5– 2xª+ 8z 34(325- 8x³ + 8z°[(3x25- 2x4+ 8z 35,2(3xz5- 2x4+ 8z 354(7xz4– 5x²z3+ 3x5%½28xz3-15x?z2+ 3x) - (7xz4- 5xz³+ 3x45(3xz5- 2x+8z34(15xz4 - 2x+16z)(3xz 5- 2x4+ 82 35j²2.3- 10xz+15x- 2x+ 8zfx =II.2_3fz%3Dfx =-(3xz5– 2x* + &z 3}54(7xz* – 5x²z ³ + 3x5³(7z* - 10xz³+15x*) – (7xz*- 5x²z³+ 3x5*5(3xz5– 2x*+ 8z 3*(3z5 – 8x[(3xz5- 2x*+ 8z3512O IV.(3xz5– 2x*+ 8z 354(7xz*– 5x²z³+ 3x5³(28xz3– 15xz} – (7xz*- 5x²z³+ 3x545(3xz5– 2x*+ 8z3*(15xz*+16z)f2 =[(3x75- 2r4++ 874512

We have to find partial derivatives of the following function.

Find the partial derivatives of the following function: (7xz4-5x?z3+3x5)4 (3xz25-2x4+8z3)5 y=f(x,z) = (3x2 5– 2x*+ 8z 3$4(7xz ª_ sx²;3+ 3x5^17zª–10xz³+ 15x5– (7xz fx = (3x2 5- 214+ 82 35,2 I. (3x2 5– 2x*+ 8z 354(7xz^- 5x²,³+ 3x5³(28xz ³–-15x223- (7xz 4- 5x²z³+ 3x94s(3x25- 2x*+ 8z 34a5xz^+162) f7 = [(3x2 5- 2x4+ 8z 3,5,2 (3x2 5- 2x4+ 82 35(7xz 4. 3x 5°7zª –10xz ³ + 15x 4- (7xzª. [(3x2 5- 2x*+ 82 35,2 5928xz3 –15x3-(7x24-5x3+ 3x543xz 5-2x4+823^a5xz*+162) fx = 3+ 3x543xz5- 2x4+ &z34325= 8x3 O I. (3x25– 2x*+ 8z 35(7xzª- 5x3 f, = 5 4 25,2

Find the partial derivatives of the following function: (7xz4-5x?z3+3x5)4 (3xz25-2x4+8z3)5 y=f(x,z) = (3x2 5– 2x+ 8z 3$4(7xz ª_ sx²;3+ 3x5^17zª–10xz³+ 15x5– (7xz fx = (3x2 5- 214+ 82 35,2 I. (3x2 5– 2x+ 8z 354(7xz^- 5x²,³+ 3x5³(28xz ³–-15x223- (7xz 4- 5x²z³+ 3x94s(3x25- 2x+ 8z 34a5xz^+162) f7 = [(3x2 5- 2x4+ 8z 3,5,2 (3x2 5- 2x4+ 82 35(7xz 4. 3x 5°7zª –10xz ³ + 15x 4- (7xzª. [(3x2 5- 2x+ 82 35,2 5928xz3 –15x3-(7x24-5x3+ 3x543xz 5-2x4+823^a5xz+162) fx = 3+ 3x543xz5- 2x4+ &z34325= 8x3 O I. (3x25– 2x+ 8z 35(7xzª- 5x3 f, = 5 4 25,2

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Thank you but the equtions are shown as question mark? Could you check it. I attached the related notes to this topic please see the attachment.
If i=10% Find the value of F of this diagram. 100 100 90 90 80 80 70 70 60 60 50 D 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 F=?
Suppose you have a linear optimization model where you are trying to decide which products to produceto maximize profit. Answer the following questions and be as specific as possible.(a) What does the additive assumption imply about the profit objective? (b) What does the proportionality assumption imply about the profit objective? (c) Can you think of any reasonable profit functions that would not be linear in the amounts of theproducts produced?
Differentiate the function. g(x) = (x⁹ - 8x)-2 g'(x) = Differentiate the function. 5 f'(s) = f(s) = (2s7 + 1)4 Differentiate the function. 1 g(x) = (2x+5x+1) 3/4 g'(x) = Differentiate the function. dy y = √√√3x² + 6x + 2 dx
For the function f(x,y) = e Xy, find f, and f, f, =| (Simplify your answer.) (Simplify your answer.) %3D y.
Consider the following figure. 6 tr yield per acre (tonnes) 4 2 B C | A 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 fertilizer applied per acre of wheat This non-linear function shows that over the range shown, 80
2. (This problem derives the general result that any polynomial function is of a lower asymptotic order than any exponential function.) First, we prove a special case. Suppose that we have two functions, f(n) = n² and g(n) = 2". We will prove that f(n) = O(g(n)). • port (a). (c) Show that, for any n ≥ no, it must be the case that f(n) ≤ cog(n) = f(n+1) ≤ cog(n+1). Precisely state the argument by induction that n² = 0(2¹). Now, define f(n) = nk where k ≥ 1, g(n) = a", where a ≥ 1. (d) (Slightly harder). Argue that, for any k and a, there exists some n₁ such that : (1₁+¹)* < a.
2. (This problem derives the general result that any polynomial function is of a lower asymptotic order than any exponential function.) First, we prove a special case. Suppose that we have two functions, f(n) = n² and g(n) = 2". We will prove that f(n) = O(g(n)). (e) (Slightly harder) Find a constant c₁ such that f(ni) ≤ cig(n1), where n₁ is defined as in part (d). (f) (Harder) Show that, for any n ≥ n₁, it must be the case that f(n) ≤ cig(n) ⇒ f(n+1) ≤ cig(n+1), and therefore nk = O(a") for all k, a ≥ 1.
C. Suppose your neighbor is a physics major who also races motorcycles, and she tells you that horsepower can be expressed in terms of the following equation: H = MDA/S where M=mass, D-distance, A=acceleration and S and H are as defined above. Based on this conversation with your neighbor, you decide to change the functional form of the relationship to include 1/H rather than H as an explanatory variable because that's the appropriate theoretical relationship between the two variables. Estimate the above equation, substituting 1/H for H. Which of the two models do you prefer and why?
Doubt: Calculations obtained from TC come from function TC = 80 + 3q + 2q2? For example, for q = 1, for me it is TC = 85, not 83 and so on. Please check it. Thanks
Three point charges are at the corners of a square of side a as shown in the Figure, given: 9= 29 92 3q 93 29 a 0.50 m 1.00µC a) [70%] Find the net electric potential caused by q,92 and q3 at the point P. [70%] b) [30%] If put a charge q, 2.00 uC at the point P, calculate the electric potential energy. a 39 fthis ucenario to get
4